Originally Posted by
josie88
By proxy I think I've already done that.
Let me reason this out - please bear with me. I'm still a student of this.
Scenario one is that the system is created with a dataset of one season and applied to fresh data and produces profitable results.
Scenario two is that the system is created with a dataset of five seasons and applied to the same five season dataset and produces similar profitable results over the five seasons.
So, what if the technique to devise the system was scenario two, but upon further examination there was no distinction in results? That is to say, if I had devised the system from scenario one's strategy or two the results are the same?
You see, I can take the system, apply it to any one season and produce the results. My reasoning is, perhaps by coincidence, since the results can be duplicated with smaller datasets and by the whole dataset as well, then I have accomplished my task. The point is (sorry for rambling) had i never incorporated the other season's data, the results would be the same. And we still have the benefit of a nice sample size.
What do you think?