Originally Posted by Pivotpoint

1. Manziel was a relative unknown in Game 1 vs the Gators. Tigers have great defensive coaches and a great defense. These guys have plenty of tape on Manziel, now. They know his tendancies. Yes, he hasn't shown many weaknesses, but you can bet that Tiger D coaches have found some and will have a plan to exploit. They have the weapons to do this and their is no subsitute for experience or lack thereof.



No offense but that's the most square argument I've heard. Every college football player has 'tape' on them. You say he hasn't shown many weaknesses, but its okay because there is tape?


MV09- You are aware that he is a Frosh and that was his first game, right?

Every college football player has tape on them?

Maybe, but High School tapes of little value??




Originally Posted by Pivotpoint

If you were LSU how would you game plan? They are going to win in the trenches and just pound the ball and eat clock. Have to think Tigers will blitz often and hard, stunt and try to confuse a promising but young QB with an assortment of coverage packages.



Nope.



I guess those 3 INTERCEPTIONS were just an outlier? Pressure and coverage had no impact along with lack of big game experience.


Before you imply that someone is square, you might refrain from calling a victory for A&M before the game is over. That's the definition of square. Good luck with the rest of your card. Think you might need it.