[Triple_D_Bet]

Correct, it won't be anytime soon. The only way I would remotely consider, is if you somehow take the lead. Since that won't happen, it's business as usual for Waves.

Don't kid yourself bobbo; when I take the lead, you'll just rationalize it and find a new combination of criteria to reclassify yourself as the best, same thing you did after DS smoked you

[bobbywaves]

Don't kid yourself Tripe, the only one getting smoked is you. I can't seem to find you or DS on annual leaderboard: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

The difference between us..my talk is backed up by facts, not lies.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Don't kid yourself Tripe, the only one getting smoked is you. I can't seem to find you or DS on annual leaderboard: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

The difference between us..my talk is backed up by facts, not lies.

I doubt you'll find DS there any time soon; as everyone but the most dim-witted here understands, he has other things he'd prefer to do. Fortunate for you, since every time he's decided to try he's destroyed you.

Your terrible play is a fact. You bending over backwards to duck DS is also a fact. Posting the link for a meaningless leaderboard you're barely clinging to is a fact, but not a particularly meaningful one...not to mention, anyone looking back at your posts several months from now will be hard pressed to understand why you'd post the link when you've fallen back off it again

[bobbywaves]

I doubt you'll find DS there any time soon; he has other things he'd prefer to do

For someone who has better things to do, he's been playing. And when he doesn't play well, of course it's his old man playing excuse.

Your terrible play is a fact. You bending over backwards to duck DS is also a fact.

Both proven lies, as leaderboards suggest & I've already played DS. Will play DS again in January, if he decides not to hide again. Fact of the matter is, I outperformed your sorry ass ever since I've been playing.

[Triple_D_Bet]

For someone who has better things to do, he's been playing. And when he doesn't play well, of course it's his old man playing excuse.



Both proven lies, as leaderboards suggest & I've already played DS. Will play DS again in January, if he decides not to hide again. Fact of the matter is, I outperformed your sorry ass ever since I've been playing.

Sorry bobbo, we've been over this...the leaderboard shows nothing, except that you have a temporary lead, and your poor play is the big reason it's only temporary (just like you're temporarily back on the leaderboard itself before falling back off).

You already played DS, and despite playing on your terms, you insisted it was meaningless and refused to accept any more challenges from him, preferring to stall until January and trying desperately to set requirements so he won't want to accept and you won't be embarrassed again.

Lastly, I'd advise you not to confuse variance and frequency with skill, except that's pretty much all you do...so continue by all means; eventually, everything will make sense to you (such as why nobody is willing to bet you a +200 with a lead, why almost everyone who pays attention knows you're ducking DS, etc)

[bobbywaves]

the leaderboard shows nothing, except that you have a temporary lead, and your poor play is the big reason it's only temporary (just like you're temporarily back on the leaderboard itself before falling back off

Tripe...you've never been on the top 15 annual board & never will, since only the elite make it. While I've been the model of consistency, top 10 last year & this year.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Tripe...you've never been on the top 15 annual board & never will, since only the elite make it. While I've been the model of consistency, top 10 last year & this year.

The model of "consistency", placing every year (well, except for the ones where you didn't, and this year of course because it's not finished)...so what you mean to say was "I managed to limp on to the leaderboard last year, therefore I'm elite!"?!?

The entire reason for an annual contest was to give some kind of reason to be on a leaderboard. Your presence on it last year was assuredly only because there's $0 and 0 points associated with being on it, and as a result, the players here who are better than you (can easily think of 15 off the top of my head) have no motivation to give a damn...leaving you in a position to claim a spot on the leaderboard, earning 10-20% of minimum wage in the process and proving nothing except that in a made-up contest where you're the only one trying to win, 9 other people still beat you

[bobbywaves]

The model of "consistency", placing every year (well, except for the ones where you didn't, and this year of course because it's not finished).

There weren't any years "I didn't" while playing the full year, like last year & will again this year. Obviously you need to belittle the accomplishment, as you obviously can't accomplish it.

Therefore, the challenge to prove my superiority & dominance over you.

