1. #1
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18710

    American football is over as we know it

    Did anyone just see that call against ND for targeting, then changed to unecessary roughness? Unbelievable.

  2. #2
    etothep
    etothep's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-14-07
    Posts: 1,299
    Betpoints: 6826

    I'm not watching Navy/Notre Dame if that's what you're asking

  3. #3
    Eddy Munny
    Eddy Munny's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-13-13
    Posts: 14,594
    Betpoints: 24938

    Yea u are dude. It's the game of the week.

  4. #4
    fecgp40
    fecgp40's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-01-11
    Posts: 5,750
    Betpoints: 5185

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensFan2k3 View Post
    Did anyone just see that call against ND for targeting, then changed to unecessary roughness? Unbelievable.
    I didn't see it, but I didn't have to. The whole thing with this targeting BS is nuts. There was a thread here on SBR earlier in the year about it. It seems like 95% of the time targeting is called and a player is ejected, they overturn the ejection but not the penalty, because the penalty can't be overturned. How penetrating stupid is that? If the ejection is overturned because it wasn't targeting, how can you allow the penalty to stand????? The whole situation just makes me sick to my stomach.

  5. #5
    RavensFan2k3
    Handicappin' like I'm Trappin'
    RavensFan2k3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-12
    Posts: 17,377
    Betpoints: 18710

    Im flippin threw all the games on...The point was a LB hit the ball carrier with his shoulder, in bounds, knocked him out of bounds, and they call targeting and unecessary roughness. It makes me sick.

  6. #6
    cmoney11
    cmoney11's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-22-13
    Posts: 773
    Betpoints: 1269

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensFan2k3 View Post
    Im flippin threw all the games on...The point was a LB hit the ball carrier with his shoulder, in bounds, knocked him out of bounds, and they call targeting and unecessary roughness. It makes me sick.
    That call was absolutely bogus. I mean come on. The fact that they called targetting on hitting a QB running the football is ridiculous in itself, but then change it to unnecessary roughness when he's hitting someone that's in bounds?! I'm so over this

Top