1. #1
    PhatDong
    PhatDong's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-16-19
    Posts: 1
    Betpoints: 12

    Math Nerds ALERT! Need help!

    Going to use an arbitrary example here.....Also, lets assume that there is no minimum and no maximum bet at my sportsbook.

    Bankroll: $100k

    CIN (+133) v CHC (-153)

    But, lets say that I calculated CIN to only be valued at (+122, an 8% difference) and winning approximately 45% of the time, thus there is a bit of value to be had on betting CIN. If we use Kelly Betting, this obviously doesn't take into the very small edge we have and rather just the percent chance we will win; therefore I don't feel it would give us a proper and accurate percentage of our bankroll to bet. (I could be delusional in this and maybe it's not necessary to consider the 8% difference)

    How could/would you calculate how much to bet using both the percent chance that you've calculated to win as well as considering the 8% difference?

    Thanks all for the help!

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Optional
    Optional's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 06-10-10
    Posts: 57,806
    Betpoints: 9221

    Quote Originally Posted by PhatDong View Post
    Going to use an arbitrary example here.....Also, lets assume that there is no minimum and no maximum bet at my sportsbook.

    Bankroll: $100k

    CIN (+133) v CHC (-153)

    But, lets say that I calculated CIN to only be valued at (+122, an 8% difference) and winning approximately 45% of the time, thus there is a bit of value to be had on betting CIN. If we use Kelly Betting, this obviously doesn't take into the very small edge we have and rather just the percent chance we will win; therefore I don't feel it would give us a proper and accurate percentage of our bankroll to bet. (I could be delusional in this and maybe it's not necessary to consider the 8% difference)

    How could/would you calculate how much to bet using both the percent chance that you've calculated to win as well as considering the 8% difference?

    Thanks all for the help!

    The +122 you estimate gives you the 45% implied prob to win. The 8% is your estimated edge, and that's not a ' very small edge'. It's significant.

    You use the odds you can get, and the % chance to win to calc your kelly bet size. (that includes your perceived edge of 8%)

    Sounds like you are over thinking it a bit?

  4. #4
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by PhatDong View Post
    Going to use an arbitrary example here.....Also, lets assume that there is no minimum and no maximum bet at my sportsbook.

    Bankroll: $100k

    CIN (+133) v CHC (-153)

    But, lets say that I calculated CIN to only be valued at (+122, an 8% difference) and winning approximately 45% of the time, thus there is a bit of value to be had on betting CIN. If we use Kelly Betting, this obviously doesn't take into the very small edge we have and rather just the percent chance we will win; therefore I don't feel it would give us a proper and accurate percentage of our bankroll to bet. (I could be delusional in this and maybe it's not necessary to consider the 8% difference)

    How could/would you calculate how much to bet using both the percent chance that you've calculated to win as well as considering the 8% difference?

    Thanks all for the help!
    How are you getting 8%, is edge not 4.7%? +133 is 43%, so .45/.43 = 1.047

  5. #5
    u21c3f6
    u21c3f6's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-17-09
    Posts: 790
    Betpoints: 5198

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    How are you getting 8%, is edge not 4.7%? +133 is 43%, so .45/.43 = 1.047
    I believe he means that the line is 11 points too high and his 8% difference is 11/133

    Joe.

  6. #6
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by u21c3f6 View Post
    I believe he means that the line is 11 points too high and his 8% difference is 11/133

    Joe.
    OK but it is not 8% edge.

  7. #7
    semibluff
    Thanks for all the fish.
    semibluff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-12-16
    Posts: 1,475
    Betpoints: 18989

    It's not really helpful to say an 8% advantage since no-one will know exactly how you're calculating it. Is it the difference between the % of the actual odds vs the % of your analysis, 100% * the odds % / the analysis %, the difference of 100% * 133 / 122, 11 / 133, 11 / 122, or something else altogether. Saying the odds are +133, (42.918%) but my analysis suggests they should be +122, (45.045%), thus my edge is 45.045% - 42.918% is clearer and avoids such problems.

  8. #8
    TommieGunshot
    TommieGunshot's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-27-12
    Posts: 1,555
    Betpoints: 6350

    Quote Originally Posted by PhatDong View Post
    If we use Kelly Betting, this obviously doesn't take into the very small edge we have and rather just the percent chance we will win; therefore I don't feel it would give us a proper and accurate percentage of our bankroll to bet. (I could be delusional in this and maybe it's not necessary to consider the 8% difference)
    That is a 4.85% edge. Which is pretty huge. On most sports, the sportsbooks only get a 4.55%, so you're beating their edge. On baseball it is usually about half that. Casinos are perfectly fine offering blackjack games where they have a less than 1% edge.

    What makes Kelly Criterion possible is that any set of probabilities and odds can be used. Your feelings about being proper and accurate are completely wrong.

    Points Awarded:

    peacebyinches gave TommieGunshot 2 Betpoint(s) for this post.


Top