[Triple_D_Bet]

There weren't any years "I didn't" while playing the full year, like last year & will again this year. Obviously you need to belittle the accomplishment, as you obviously can't accomplish it.

Therefore, the challenge to prove my superiority & dominance over you.

So when others beat you because you're not playing, it doesn't count; when you beat other people because they're not playing, they're chumps and not elite? You take one data point and call that "consistency"?

Again bobbo: you made up a secret contest with 0 prizes where you were the only person trying to win...and you still got beat badly If your luck holds out long enough to actually win our contest, you'd at least have the beginnings of "consistency" (even when all it shows is that you can beat people who aren't playing)

[bobbywaves]

Whatever delusions make you feel good Tripe. For the few years I've been playing you've never been ahead of me, you never made an annual leaderboard, you never had the most annual cashes like I did last year & again this year. These are all facts.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Whatever delusions make you feel good Tripe. For the few years I've been playing you've never been ahead of me, you never made an annual leaderboard, you never had the most annual cashes like I did last year & again this year. These are all facts.

Shrug, and yet I've won waaay more points here than you have, spending less time to do so...takes a "special" kinda guy to pat himself on the back for winning less than someone and taking longer to do it. Again, congrats on beating me and others in contests we weren't playing. It's quite an accomplishment, taking 10th place in a contest where you're the only one playing

[bobbywaves]

You have lost waaay more pts than me, as my ROI is 5x yours. Who are you kidding? You're playing this contest & getting absolutely crushed. A tough lesson for you to learn, that will ultimately cost you 29k. If we had this same challenge last year, you would have been dominated as well. Again, these are all facts.

[Mitchell88]

Bobby have a good memorial day weekend. Go outside get some sun

[bobbywaves]

Will do...raining now.

[Triple_D_Bet]

You have lost waaay more pts than me, as my ROI is 5x yours. Who are you kidding? You're playing this contest & getting absolutely crushed. A tough lesson for you to learn, that will ultimately cost you 29k. If we had this same challenge last year, you would have been dominated as well. Again, these are all facts.

Oops, try again bobbo...ROI is defined by sane people as the return (in this case, points) on investment (in this case, points and time). Your "special" interpretation of ROI (number of times and amount someone sits down at a table with) demonstrates a complete lack of how cash poker works; a bankroll isn't reinvested 10 times if someone sits down with it 10 different times....this is common sense to hose of us who have played poker for actual money (instead of penny-ante point poker and Facebook poker, like yourself). For someone who likes to use the excuse of "bankroll management" to duck contests, you don't even seem to understand the concept of a bankroll

Aside from all the ROI nonsense...it's baffling how you can consider yourself more successful than somoene making more points in less tim than you. It's like a guy scamming for food stamps bragging that he has a better "ROI" than Bill Gates, because even though the food stamp guy spends more time scamming for them, he doesn't do any "work". Not a perfect analogy, as I'm obviously not at Bill Gates' level and the circumstances of your "retirement" are only suspected...but the core concept is the same: you're inexplicably proud of spending more time to make fewer points, while taking 10th one time in an imaginary contest with only 1 active participant

[bobbywaves]

That's where your wrong, you obviously have put in way more time than I have. If I played weekends & ring games & had the same amount of poker deposits as you (179,510), I would have the same current ROI of 6 if not better. That means I would have withdrawn at least 1,077,000, compared to your paltry 234,765 & pathetic 1.3 ROI.

[Triple_D_Bet]

That's where your wrong, you obviously have put in way more time than I have. If I played weekends & ring games & had the same amount of poker deposits as you (179,510), I would have the same current ROI of 6 if not better. That means I would have withdrawn at least 1,077,000, compared to your paltry 234,765 & pathetic 1.3 ROI.

