I stand by my statement of no abuse, since that would be intentionally delaying the majority of hands. Obviously not my case, apparently it was Eberetta's case.
The "reality" is I'm also multitasking while playing poker: I'm either watching sports, placing bets, eating dinner, taking a piss/dump, helping son with homework, answering the phone/door bell, walking the dog, talking to Mrs.Waves etc. Can't always wait for the 5 minute break to do these things.
So if there's a delay by me which isn't very often, then I'm most likely involved in the hand calculating pot odds or doing one of the aforementioned multitasks. I play the majority of hands at a lightning quick speed, which is simply amazing considering all of the other things I'm doing.
To question my integrity of the game is not only ludicrous, but baseless. If I wanted to manipulate the game, then why would I be in favor of correcting the H2H play?
It simply doesn't make sense. And according to the honorable Judge Judy... "if something doesn't make sense, it's not true."