Quote Originally Posted by Pushkin View Post
He's not really misleading anyone since he explains in great detail how his system works and how the wins and losses are recorded. If someone sees a 12-1 record for -0.62 units than they should take the time to discover why and/or how this is. I do agree that any "series" that produces a loss in terms of units and/or unit fractions, is indeed a loss, but that should be obvious to anyone.
If it's obvious to anyone why does he record this as a loss? Is he trying to rewrite the definition of the word "loss" in the oxford dictionary?