Oops, try again bobbo...it takes you about 2 hours on average to clear a little under 100 points from poker between dailies and chopping omaha h/l hands, whereas those of us who play ring games do much better than 50 points an hour. On top of that, your theory has another massive hole in it: if you ever grew a pair and sat down at a cash game, you'd be unable to win points; unlike the tournaments in which you're so proud of your mediocre performance, cash games don't get the pot magically raised by 500%

[bobbywaves]

You can try to sugarcoat it all you want Tripe, but the numbers don't lie like you unfortunately. Anyone can look up our poker transactions. Fact if the matter is you have a pathetic 1.3 ROI compared to my lofty 6. You're also losing our annual challenge by about 2,300. So keep trying to convince yourself your the better player, it's mildly entertaining.

[Triple_D_Bet]

You can try to sugarcoat it all you want Tripe, but the numbers don't lie like you unfortunately. Anyone can look up our poker transactions. Fact if the matter is you have a pathetic 1.3 ROI compared to my lofty 6. You're also losing our annual challenge by about 2,300. So keep trying to convince yourself your the better player, it's mildly entertaining.

Hrm...I have 525 points in trivia badges to your 0 points, so if I make up a nonsensical definition of success tied to that, I guess it proves I'm superior to you as well. So here we are, tied with one nonsensical definition proving we're the best for each of us....I guess for a tiebreak we'll have to use the actual methods everyone else uses to assess success and skill (win rate and playing style). I win more than you in less time and play far better than you, so that settles that

[bobbywaves]

You would be losing to me in lifetime trivia as well. I consistently cash out after 2nd question.

[Triple_D_Bet]

You would be losing to me in lifetime trivia as well. I consistently cash out after 2nd question.

Once again confusing "number of cashes" with "success"

[bobbywaves]

Once again confusing "number of cashes" with "success"

Consistent trivia & poker cashes, you can just call me Mr. Cash. Nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year as well. Successful players are found on leaderboards & have high ROI, something you would know nothing about Tripe.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Consistent trivia & poker cashes, you can just call me Mr. Cash. Nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year as well. Successful players are found on leaderboards & have high ROI, something you would know nothing about Tripe.

Oops, try again bobbo...many of the most successful players are nowhere to be found on leaderboard (and with good reason, as they crush cash games with winrates that dwarf yours), and almost all of them don't live up to your imaginary ROI definition. Only in bobby's world (where success is defined by looking at the few things bobby is good at instead of things that matter to the rest of the world) would a guy who spends so much time with mediocre results think so much of himself! face it bobbo: according to the widely-accepted definition of Poker ROI for tourneys, you're sitting at a measly 25% or so, with the rest being a gift from SBR. It's like a guy who plays only freerolls telling Doyle Brunson that he sucks because the freeroll guy has a better ratio of money earned to money spent...the poor idiot (you) might believe it, but the rest of the world knows better

[bobbywaves]

Sore losers like you need to trivialize exceptional play from winners like myself. I'm sure there will be even more lame rationalizations from you come January, when you officially lose. It will be quite entertaining what comes out of your mouth then, as it's already entertaining now.

All your talking will just makes my victory that much sweeter.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Sore losers like you need to trivialize exceptional play from winners like myself. I'm sure there will be even more lame rationalizations from you come January, when you officially lose. It will be quite entertaining what comes out of your mouth then, as it's already entertaining now.

All your talking will just makes my victory that much sweeter.

Exceptional play? Doesn't seem like it...if you're going to make up conditions for success bobbo, you might as well make them so you can actually be the best. Despite being the only person trying in last years leaderboard challenge, you barely cracked the top 10. Despite using a nonsensical definition of ROI contrary to any known business or poker use of it, you're probably not even top 5 in it. It's one thing to suck in actual measures of success as you do, but if you're going to play make believe, might as well pretend you're the best

[bobbywaves]

if you're going to make up conditions for success bobbo, you might as well make them so you can actually be the best.

I've done that Tripe, you just haven't been paying attention as usual. My primary goal has always been cashes & final tables, wins are a secondary goal.

I've obviously succeeded in this goal, nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year...currently.

[Triple_D_Bet]

I've done that Tripe, you just haven't been paying attention as usual. My primary goal has always been cashes & final tables, wins are a secondary goal.

