1. #1
    will2survive
    STAY IN YO LANE!
    will2survive's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,106
    Betpoints: 22

    About to lose Orlando -1200 in a parlay...

    never again...for fukkin peanuts

  2. #2
    drfunkmaster
    printing it
    drfunkmaster's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-29-08
    Posts: 11,162
    Betpoints: 1065

    hell yah pistons!!!!!!!!!!

  3. #3
    LordVodka
    LordVodka's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-17-09
    Posts: 5,206
    Betpoints: 156

    That sucks. Can't trust huge underdogs in the NBA.

  4. #4
    Hall2Collie
    Hall2Collie's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-03-11
    Posts: 462
    Betpoints: 158

    Seems pointless to have -1200 in a parlay

    Adds little value and just adds another chance at an L.

  5. #5
    Bradyd
    Bradyd's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-08
    Posts: 1,067
    Betpoints: 312

    Quote Originally Posted by Hall2Collie View Post
    Seems pointless to have -1200 in a parlay

    Adds little value and just adds another chance at an L.

  6. #6
    LordVodka
    LordVodka's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-17-09
    Posts: 5,206
    Betpoints: 156

    I gotta agree with Hall2Collie. Putting large dogs in a parlay is never a good idea. I always try to look for dogs on the ML. You only need two or three dogs on a ML to hit it big.

  7. #7
    sportman1313
    sportman1313's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-31-10
    Posts: 2,752

    lordvodka...I think you misunderstood what -1200 means bro. Magic were a huge FAVORITE...not a dog. Not meaning to flame, but maybe you got confused

  8. #8
    LordVodka
    LordVodka's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-17-09
    Posts: 5,206
    Betpoints: 156

    You're right I meant to say large fave. I only puts dogs on the ml if I do parlays.

Top