[figue]

AD and line<=3 and p:H and p:margin>10 and P:W and season>=2011

This one fares well except in the month of March.
Great example of the quirkiness of trends.
Looking at the other side today.
Good luck.

nice call slick

[b1slickguy]

nice call slick

Thanks, figue.
Good luck.

[Mako-SBR]

Nothing for me today, didn't like any of the few picks I had.

[green7]

Points are up this year.

What we want to see is how home underdogs do when the total is above 200 and the line is less then 5.



season=2013 and HD and total>200 and division!=o:division and line<5.



Add "and rest" and the results are even greater for team playing with small rest.

Best of luck to all if you decide to use this.

[tonywayne]

Here's one I like for today:

AF and streak=3 and WP>50 and o:WP<50 and season>=2009

[JAnthony]

p:margin after the third>=7 and p:margin<=-5 and H and rest=0

One from me too.

[green7]

p:ADW and -4<=-line<=4 and pvertime>0 and rest=0 and division!=o:division and o:rest>0

ATS:6-12-1 (-1.61, 33.3%) avg line: 0.1
O/U:13-6-0 (10.50, 68.4%) avg total: 193.6

[b1slickguy]

From KS trends.

season > 2002 and playoffs = 0 and ou streak >= 2 and o: ou streak >= 4 and HD
(remove space)
Even better with totals between 200 and 209.5.
Good luck.

[nash13]

Here are mine:

p: margin < -15 and AF and season > 2005

ATS:	124-68-3 (2.31, 64.6%)	avg line: -4.1
O/U:	96-96-3 (0.44, 50.0%)	avg total: 197.6

NHL

D and streak > 3

SU:	160-298 (-0.84, 34.9%)	avg line: 130.7 / -141.8	on / against: -$9,500 / +$7,746	ROI: -20.7% / +11.9%
OU:	189-234-35 (0.01, 44.7%)	avg total: 5.4

[JAnthony]

p:WAD and p:margin>=6 and H and 3<=line<=6 and season=2013

Interesting season trend worth looking at.

[JAnthony]

p:LA and pp:LA and AF and rest=0 and oS(L, N=7)>=6

[tonywayne]

p:WAD and p:margin>=6 and H and 3<=line<=6 and season=2013

Interesting season trend worth looking at.

Taking it back to 2009 shows a 65%+ on the Over and a 68%+ on the Away team to win SU.

[figue]

p:WAD and p:margin>=6 and H and 3<=line<=6 and season=2013

Interesting season trend worth looking at.

p:LA and pp:LA and AF and rest=0 and oS(L, N=7)>=6

2-0 anthony

[b1slickguy]

Great night, JA.
Really liked the angle on the 2nd with POR spiraling.
Good luck.

[OLY]

p:WAD and p:margin>=6 and H and 3<=line<=6 and season=2013

Interesting season trend worth looking at.

Gold.

[JAnthony]

Great night, JA.
Really liked the angle on the 2nd with POR spiraling.
Good luck.

Thanks!

[Mako-SBR]

Killing it, just from the queries in the thread alone March has been a 67% win month so far...

Great work guys.

[b1slickguy]

Killing it, just from the queries in the thread alone March has been a 67% win month so far...

Great work guys.

I had a good feeling a few days after you started the thread, Mako.
Especially after more posters joined in.
Hats off to all contributing to the thread in any way.
Good luck.

[JMon]

[green7]

p:AL and A and season=2013 and line<=8 and division!=o:division and p:line<2

[JAnthony]

p:L and op:L and A and rest>=1 and 0<=line<=3 and P:margin>=5 and season>=2010

An ATS pick for BKN v. CHA game.

tS(A, N=4)=4 and tS(L, N=4)>=3 and H and rest>=2 and oS(W, N=4)>=3 and season>=2007

An ATS and total pick for PHX v. WAS game.

[boydako13]

I don't understand..so what's the pick for these games?

