1. #1
    johnnyvegas13
    johnnyvegas13's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-21-15
    Posts: 26,189
    Betpoints: 172

    packers -3.5 at home vs hawks

    anyone else shocked by this line ?

    i was thinking alot closer to a pk

    are hawks really gonna start the year 0-2

  2. #2
    2daBank
    2daBank's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-26-09
    Posts: 88,966
    Betpoints: 90

    im shocked you think sea is a good play.. should be higher, pack outplaed sea in sea in the nfc championship gm, are the better team on a neutral field and only laying 3.5 at home. line is short imo and yea sea wil realy go 0-2 to start as they suffer the same fate as most sb losers these days and have a so so season where they be lucky to win 2 road games. of course they will go 7-1 or so at home since they have a unfair adv at home but ya'll might as well stop sucking this team off cause they not going anywhere this year. or keep losing money on them, your call.

  3. #3
    lwindaily
    lwindaily's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-14-15
    Posts: 4

    Packer cover easy

  4. #4
    ThaTopMoron
    Body-Bags
    ThaTopMoron's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-30-10
    Posts: 26,554
    Betpoints: 6898

    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyvegas13 View Post
    anyone else shocked by this line ?

    i was thinking alot closer to a pk

    are hawks really gonna start the year 0-2
    Pats went 0-2 last year... Colts also went 0-2... although prob would have been different if for not very iffy no-calls by the refs with pass interference when they got a late game pick. but, Vegas gotta make the early season moolah

  5. #5
    R.P. McMurphy
    Update your status
    R.P. McMurphy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-15-12
    Posts: 9,654
    Betpoints: 175

    Schedule makers going brutal on Seahags to start season with 2 tough roadies. Beautiful revenge spot for Pack who you gotta love at home catching a low #, and terrible spot for Hags who are not same team on road. Also factor in fatigue a bit you know they had to exert more clawing back into that gm. Then it goes to overtime and anytime you play a tough smash mouth team like Stl your gonna really feel it all week.
    Last edited by R.P. McMurphy; 09-14-15 at 11:45 AM.

  6. #6
    meader99
    meader99's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-10
    Posts: 4,223
    Betpoints: 5231

    Kam sitting back hoping Rodgers lights em up and he cashes in before week 3.

  7. #7
    GoCougs!
    GoCougs!'s Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-11-10
    Posts: 953
    Betpoints: 11316

    I would take GB up to -7 for this game. Seahawks O-line is a jumbled mess. The WR's cannot get separation. Bobby Wagner is playing MLB like he is stuck in mud and our secondary is not as good w/o Kam.

    This game won't be close.

  8. #8
    WildCelticsFan
    Update your status
    WildCelticsFan's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-19-14
    Posts: 5,420
    Betpoints: 11919

    I wad expecting line to be like -6 for pack...and im a big seahawks fan, Packers seem like easiest money ever...

  9. #9
    johnnyvegas13
    johnnyvegas13's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-21-15
    Posts: 26,189
    Betpoints: 172

    I have no bet on this game

    but i do have a feeling alot of packer backers are gonna eat cheese in this one

  10. #10
    pilebuck13
    pilebuck13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-15-15
    Posts: 17,889
    Betpoints: 1717

    Lol sounds like a bunch of Seattle haters...since when is there such thing as a un fair homefield advantage lol seriously....tell me Bennett and Irving don't terrorize Rodgers today Wagner will be fine and lynch will have a big game lets see I'll take Seattle +3 all day

  11. #11
    johnnyvegas13
    johnnyvegas13's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 05-21-15
    Posts: 26,189
    Betpoints: 172

    ^ agree hawks +3 is prolly the best play

    also maybe under 49 ...

Top