1. #1
    heavypenguin
    Parlay for the lulz!
    heavypenguin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-13
    Posts: 166

    Brooklyn vs. Indiana!

    Which is the best pick here... Brooklyn +6 or Indiana -6 and why?

  2. #2
    vasilli07
    vasilli07's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-08-11
    Posts: 3,955
    Betpoints: 10601

    A meaningless game. I will lean Pacers as I think they want gather some momentum going into the playoffs.

  3. #3
    Sport_Fish
    Sport_Fish's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-10
    Posts: 4,079
    Betpoints: 2039

    It's a guessing game as to which team actually wants to win this game - both teams are secured in their seeds so no real motivation.

    Pacers are probably the play based on just the line, but probably best to avoid.

  4. #4
    PorkChop
    PorkChop's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 8,193
    Betpoints: 601

    People just keep underrating the Nets. Gonna ride them to a W once again.

  5. #5
    heavypenguin
    Parlay for the lulz!
    heavypenguin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-13
    Posts: 166

    Indiana-6 is the play!

  6. #6
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07 View Post
    A meaningless game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sport_Fish View Post
    both teams are secured in their seeds so no real motivation.
    Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.

  7. #7
    vasilli07
    vasilli07's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-08-11
    Posts: 3,955
    Betpoints: 10601

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.
    Pacers will have to lose all their remaining games while Nets need to win all games. Yes, certainly possible but a very very low chance.

    And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.

    http://thebrooklyngame.com/brooklyn-...hup-scenarios/
    Last edited by vasilli07; 04-12-13 at 09:32 AM.

  8. #8
    lucasdawg
    pro as sometimes
    lucasdawg's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-13
    Posts: 3,399
    Betpoints: 5519

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Not true, Pacers need to win to clinch 3 seed (with miniscule chance at 2 but doubtful). If Pacers lose, they could still drop to 4-seed, lead over Nets would be two games will three to play but Nets would own 4-0 season sweep.
    so a good play on pacers?

  9. #9
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07 View Post
    And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.
    THAT I never knew! I knew that division winners are guaranteed a top 4 seed, but I always thought that the one non-division winner in the top 4 would be treated equal in regards to tiebreakers.

  10. #10
    Brebos
    Brebos's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-24-13
    Posts: 1,209
    Betpoints: 271

    nets nets net, nothing but nets

  11. #11
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07 View Post
    Pacers will have to lose all their remaining games while Nets need to win all games. Yes, certainly possible but a very very low chance.

    And division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders.

    http://thebrooklyngame.com/brooklyn-...hup-scenarios/
    Ironically though if the Pacers and the Nets were to face each other in the playoffs later, I think the Nets would have homecourt advantage in the event of a tie. Division leaders automatically win any tiebreakers against non-division leaders in regards to seeding, but the team with the better record always has the homecourt advantage regardless of seeding and I think they use same tiebreakers across the board there.

  12. #12
    J_On_A_Roll
    J_On_A_Roll's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-09-13
    Posts: 289
    Betpoints: 1698

    Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07 View Post
    A meaningless game. I will lean Pacers as I think they want gather some momentum going into the playoffs.
    Only thing I can see.

  13. #13
    PorkChop
    PorkChop's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-08
    Posts: 8,193
    Betpoints: 601

    Boys this game is not meaningless. Both teams are playing starters and have seedings to play for. No resting starters here

    Also updated *Gerald Wallace is out for Nets with injury

  14. #14
    Brebos
    Brebos's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-24-13
    Posts: 1,209
    Betpoints: 271

    Quote Originally Posted by PorkChop View Post
    Boys this game is not meaningless. Both teams are playing starters and have seedings to play for. No resting starters here

    Also updated *Gerald Wallace is out for Nets with injury
    alica keys ass and tiddies look faptastic

Top