would have been 2 shots for the celtics, 1 point game with the knicks at the line, probably about 4 seconds left.. and the celtics with NO timeouts....
Yep should have, but people have a hard time believing a shot will go in until it happens and their stuck with that stupid look on their faces. Man typically has no problem believing the impossible, but they have a hard time believing the improbable.
didnt even back the knicks, thats just pure stupidity .. i understand if boston had timeouts left and u didnt want to give them the ball at half court after the foul shots, but WTF , how is boston going to run down the court with 4 seconds and get a 3 ..
For some reason NBA and even college coaches think the odds of fouling a guy, having him make, miss, then get a putback are higher than a great 3 point shooter like Pierce or Allen making a 3 in that situation. Seems like a no brainer but you rarely see a coach employ this strategy.
Then in overtime when they were down 4 or 5 with 30 seconds left they didn't foul. That was their only hope, albeit it a very small hope.
fouling in overtime wasnt that big cause they were down 5 with 30 seconds. i just dont understand it, that whole team is a mess anyway so i guess you can start with dantoni
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
how does dantoni not foul there?
Reply With Quote