[rnunez91]

Indiana is 5-15 ats on 0 days rest.. Just a fact a few might not Noe

[sweetjones55]

Only thing holding me back on this play.

[kiefynugs]

i felt dirty when i made my bet

[rnunez91]

Same here bro, Indiana really pissed me off yesterday. There defense is horrable. And they couldn't score

[mikeyg]

Indy was brutal yesterday... but lets not forget who Detroit lost to. Indy is a really good play when you can buy them to -2 and get +155. Indy can still go to the playoffs and Detroit just plain stinks, home or away. It is the lesser of two evils and you are getting a great price on Indy

[rnunez91]

Indy was brutal yesterday... but lets not forget who Detroit lost to. Indy is a really good play when you can buy them to -2 and get +155. Indy can still go to the playoffs and Detroit just plain stinks, home or away. It is the lesser of two evils and you are getting a great price on Indy

lol if u wanna play around with that logic, indiana barely beat new jersey.. and new jersey barely beat cleveland.

[mikeyg]

And Detroit lost to both nj and clev.... What is the point?

[bleek88]

I actually think DET gets the Win.

[megacoolid]

Detroit might get the W probally will stay away

[Avenger]

Actually, Clev played well last night. Surprised me, thought they called it in for the rest of the season.

But I don't like Indy, I wouldn't be surprised if they fall out of the 8 spot. Something is wrong with their game (Granger, Hansborough, both terrible) and they haven't had time to correct it.

[ephi408]

Lakers lost to the Cav's.

Fade.
Lakers.
Now.

[ManBearPig]

Since everyone like trends...Both on a B2B

Since 2006, teams winning 40% or less or less of their games are 105-83 ATS (55.6%) vs. teams winning between 40%-60% of their games on the front end of a back-to-back. In essence, these bad teams fare well when rested against teams that are not in their same status or in the elite group.

How about the small home favorite, or those -3 or less? They are 36-40 ATS (47.4%) on the back end but an impressive 43-29 ATS (59.7%) on the front end of back-to-back games since ’06.

Small road underdogs, or those of 3-points or less, are 81-69 ATS (54.0%) in the back end of a back-to-back scenario since ’06. They are nearly exactly opposite, 68-82 ATS (45.3%), on the front end.

Home teams are a solid wager on the front end of a back-to-back scenario when laying 3-points or less, or when playing as the underdog. Combined, these groups are 149-113 ATS (56.9%) over the L3+ seasons. Alternatively, small road dogs of 3-points or less are the favorable play in back end games, 54% ATS.

[QUEST001]

Pistons the play.....In my opinion

[smarmy]

Detroit is the play here. Indiana is beat down right now.

[vyomguy]

ya. this indiana team is streaky...tread carefully.

[og4667]

Their su b2b record is better than their ats b2b record, don't put too much stalk into it. I think the game is a tough call l, taking the bobcats and mavs

[lunchbawks]

detroit is the play. not indy

[pronk]

And Detroit lost to both nj and clev.... What is the point?

alright!

[NBA_Brosuf]

I'm playing the under 203.5, is that ok?

LOL

[mikeyg]

Ok. I can admit when I am wrong but come on 37% from the charity stripe. Your ******* dog shit Indy. Thank god for the knicks or I would never win any money.

[Avenger]

I'm writing Indy off for the rest of the season and their my favorite team. They've got some tough games ahead of them and they need to get their act together to stay #8 against a HOT Bobcats (ya, those cats, they looked great today) and HOT Bucks team. I don't see them doing it.

Rumors of team chemistry being off... and Granger and Hansborough just suck right now. Can't rely on Hibbert to score points... can't win games if you can't score points. Doubt they're going to bring Dunleavy back. Just don't see it happening....