[NBA Maniac]

This Memphis team made close winning games against OKC, without R.Westbrook and won the serie, and general public got the idea that they are too strong to win 4-1 against OKC.

They won it mostly because of the S.Brooks stupidity, lack of getting new game plans and ideas to change things on the field. (THIS IS MY OPINION)

Z.Bo is 1 from 8 LOL
they don't have any 3 pointer shooters.... ( well Pondexter atm made 5 from 9, in a 10 team toal...)

I think OKC with R.Westbrook would smoke Memphis...
BTW S.Brooks still SUX... lol

[Pauulzcappin]

try in english now brother

[NBA Maniac]

try in english now brother

I think users can understand it....
But if you insist.....

MEMPHIS is OVERRATED !!

[NBA Maniac]

BigDofBA where are you ??????????

- OKC led by 6 going into the 4th quarter of game 2.
- Game 3 was tied with two minutes left.
- OKC blew a 17 point lead and lost in overtime in game 4.

I wouldn't say Memphis has dominated. With that said, the better team wins close games so no excuses from me. Memphis has just been better. Same thing with OKC against Miami last year. Three of those games were one possession in the final minute and Miami made the plays because they were better.

As for Brooks, I have defended him in the past but can't defend him this playoffs. He was clueless in the two games OKC had chances to win in Memphis. The offense was horrible.

He also had to resort to the Hack a Turk in the Houston series with 6 minutes left at home. That's bush league and the sign of a coach that has run out of ideas.

It's a horrible offense to have Durant dribble up court, run around, and then jack up a forced shot with two defenders hanging off of him for 48 minutes.

[NBA Maniac]

I think users can understand it....
But if you insist.....

MEMPHIS is OVERRATED !!

[NBA Maniac]

I think users can understand it....
But if you insist.....

MEMPHIS is OVERRATED !!

MEMPHIS is OVERRATED !!

la la la