Davydenko wife questioned in tennis probe
Former Scotland Yard detectives working for the governing body of men's tennis flew to Frankfurt to interview Nikolay Davydenko's wife and brother about the match-fixing allegations against the world No4.
The investigators are leading the Association of Tennis Professionals' inquiry into the Russian's retirement through injury from a second-round match against the Argentinian world No74 Martín Vassallo Argüello in the Poland Open in August. The online betting exchange Betfair declared void $7.3m (£3.5m) of bets on that match after identifying suspicious patterns of gambling.
Davydenko's lawyer, Professor Frank Immenga of the firm Bird & Bird, said the detectives had questioned the player's wife about his ability to withstand pain. They had followed this line of inquiry because Davydenko had previously received prolonged treatment for the foot injury that provoked his withdrawal.
The fact-finding trip to Frankfurt on Monday was instigated after the Russian refused to volunteer records of all telephones owned or used by him when asked to do so under the ATP's anti-corruption rules. The organisation had demanded that the records be delivered within seven days. Davydenko, on legal advice, refused to cooperate. He has always denied any match-fixing.
"The ATP sent my client the telephone request when he was playing at the US Open," said Immenga. "He had to provide within seven days records of all telephones owned and used by him."
Immenga's advice was that the ATP's request contravened data protection laws since it would mean offering records of telephones belonging to family and friends. "He is a professional sportsman. He doesn't have his own mobile phone. He has a manager who does this for him," said the lawyer.
The dispute over the legality of the investigation has been referred to the ATP-appointed anti-corruption hearing officer in Switzerland, who must rule whether there is sufficient evidence to charge Davydenko. If found guilty of match fixing he could face a life ban. Lawyers for the ATP will state that all participants in the sport agree to abide by its regulations and therefore waive specific rights to data protection.
While he waits for the hearing officer's verdict Immenga has demanded a moratorium on the investigation. "I have asked for this to stop until December 31 and then the hearing officer can decide whether they should continue or not," he said. "Nikolay is under economic and mental pressure. He has done everything he could; he and his wife and brother have talked to the investigation. Now they have been investigating for four months they have the names of the accounts of everyone who has bet on this."
Immenga claimed the ATP's investigators had told him that among the account-holders to have bet against Davydenko in the match against Vassallo were nine people based in Russia. He said the nine stood to make £725,000 from Davydenko's failure, adding that another two account-holders whose location was not known had increased that figure to £3.3m.
Betfair refused to comment on specific accounts yesterday and the ATP declined to confirm specific details of its investigation or the methods used. "Honesty and integrity are critical in our sport," said an ATP spokesman. "This is why we are engaged in a serious, comprehensive and thorough independent investigation to ascertain whether anything of concern took place."
The latest developments with Davydenko emerged only 24 hours after Germany's No1, Tommy Haas, said he suspected that he had been deliberately poisoned during a Davis Cup semi-final tie in Russia in September.
Betting player banned
Italy's world No124 Alessio Di Mauro, 30, has received a lengthy ban from tennis for betting on the sport, according to the Italian newspaper La Stampa yesterday. The sanction came after the ATP challenged him about an account he holds with an online betting company. His coach, Fabio Rizzo, said his bets had typically been between €15-€20 a time, totalling €6,000-€7,000, but that he had not been aware of the sport's rules on betting. "He has erred through ignorance and naivety," Rizzo was quoted as saying. Di Mauro was quoted admitting to betting but "not on matches and tournaments in which I was involved". The ATP would not confirm the ban.