[xxx]

I will do a daily recap of each days action. 10 units is the max/game

I will count for any one game.

Your unit size will be the risk amount for the recaps

last night's results:

betplom    	3	1	18.5
ac1318    	1	0	7.69
dirtyjock	1	0	5.88
xxx     	2	0	5.59
figjam    	5	4	4.91
augustus	1	0	1.20
lexis    	1	0	0.92
illusion	0	1	-2.00
razorbacks1	2	3	-2.00
cobra king    	0	1	-2.00
pegasus    	1	1	-2.06
sundram    	1	2	-9.30

this week's standings:

betplom    	4	2	17.20
xxx     	3	0	8.29
ac1318    	1	0	7.69
dirtyjock	1	0	5.88
augustus	2	0	2.00
lexis    	2	0	1.80
pegasus    	2	1	1.76
figjam    	5	5	0.91
cobra king    	0	1	-2.00
rjt721    	0	2	-2.00
onlòóker	0	1	-2.00
illusion	0	2	-6.00
razorbacks1	2	5	-8.00
sundram    	1	2	-9.30

[xxx]

am putting my 10-0 streak on the line tonight with 4 plays.

10*colorado -218otin
5*san-jose -219otin
5*nashville+1.5 -252otin
2*los angeles +1.5 -196otin

[Augustus]

Colorado Avalanche -0.5 -127 (Reg.)

[betplom]

Regulation Time Plays:

5* Washington Capitals +0.5 +157
5* Philadelphia Flyers +0.5 +150
5* San Jose Sharks -0.5 -127
5* Colorado Avalanche -0.5 -127
5* Dallas Stars -0.5 +100

Overtime Included Plays:
10* Nashville Predators +107

All lines from Pinny @ 5:30AM

[Razorbacks1]

Washington +1 1/2 (even) at Buffalo..2 units
Philly + 1 1/2 (-120) at NY Rangers..2.4 units
Chicago (+205) at home vs. San Jose..2 units
Edmonton (+200) at home vs. Colorado..2 units
Los Angeles (+145) at home vs. Dallas..2 units

Sure hope the home dogs bark tonight and not whimper

GL E1!!

[AC1318]

Vancouver -120 10*

can't take colorado tonight the locals only giving out pucks I will not ever lay a puck and a half.
for forum weekly post add

colorado -210 6.3*

[Sundram]

These might be in the realm of the "too obvious," which concerns a bit. Am I missing something,folks?
10 units San Jose in reg -136
10 units Colorado in reg -127
Away teams -1 vs Home teams for 8 units (anyone mind if I play this? Most major books post this line).
Sundram

[betplom]

These might be in the realm of the "too obvious," which concerns a bit. Am I missing something,folks?
10 units San Jose in reg -136
10 units Colorado in reg -127
Sundram

After seeing St. Louis +280 beat Anaheim -320 in Anaheim 5-0 earlier this year I know that NOTHING is obvious.

Remember teams that are out of the playoffs have young guys from the farm club trying to make an impression and earn a spot on the team next year, so they play tough. There is no pressure on them to win and the better team doesn't get "up" to play these lesser teams. Playoff bound teams would like to avoid injuries to their better players.

Look at how well Washington is playing since there top goalie returned recntly.

[AC1318]

These might be in the realm of the "too obvious," which concerns a bit. Am I missing something,folks?
10 units San Jose in reg -136
10 units Colorado in reg -127
Sundram

I see san jose at -235
and colorado -210
the reason something looks wrong is they are not the correct odds at -136 and -127
considering both of these teams are away from home ice these lines are correct
had the games been in san jose and colorado
sanjose would be -325
and colorado this is the highest line between these two ever in edmonton the line has only hit this mark and above in colorado
I wouldn't worry sundram
I feel colorado is a winner tonight
and san jose I don't have an opinion on but beleive me the lines are correct and placed where they should be.

[AC1318]

ODDS in general don't mean balls at least every other week dogs of 300 and above pull out wins. some teams just have the number of others such as detroit stlouis matchups love when this game comes around because you can take st louis every time even if you lose half the games stlouis wins half so at +250 3 times to minus 100 three times you are still ahead. I could never understand why people think if a teams odds are -280 they are a definite winner only to get hammered gambling when they take them. I know from baseball another matchup to relate is TB NYY bet TB ever time you don't know when it will occur but it will occur enough to put positive money in your pocket.

[Sundram]

AC1318, these are the correct lines, straight from the "Five Dimes" website. This is the old 1/2 goal line, where the team played needs to win in regulation.
Blackhawks got spanked 7-1 in San Jose last week, so it might be a bit of revenge factor, but I don't feel they have enough talent to play w/ the Sharks.
Sundram

Hockey - 5 San Jose (1st 60 min) -½ -136 for Game
Hockey - 7 Colorado (1st 60 min) -½ -127 for Game

[AC1318]

+/- goal lines can't be considered accurate charts to base a fishy line or not.
SU ML is the way to compare if a line looks out of whack.
As I said I feel colorado will be a winner tonight as far as SJ I have no opinion on.
may you have a profitable night.

[figjam]

Washington Capitals +265
Vancouver Canucks -119
Philadelphia Flyers +270

Philadelphia Flyers/New York Rangers OVER 5.5 + 108
Washington Capitals/Buffalo Sabres OVER 6.5 -118

all 4 units otin except for Wash +265 (2 units)

[figjam]

AC1318, these are the correct lines, straight from the "Five Dimes" website. This is the old 1/2 goal line, where the team played needs to win in regulation.
Blackhawks got spanked 7-1 in San Jose last week, so it might be a bit of revenge factor, but I don't feel they have enough talent to play w/ the Sharks.
Sundram

Hockey - 5 San Jose (1st 60 min) -½ -136 for Game
Hockey - 7 Colorado (1st 60 min) -½ -127 for Game

Heres my guideline when it comes to Revenge factor...its only a factor if the revenge team (in this case chicago) is talented...(in this case, they are not)
Thus i would never lay dough on chicago based on revenge factor.

[figjam]

Washington Capitals +265
Vancouver Canucks -119
Philadelphia Flyers +270

Philadelphia Flyers/New York Rangers OVER 5.5 + 108
Washington Capitals/Buffalo Sabres OVER 6.5 -118

all 4 units otin except for Wash +265 (2 units)

oh shiet!!! i put the wrong wager down...meant to play Philly on the puck line, not straight up!!! Damn...now i better pray. Anyhow still taking them on the puck line.

Philadelphia Flyers PL +1.5 -111

4 units otin

[Lexis]

Colorado Avalanche -0.5 -129 (Reg)

[Pegasus]

5* Dallas Stars -0.5 +102 (Reg.)

[AC1318]

Heres my guideline when it comes to Revenge factor...its only a factor if the revenge team (in this case chicago) is talented...(in this case, they are not)
Thus i would never lay dough on chicago based on revenge factor.

He had no intention on taking chicago
he was always on san jose

[Checkerboard]

Philly couldn't score even one for the over

[xxx]

lost my nashville play by 0.1sec.