1. #1
    AndrewMcCutchen
    AndrewMcCutchen's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-12
    Posts: 326
    Betpoints: 30

    Waino -166 @ Mets

    After seeing Felix fall to the Astros, is it safe to unload on this money line? I think I'm goin large

  2. #2
    jtmurray89
    jtmurray89's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-26-10
    Posts: 655

    Wainwright career vs Mets:

    G GS W L SV BS HLD CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA
    Career vs. NYM 8 6 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 40.1 37 29 27 4 15 40 6.02 1.29 .24

  3. #3
    riffraff24
    ...and out come the wolves
    riffraff24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-20-11
    Posts: 7,234
    Betpoints: 55

    Will the Cards hit tomorrow? No one knows

  4. #4
    upscope
    upscope's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-26-11
    Posts: 2,837
    Betpoints: 6685

    Laying that big of a number is asking for failure eventually. If you want to bet a big chalk like that lay -1 instead. Turns one run games into push but lowers the juice substantially & gives u a better long term chance to live & fight another day imo

  5. #5
    Bullywully
    Bullywully's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-16-14
    Posts: 215

    Quote Originally Posted by upscope View Post
    Laying that big of a number is asking for failure eventually. If you want to bet a big chalk like that lay -1 instead. Turns one run games into push but lowers the juice substantially & gives u a better long term chance to live & fight another day imo
    I fully agree on this; Wainwright is a very good pitcher but his track record against Mets is very bad. the price is not justified to go all out on him. Especially on the road, and Mets who are hitting the ball pretty good lately. Not recommended bet

  6. #6
    HardCore
    I Win Some, I Lose Less
    HardCore's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-05-12
    Posts: 3,615
    Betpoints: 72

    just play the under if you think waino gets the win because if waino wins its going to be a 7 inn 2 MAX er's and stl cant be relied on for runs like last year. Under if your playing stl imo

  7. #7
    OhMyEli
    OhMyEli's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-17-12
    Posts: 1,164

    Quote Originally Posted by upscope View Post
    Laying that big of a number is asking for failure eventually. If you want to bet a big chalk like that lay -1 instead. Turns one run games into push but lowers the juice substantially & gives u a better long term chance to live & fight another day imo
    Actually it really isn't. A perennial cy young candidate in the -160s is not terrible. Unless you play totals, you rarely get something underneath -200 for the 2nd ranked team(ESPN) with their ace on the mound versus someone like the Mets.
    Now of course I'm not going to play it, but I wanted to clarify that point.

  8. #8
    AndrewMcCutchen
    AndrewMcCutchen's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-12
    Posts: 326
    Betpoints: 30

    Thanks for the great insight fellas. It's all being taken into account. It's either RL or Under for me.

  9. #9
    upscope
    upscope's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-26-11
    Posts: 2,837
    Betpoints: 6685

    Quote Originally Posted by OhMyEli View Post
    Actually it really isn't. A perennial cy young candidate in the -160s is not terrible. Unless you play totals, you rarely get something underneath -200 for the 2nd ranked team(ESPN) with their ace on the mound versus someone like the Mets.
    Now of course I'm not going to play it, but I wanted to clarify that point.
    Rarely do you get underneath -200 w/ ace's?? Sure, if they r @ home. The Cards are not @ home they are on the road.
    Rarely, do you see a road chalk of -200 (especially this early in the season). Minus -166 on the road is a huge number & the Mets are currently above .500 & playing quite well. Minus 1r @ considerably lower juice is usually better option.

Top