[onlooker]

Two teams in my league proposed this:

T.Romo for B.Marshall

[BigDaddy]

that is a tough call

[Andy117]

Two teams in my league proposed this:

T.Romo for B.Marshall

A lot depends on what is on those teams rosters. At first glance it doesn't look too bad.

[BigSpoon]

A lot depends on what is on those teams rosters. At first glance it doesn't look too bad.

This. I prob would not vote it down.

[Grits n' Gravy]

Sure. Both guys will have a few huge weeks.

[GamblerSpirit]

looks fair.

[LT Profits]

Yes it is fair, both are relatively highly ranked at their positions.

[downsouth]

Not collusion so let it fly. Personally I'd rather have Marshall.

[dudekid]

fair trade, marshall has more value just for the reason that he puts up points at WR and QBs are easier to find...that being said nothing wrong with it (i have both on my team)

[me-first]

yeah, this one is fairly even..not sure who would get the best of it without seeing the rosters..

[Ghenghis Kahn]

no i'd veto

you can pick up bradford on the ww but who can you pick up to match marshall?

[mrmarket]

That looks like a fair trade to me!

[newbottles]

Without additional context, seems fair to me.

[onlooker]

It went through.

The guy that gave up T.Romo also has D.Brees and RGIII. So he isn't losing much with T.Romo. He will now have R.White, B.Marshall, and B.Lloyd.

The guy getting T.Romo has J.Cutler, and gave up on the Cutler to Marshall combo early. His next best WR up is T.Smith.

Both I guess are gaining 10 or so points a week with the trade.

[LT Profits]

no i'd veto

you can pick up bradford on the ww but who can you pick up to match marshall?

You can't veto a trade based on that, you can only look at the players involved in the trade themselves, and if it's borderline, then at the CURRENT rosters. You can't speculate on future pickups.

[CarolinaDaze]

A guy sent me this trade a few weeks back but i turned it down, today he brought it up again, tell me what you think? Matt Forte(Me) for Marshawn Lynch(Him). Its a PPR League with .25 per reception and 1 point per 10 yards. I was thinking Lynch had back troubles last year when i turned it down but with Forte ankle issues maybe i should consider it?

[onlooker]

A guy sent me this trade a few weeks back but i turned it down, today he brought it up again, tell me what you think? Matt Forte(Me) for Marshawn Lynch(Him). Its a PPR League with .25 per reception and 1 point per 10 yards. I was thinking Lynch had back troubles last year when i turned it down but with Forte ankle issues maybe i should consider it?

The Bears are now saying M.Forte doesn't have a high ankle sprain. Could be back for Week 4?

I would rather have M.Forte in a PPR league over M.Lynch.

It is like trading one unknown for another. M.Forte's ankle, and M.Lynch's back spasms.

Matt Forte - RB - Bears

The Chicago Tribune confirms Matt Forte's ankle sprain is "not believed to be a serious injury," but that his Week 3 status "remains a question."

It's hard to believe anything coaches say with regards to injuries, but it appears Lovie Smith was telling the truth when he said Forte wasn't dealing with a high-ankle sprain. With 10 days to heal following Thursday's loss, it's certainly possible Forte may suit up against the Rams, but it would be far from surprising if the Bears opted for caution and held him out until Week 4. We'll get a better idea of Forte's status when the Bears return to official practice on Wednesday.

[BigDaddy]

It went through.

The guy that gave up T.Romo also has D.Brees and RGIII. So he isn't losing much with T.Romo. He will now have R.White, B.Marshall, and B.Lloyd.

The guy getting T.Romo has J.Cutler, and gave up on the Cutler to Marshall combo early. His next best WR up is T.Smith.

Both I guess are gaining 10 or so points a week with the trade.

good to hear

looks like you got the best of the deal

[onlooker]

good to hear

looks like you got the best of the deal

I wasn't involved in the trade.

[BigDaddy]

I wasn't involved in the trade.

lol

well it was still a good deal