Originally Posted by
portetdaspet
As far as I see it, the only way this system makes money is if on average these are +EV bets.
If the market is u7 -115 o7 -105 do you really think that it will be under more than 53.5% of the time just because the market is shaded that way. When the books take such their 10% edge, which is pretty big, why would they be systematically wrong with every total?
My guess would be if anything there would be more value on the other side as my feeling is squares would prefer the -115, but I have no evidence and doubt it would be significant.