1. 10-01-10 01:27 AM #1
    Goat Milk
    Goat Milk's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 25,838
    Betpoints: 10176

    Seattle ML

    No reason Seattle shouldn't be favored here. Jackson is not healthy and he is half their offense. If bradford thrwos 40 times against the Hawks he will get buried.

    If they announce Jackson isn't playing in the next few days this line will drop.

    For you trend guys:
    Seahawks 6-0 last 6 against Rams when they are favored.
    Seahawks 4-1 last 5 played in STL.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-01-10 01:52 AM #2
    icancount2one
    Let's go NickFolian Dynamite!
    icancount2one's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-05-10
    Posts: 1,507
    Betpoints: 571

    Hawks strike me as a team that's much more dangerous at home than on the road. Bradford's looking really good in the early going and who knows if Seattle lays an egg.

    No play for me, I'm just saying don't overlook the Rams as much as you could have last year..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-01-10 02:18 AM #3
    Dark Horse
    Deus Ex Machina
    Dark Horse's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-05
    Posts: 13,764
    Betpoints: 2

    I'm pretty confident STL takes this.

    RF's haven't exactly been stellar this season. STL has been quite disciplined about their balance between passing and rushing. And SEA has a lot of new pieces, so don't be surprised to see them intimidated on the road.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-01-10 02:20 AM #4
    marcoloco
    marcoloco's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-05-10
    Posts: 3,966
    Betpoints: 9132

    i agree w/ goat milk. jump on seattle now, especially with the rams best weapon in sjax most likely not playing, and if he does he wont be near 100%
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-01-10 02:23 AM #5
    Goat Milk
    Goat Milk's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 25,838
    Betpoints: 10176

    No way rams win if Jackson doesn't play.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-02-10 06:43 PM #6
    Goat Milk
    Goat Milk's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-24-10
    Posts: 25,838
    Betpoints: 10176

    ml changes
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-02-10 06:59 PM #7
    plzkthx
    plzkthx's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-24-09
    Posts: 487
    Betpoints: 39

    hawks all the way. already made my bet
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-02-10 07:00 PM #8
    Limey
    3-3 so far this season
    Limey's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-09
    Posts: 382
    Betpoints: 161

    Steven Jackson accounted for only 48 of St Louis's 365 yards last Sunday as they went about beating Washington, arguably a better team than Seattle.

    Just my two cents.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-02-10 08:18 PM #9
    spargament
    KHABIB
    spargament's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-22-09
    Posts: 1,739
    Betpoints: 367

    The idea that SJax's absence lacks major significance is laughable.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-02-10 10:56 PM #10
    Salmon Steak
    Salmon Steak's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-05-10
    Posts: 2,110
    Betpoints: 613

    Those stats were seasons ago when the Rams were garbage. They still are not great but better than in years past. You are right that Jackson will be a big factor.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-02-10 10:58 PM #11
    mv09
    mv09's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-20-07
    Posts: 800
    Betpoints: 2630

    Seattle sucks on the road.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-02-10 11:00 PM #12
    8ArIvd5
    8ArIvd5's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-24-10
    Posts: 3,175
    Betpoints: 1044

    Seattle's a different team because of a different head coach. I like your play GM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-02-10 11:00 PM #13
    cowboyfan08
    cowboyfan08's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-10
    Posts: 575
    Betpoints: 24

    Bol,goat will be on hawks also.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-02-10 11:03 PM #14
    isles71
    isles71's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-12-10
    Posts: 439
    Betpoints: 6

    Definetly on the hawks. The Rams are better but stand no chance.

    Bradford is good and Jackson is a good running back, but mostly the Rams are the worst. Really bad and maaaaay go 4-12 or more likely 3-13.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-02-10 11:08 PM #15
    Limey
    3-3 so far this season
    Limey's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-09
    Posts: 382
    Betpoints: 161

    Quote Originally Posted by spargament View Post
    The idea that SJax's absence lacks major significance is laughable.
    Significant, sure. Majorly significant, I'm not sure. Stating that he accounted for 13% of St Louis's yardage against Washington is not an 'argument'. Rams played the entire second half without him and won the half 16-3.

    Again, his absence has to have some significane but I'd be very wary of basing a pick on it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-02-10 11:10 PM #16
    sharper2
    sharper2's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-30-10
    Posts: 2,724
    Betpoints: 6817

    im weary about Seattle on the road but if jacksons out im with you, seattle should win
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | NFL Betting | Next Thread »