I've obviously succeeded in this goal, nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year...currently.

Strange to see you finally admit it, but it does restore a little faith in the species...congrats on finally coming to terms with making up conditions for success Next thing we'll work on is recognizing when the made-up conditions are ridiculous...that might take longer, but hang on buddy, we'll get you there eventually!

[bobbywaves]

Next thing we'll work on is recognizing when the made-up conditions are ridiculous...that might take longer, but hang on buddy, we'll get you there eventually!

That will never happen, my strategy has provided consistent cashes & leaderboards. You may want to alter your strategy before it's too late, since it's clearly not working for you.

[BeerDog99]

I've done that Tripe, you just haven't been paying attention as usual. My primary goal has always been cashes & final tables, wins are a secondary goal.

I've obviously succeeded in this goal, nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year...currently.

I am sure eberreta is challenging you for this. Has your play timer been disabled like his?

[Footballtime]

I've done that Tripe, you just haven't been paying attention as usual. My primary goal has always been cashes & final tables, wins are a secondary goal.

I've obviously succeeded in this goal, nobody had more poker cashes last year & again this year...currently.

Boobie, you shut in penetrate, get out of the house and enjoy memorial day weekend...Also instead of talking about how great and good you are in poker, why dont you let the Men and Woman who afforded you your freedom celebrate thier day today? As much as you like to talk about how great you are in things, why dont you walk around whatever town your from and find a Veterans Pararde and understand what these men and woman have gone through to allow you to gloat about yourself pal....

Also i now i asked you before, but what part of jersey you from? My cousin is from around the Newark area, and although i think he is a bit older then you, you might of heard about him... Robert Vidal, check out his book bloodcaine.....Then realize how lucky you are most days when you can shit behind the computer and talk shit to guys without being worried about getting your ass whooped in real life.

God bless the service memebers and thier families who served to make the usa a free country, so the Boobie /wavro can talk shit over the internet...

[bobbywaves]

Also i now i asked you before, but what part of jersey you from? My cousin is from around the Newark area, and although i think he is a bit older then you, you might of heard about him... Robert Vidal

Trenton, never heard of your cousin...I woke up early today & went to cemetery, honoring my Dad who was a Korean War Vet. I agree, "God bless the service memebers and thier families who served to make the usa a free country."

With that said, don't need you to tell me how to spend my Memorial Day pal.

[bobbywaves]

I am sure eberreta is challenging you for this. Has your play timer been disabled like his?

He's smart enough to play a similar style, but hasn't been much of a challenge. Why would my timer be disabled? I don't abuse it.

[BeerDog99]

He's smart enough to play a similar style, but hasn't been much of a challenge. Why would my timer be disabled? I don't abuse it.

Well I have seen you intentionally delay your folds and that is why he got his timer disabled.

[bobbywaves]

Well I have seen you intentionally delay your folds and that is why he got his timer disabled.

You've seen me intentionally delay folding every hand? Only every hand would constitute abuse & warrant timer disabling. How do you determine an intentional delay, as opposed to thinking & taking the necessary time to calculate pot odds? Pretty strong accusation to be making, apparently the SBR brass doesn't agree with you.

Eberetta explained his timer was shortened because he was helping a disabled person eat chips, while he was playing poker.

[BeerDog99]

You've seen me intentionally delay folding every hand? Only every hand would constitute abuse & warrant timer disabling. How do you determine an intentional delay, as opposed to thinking & taking the necessary time to calculate pot odds? Pretty strong accusation to be making, apparently the SBR brass doesn't agree with you.

Eberetta explained his timer was shortened because he was helping a disabled person eat chips, while he was playing poker.

Not a big accusation IMHO. I find it sometimes irritating but nothing that is not seen a lot online.

Also I do not want to get into a big thing with you but in the times I have been playing on the same table I have seen your decision times increase as getting closer to the bubble. It has not just been for folding, it has been for obvious calls also.

Lastly, you discussing pot odds as your reason when you have been doing this with a micro stack (i.e. <5 BBs), is amusing.