Originally posted on 05/18/2011:

Quote Originally Posted by Bill Dozer View Post

This casino issue closest resembles a bad line with an extra zero or maybe more so a line left up well into the game. It was an obvious gross error. Except in this case, there was no funds at risk or chance of losing. You could play this game by just hitting deal and win. It was closer to an ATM than a game of chance. Outside of the argument that a book should pay for its mistakes, there is nothing that suggest the player risked, earned, or won money playing this game.
I wonder what would happen if someone would discover that 5Dimes has a casino game with a 20% payout (instead of a, let's say, 90% declared payout) running for a few years, being the opposite of a ATM machine - would 5Dimes payback all the players that lost money on that machine?