1. #1
    runnershane14
    runnershane14's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-23-07
    Posts: 803
    Betpoints: 84

    NFL Projections - Feedback Please

    I am posting my excel sheet with weekly nfl projections and the record thus far. I have been tracking for the year and have not actually made any wagers. I was looking for some feedback on how well it is actually doing or not doing. Do I have something or is it luck and regressing back to a coin flip? It has not done as well recently as it did in the beginning.
    Attached Files

  2. #2
    runnershane14
    runnershane14's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-23-07
    Posts: 803
    Betpoints: 84

    Any thoughts..finished 275-226 ATS/OU at 54.89% for 26.4 units of profit.
    Attached Files

  3. #3
    JustinBieber
    JustinBieber's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-16-10
    Posts: 324
    Betpoints: 149

    Your attachment is just your results which you already stated. Unless you are lying to yourself and fabricating results it looks very promising considering you have a fairly large sample size.

    My rough calculations show your results are roughly 1 in 100 to be winning because of luck. Perhaps I did this wrong though so get somebody else to confirm.

  4. #4
    samserif
    samserif's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-19-11
    Posts: 63
    Betpoints: 165

    This issue is addressed in each of the three major books on sports betting (Stanford Wong, King Yao, Justin7). The Stanford Wong book has a table titled "Rarity of Good W-L Records" and for 500 samples, it shows the chances that the following W-L records were created by chance:

    1:100 - 277-233
    1:1000 - 285-215
    1:10,000 - 292-208

    (Good calculating, JustinBieber!)

    Wong recommends that if you're using historical data, hold out for 1:1000 chance of a W-L record being by chance alone. At 1,000 sample, the 1:1000 record works out to be 549-451.

  5. #5
    brandonlewis
    brandonlewis's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-15-12
    Posts: 3

    i never buy into this mathematical stuff, betting is not as calculated as thought of

  6. #6
    runnershane14
    runnershane14's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-23-07
    Posts: 803
    Betpoints: 84

    Bump, I'm continuing this for this season to see results..haven't bet any of it yet with real money. This spreadsheet assumes -110 but if I were able to get -105 then my profit jumps to 37.7. My other problem is that I am using a rating number that is derived by someone else and while I do not believe they will change their methods of getting the ratings, I wish I could figure out how it is derived. Any insight going forward this next season? Lost 3.7 @-110 or 2.85 @-105 units week 1. Any suggestions for books with -105 reduced on spread/totals?

  7. #7
    yak merchant
    yak merchant's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-04-10
    Posts: 109
    Betpoints: 6170

    Quote Originally Posted by brandonlewis View Post
    i never buy into this mathematical stuff, betting is not as calculated as thought of
    Yes I agree this mathematical stuff is only for engineers and smart people not gamblers. So how is betting "calculated"? or is it just thought of? I need to figure out how to nominate posts.

Top