There's no question that you have all the facts Justin. If we clearly look at this being a "regular average Joe" there's no question that the book should pay him for winning. The problem that I see in this entire case is the player committed fraud in the past. His image was already tarnished. He didn't have to go on a wrecking ball demolition style and "let's see how many deposits I can make... and then let's do CHARGEBACKS on them." He made a choice... a decision and it wasn't an intelligent one. That's why the card player isn't credible. He has no leg to stand on. Sure, we don't have actual proof if there was a ROBOT or not playing for him. Listen to the Sportsbookreview telephone interview you guys have published on this site and at youtube. He doesn't sound so direct, so certain, he actually sounded misleading.

We can all talk about this until the cows come home... the problem I see is that he committed fraud 20+ times prior to this. Let's see who I can sting now! It's ridiculous. It's Easy Street's discretion if they want to pay him or not. We're not talking about an honest, credible, and worthy person. We're talking about an individual who had an opportunity to stay clean... stay positive and has chosen not to in the past. If you choose deceptive tactics... it will come back to haunt you. It's life 101.