1. 06-11-11 05:27 PM #1
    hels
    hels's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-12-09
    Posts: 8,767
    Betpoints: 1

    Judges in Vancouver are obviously retarded.

    Elkins with the decision 29-28, 29-28 and 30-27

    If you watched the fight and saw Elkins face when his hand was raised you saw how shocked he was.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-11-11 05:29 PM #2
    StanleySharp
    StanleySharp's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-11
    Posts: 645
    Betpoints: 24

    One of the worse decisions I've ever seen... Unanimous decision... are you kidding?

    Obviously fixed... the Canadian books cleaned up on that one
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-11-11 05:46 PM #3
    hels
    hels's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-12-09
    Posts: 8,767
    Betpoints: 1

    Quote Originally Posted by StanleySharp View Post
    One of the worse decisions I've ever seen... Unanimous decision... are you kidding? Obviously fixed... the Canadian books cleaned up on that one
    The decision made no sense once so ever in any regard. I often wonder if books 'offer' bonuses to judges if this or that happens. It obviously happened in boxing, so why not mma?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-11-11 05:48 PM #4
    lasker
    lasker's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-27-10
    Posts: 1,683
    Betpoints: 114

    Quote Originally Posted by hels View Post

    The decision made no sense once so ever in any regard. I often wonder if books 'offer' bonuses to judges if this or that happens. It obviously happened in boxing, so why not mma?
    I have no doubt that it happens, probably a lot more than people realize. Bullshit decision yet again.
    Last edited by SBRAdmin3; 07-19-14 at 10:10 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-11-11 06:28 PM #5
    SportsPedagogy
    SportsPedagogy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-13-11
    Posts: 3,691
    Betpoints: 266

    I thought Elkins won the first, 2nd was close, Elkins landed more punches, Omigawa controlled the center, even tho Elkins came forward more. The blood wasnt that big, sometimes one shot will cut you, but it shouldnt influence the whole fight. Round 3 was completely Omigawa. No doubt. it could have been 29-28 for either fighter, i thought Omigawa, i was pissed Elkins didnt use his wrestling more. Judges could have been paid off, but i think they would have kept it realistic as 29-28 if they were covering up a fix.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-11-11 06:36 PM #6
    hels
    hels's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-12-09
    Posts: 8,767
    Betpoints: 1

    Quote Originally Posted by SportsPedagogy View Post
    I thought Elkins won the first, 2nd was close, Elkins landed more punches, Omigawa controlled the center, even tho Elkins came forward more. The blood wasnt that big, sometimes one shot will cut you, but it shouldnt influence the whole fight. Round 3 was completely Omigawa. No doubt. it could have been 29-28 for either fighter, i thought Omigawa, i was pissed Elkins didnt use his wrestling more. Judges could have been paid off, but i think they would have kept it realistic as 29-28 if they were covering up a fix.
    The first could have gone either way but the second was controlled by Omi and he landed more shots. There were no kicks and no ground game/submissions so only the control/punches should have factored in which went to Omi. Third round wasn't even close and I would like to smoke a bowl of whatever is in the judge's pipe who gave it 30-27. He must have had a severe hard-on for Japanese boys.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Boxing, MMA & UFC Betting | Next Thread »