1. #1
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Vegas LOVES the BLAZERS tonight. Hmm

    Roughly 77% of all bets are on Boston, yet the line keeps moving down in Bostons favor?


  2. #2
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Noticed the same, it is down to 2.5 at my book. Pietrus and Wilcox both out.

  3. #3
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    It's unreal. Weird as I can fukking possibly imagine. I even tried to find some referee stuff that could back this up and I just couldn't. Refs are actually favorable to home team ATS.

    Doesn't get stranger than that.

  4. #4
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Play on the blazers?

  5. #5
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Same thing happened two nights ago. Majority was on TWolves, yet the line dropped. And guess what, TWolves still covered.

    I think Celts cover. Vegas trying to get the sharps to bite on POR. I won't take POR until they show me some type of life on the road.

  6. #6
    Pauulzcappin
    Pauulzcappin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-10
    Posts: 20,295
    Betpoints: 568

    Maybe, what the hell.

  7. #7
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy88 View Post
    Same thing happened two nights ago. Majority was on TWolves, yet the line dropped. And guess what, TWolves still covered.

    I think Celts cover. Vegas trying to get the sharps to bite on POR. I won't take POR until they show me some type of life on the road.
    Why would vegas care about a couple "sharps" winning bets when they have the damn near the whole public biting on their line movements. Vegas cares about money, not outsmarting a couple sharps..

  8. #8
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Quote Originally Posted by eyesickk View Post
    Why would vegas care about a couple "sharps" winning bets when they have the damn near the whole public biting on their line movements. Vegas cares about money, not outsmarting a couple sharps..
    Vegas knows there are a lot of people out there who watch for that line movement. Lets say Vegas knows that Portland will most likely lose by 10+ (which is very likely since they've been awful on the road), why not move the line backwards and hope to get some heavy money on POR.

    I honestly think that is what happened on Wednesday in Minnesota. About 65% was on MIN, I think books knew MIN would easily cover, so moving the line from MIN -2 to MIN -3 wouldn't have mattered much. Why not move it backwards (from MIN -2 to MIN -1) and create some RLM to get sharps to bite.

    Just my opinion.

  9. #9
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy88 View Post
    Vegas knows there are a lot of people out there who watch for that line movement. Lets say Vegas knows that Portland will most likely lose by 10+ (which is very likely since they've been awful on the road), why not move the line backwards and hope to get some heavy money on POR.

    I honestly think that is what happened on Wednesday in Minnesota. About 65% was on MIN, I think books knew MIN would easily cover, so moving the line from MIN -2 to MIN -3 wouldn't have mattered much. Why not move it backwards (from MIN -2 to MIN -1) and create some RLM to get sharps to bite.

    Just my opinion.
    What was the line moved to in this game?

  10. #10
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Opened at BOS -3.5 and closed at BOS -2.5. However Wiclox and Pietrus are both out.

  11. #11
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy88 View Post
    Opened at BOS -3.5 and closed at BOS -2.5. However Wiclox and Pietrus are both out.
    I was talking about the minnesota game your speaking of

  12. #12
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Quote Originally Posted by eyesickk View Post
    I was talking about the minnesota game your speaking of
    Oh it opened at MIN -2 and closed at MIN -1.

    Told ya. Books knew BOS would blow them out by 10+. Rather than moving the line up to grab a few more squares, they threw some RLM on the game and I'm sure a ton of heavy sharp betters bit. I've seen a lot of good cappers take POR tonight.

  13. #13
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Wow -- Blazers are getting buried.

  14. #14
    eyesickk
    eyesickk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-12
    Posts: 160

    Lmfao, glad I stayed away

  15. #15
    larry040681
    larry040681's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-05-10
    Posts: 2,813
    Betpoints: 3323

    16 - 0 by celtics.... hahaha nice moves by vegas..

  16. #16
    goduke
    goduke's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-17-10
    Posts: 11,576
    Betpoints: 2282

    Portland is throwing this game. Its so obvious

  17. #17
    moshi
    moshi's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-18-11
    Posts: 801
    Betpoints: 3525

    Ooo dodgy

  18. #18
    dlunc3
    dlunc3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-09
    Posts: 9,129
    Betpoints: 1076

    this is why trying to bet games based on line movement is pure nonsense

  19. #19
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    Quote Originally Posted by dlunc3 View Post
    this is why trying to bet games based on line movement is pure nonsense
    yea i bet portland solely based on the line move, bad move atleast this one's over early! just chalk up the loss and lets move on

  20. #20
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    Books knew BOS would blow out POR. Might as well throw some RLM on it hoping to get some heavy sharps on POR.

  21. #21
    dlunc3
    dlunc3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-09
    Posts: 9,129
    Betpoints: 1076

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbawks View Post
    yea i bet portland solely based on the line move, bad move atleast this one's over early! just chalk up the loss and lets move on
    not saying you did at all.... but a lot of people bet games strictly on that factor

  22. #22
    dRavidC
    dRavidC's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-11
    Posts: 2,516
    Betpoints: 6849

    burn for all those portland backers

  23. #23
    brahmabull117
    brahmabull117's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-10
    Posts: 8,622
    Betpoints: 42

    when will people understand line movements mean nothing either way? bet games based on what you believe will happen. Stop believing every line Vegas gives is either super accurate or is wrong because it's a trap

Top