ANOTHER INEQUALITY, WHICH IS GREATER?
RUN LINE IN DECIMAL FORM(PERCENTAGE THAT THE RUN LINE WINS)
V.
MONEY LINE IN DECIMAL FORM X PERCENT THAT MONEY LINE WINS.
RL(%RL) >?
I WOULD LOOK AT ARIZONA'S WINS. LIKE JUSTIN SAID I THINK. HE DID NOT EXPLAIN WHAT A PUSH CHART IS, TO THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW.
AND SEE, HOW OFTEN DO THEY WIN BY ONE, AND HOW OFTEN DO THEY WIN BY 2 OR MORE.
NYM
L9-6
2
NYM
W5-2
3
NYM
W6-5
4
PIT
W6-0
5
PIT
W4-3
6
PIT
W11-6
7
WAS
L7-6
8
WAS
L5-2
9
WAS
L9-2
10
NYM
W7-4
11
HERE'S AZ'S LAST 10 GAMES. OUT OF THE ONES THE WON, THEY WENT...
WON BY 1 (MONEY LINE WIN): 2. WON BY 2 OR MORE (RUN LINE WIN): SHIT IT WAS 4!!!
SO THE TEAM, HERE'S THE THING THEY WON THE MONEY LINE ALL 6 TIMES THEY WON.
BUT THEY WON THE RUN LINE BET, 4 TIMES ONLY. OR 66% OF THE TIME.
SO PLUG 100% INTO THE EQUATION AND 66% INTO THE EQUATION, AND...
1.8 (-130) TIMES 100% >?< 2.2 (+!20 IN DECIMAL) X 66%
SO, IF WE AGREE THAT AZ WINS RUNLINE BETS 66% OF THE TIME (AND YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER HOW OFTEN COLORADO WOULD GIVE UP A RUN LINE LOSS, THUS FLUCTUATING THE 66& TO MAYBE 55% OR 70% OR EVEN 45%, WHTEVER YOU FIGURE. AND YOU COULD LOOK AT THE WHO SEASON, OR LAST 20 GAMES, FOR BOTH TEAMS, OR JUST AZ, OR WHOEVER YOU THINK IS GONNA CONTROL THE GAMES TEMPO....
AND 1.8 IS GREATER THAN 1.5 OR 2.2 X .66.