[dmitean]

p:L and op:L and A and rest>=1 and 0<=line<=3 and P:margin>=5 and season>=2010

An ATS pick for BKN v. CHA game.

tS(A, N=4)=4 and tS(L, N=4)>=3 and H and rest>=2 and oS(W, N=4)>=3 and season>=2007

An ATS and total pick for PHX v. WAS game.

But out of three Wizards games (Wizards at home), the trend didn't work even once.

[GiveMeaBJ]

Can someone explain how to read this stuff for us simple minds?

[JAnthony]

But out of three Wizards games (Wizards at home), the trend didn't work even once.

You clearly have mixed up both trends. First one has nothing to do with Wizards.

[JAnthony]

Can someone explain how to read this stuff for us simple minds?

Sorry, man, but many things regarding your question have been explained over and over again in this thread already.

[dmitean]

You clearly have mixed up both trends. First one has nothing to do with Wizards.

Yeah, you're correct.

[dmitean]

p:site=away and site=home and -4<=t:line<0 and 20081031<=date and p:L and WP>50 and o:WP>50

Doesn't work too good this season, but Pacers as home team are 2 - 0 ATS under this trend and Heat coming in to such trend are 1 - 3 ATS.

[JMon]

p:L and op:L and A and rest>=1 and 0<=line<=3 and P:margin>=5 and season>=2010

An ATS pick for BKN v. CHA game.

tS(A, N=4)=4 and tS(L, N=4)>=3 and H and rest>=2 and oS(W, N=4)>=3 and season>=2007

An ATS and total pick for PHX v. WAS game.

Nice finds JA! Love the ML action on the first

[JMon]

I'll share one I hammered on the Knicks over last night, will probably do the same tonight.

We want to play the over on a shitty team (49-40 win%) that is currently hot, winning 8 or more out of their last 10. Look for total >=200.

total >= 200 and tS(W, N=10) >= 8 and 49 >= WP >= 40

gl if you play

[hyahya]

A and tA(points)>=102 and oA(ooints)>=102 and op:W and points>=100 and ppoints>=100 and month in [12,1,2,3,4] and season>2009

Nice contrarian angle as well given Clip coming off 3 non-covers while the opposite is true for NO.

[JR007]

Sorry, man, but many things regarding your question have been explained over and over again in this thread already.

hey ass-clown, I take offense to that, he's trying to learn, I have been gambling and bookmaking longer than all in this thread combined, maybe he nor I do not have the computer background that you were spoon-fed since grade school, take you attitude down the road, kid

[JMon]

hey ass-clown, I take offense to that, he's trying to learn, I have been gambling and bookmaking longer than all in this thread combined, maybe he nor I do not have the computer background that you were spoon-fed since grade school, take you attitude down the road, kid

Settle down there JR

[b1slickguy]

Can someone explain how to read this stuff for us simple minds?

Use your favorite search engine: sdql bible.

From there it's all learning the filters used to create queries.
Many of the filters are very basic, (HD = home dog, etc) however understanding some of the more complex ones does take time and really requires practice using.
If you would like translation for a particular query, just ask the author. Lots of good peeps in here that can help you along the way.
Good luck.

[JMon]

Use your favorite search engine: sdql bible.

From there it's all learning the filters used to create queries.
Many of the filters are very basic, (HD = home dog, etc) however understanding some of the more complex ones does take time and really requires practice using.
If you would like translation for a particular query, just ask the author. Lots of good peeps in here that can help you along the way.
Good luck.

this slicker guy, posed, and such a mediator . I would like to add. on the killersports page, under each sport and towards the left bottom, there is a PDF manual for each sport. Also, join the google group and use the search function (where most of my learning came from). Additionally, I have been gamble for 15+ years and the PC's were introduced to me in the ninth grade...lol (should tell you how old I am). I have evolved my life around SDQL as my sole handicapping method. After three or more year, I am still LEARNING it. After many years of trying to learn it and many, many dollars spent on trial and error, I am finally showing grand profits. . SDQL seems overwhelming at first (like most new things do), but it is rather easy if time is spent to learn it.

If any outsiders ever have a question on a parameter, just post it or PM me. I will be glad to try and help.