1. 03-30-14 07:41 PM #1
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    At -290 14.50 for 5. Let's start slow and easy here with a nice win.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-30-14 07:42 PM #2
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    omg wtf..........
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-30-14 07:45 PM #3
    twestacott
    twestacott's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-02-14
    Posts: 1,044
    Betpoints: 5512

    ........ LAD lineup could easily put up 2.5+ in one inning once Cashner hits the pitch limit that they most likely have him on and this thing comes down to bullpens in the 6th.
    Last edited by twestacott; 03-30-14 at 07:48 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-30-14 07:49 PM #4
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    it's not even about that, -290
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-30-14 07:59 PM #5
    twestacott
    twestacott's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-02-14
    Posts: 1,044
    Betpoints: 5512

    Quote Originally Posted by leetreaper View Post
    it's not even about that, -290
    Thats what I was meaning...... that at -290 it isn't even that unlikely that SD gives up a 3 run lead once the bullpens come in to play. If you were gonna take that kind of chalk you would at least think you would want a situation that is a high percentage of hitting.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-30-14 08:01 PM #6
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by twestacott View Post
    Thats what I was meaning...... that at -290 it isn't even that unlikely that SD gives up a 3 run lead once the bullpens come in to play. If you were gonna take that kind of chalk you would at least think you would want a situation that is a high percentage of hitting.
    you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-30-14 08:04 PM #7
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    Yes lots of chalk, call me crazy but I have risked lots of chalk in basketball all year long so might as well in baseball. I mean to win 5 bucks heck I'll lay it. And go from there. I'm waiting on the series odds on 5d. I know they had them last year just hope they do this year.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-30-14 08:04 PM #8
    twestacott
    twestacott's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-02-14
    Posts: 1,044
    Betpoints: 5512

    Quote Originally Posted by leetreaper View Post
    you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...
    Nope didn't miss that point at all.... I rarely play anything above -150
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-30-14 08:06 PM #9
    twestacott
    twestacott's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-02-14
    Posts: 1,044
    Betpoints: 5512

    Quote Originally Posted by tsimmns View Post
    Yes lots of chalk, call me crazy but I have risked lots of chalk in basketball all year long so might as well in baseball. I mean to win 5 bucks heck I'll lay it. And go from there. I'm waiting on the series odds on 5d. I know they had them last year just hope they do this year.
    Assuming you win $5......... If you lose you gotta win 3 of these to get back in the black
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-30-14 08:22 PM #10
    allstarrt
    allstarrt's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-06-12
    Posts: 19
    Betpoints: 1587

    Quote Originally Posted by leetreaper View Post
    you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...
    This statement,especially the capitalized part, is retarded.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 03-30-14 08:25 PM #11
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by allstarrt View Post
    This statement,especially the capitalized part, is retarded.
    mmmkay...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 03-30-14 09:55 PM #12
    mlb
    mlb's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-04-09
    Posts: 10,509
    Betpoints: 12779

    -290 for that ... are you insane?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 03-31-14 02:27 AM #13
    allstarrt
    allstarrt's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-06-12
    Posts: 19
    Betpoints: 1587

    Quote Originally Posted by leetreaper View Post
    mmmkay...
    Hypothetically could be a bet one the board which in 90% likely to happen with odds at -300 (which implies 75% breakeven point) this would a would be a profitable wager right? There can be value in extremely high lines.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 03-31-14 08:13 AM #14
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by allstarrt View Post
    Hypothetically could be a bet one the board which in 90% likely to happen with odds at -300 (which implies 75% breakeven point) this would a would be a profitable wager right? There can be value in extremely high lines.
    Unfortunately you are incorrect but i guess you don't believe me...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 03-31-14 08:16 AM #15
    GiveMeaBJ
    WIN WIN WIN
    GiveMeaBJ's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-08-09
    Posts: 8,449
    Betpoints: 335

    Quote Originally Posted by leetreaper View Post
    you still missing the point, playing -290 in ANY situation is retarded...
    This is false on so many levels.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 03-31-14 10:46 AM #16
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    The point was to just track plays and see wins and loses for tracking purposes. Some might lay 290 some might not. I prefer safer bets, yes I know there is no such thing, but it's just my mindset. Good or bad it hit and hopefully is the beginning of a winning season.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 03-31-14 11:17 AM #17
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by tsimmns View Post
    The point was to just track plays and see wins and loses for tracking purposes. Some might lay 290 some might not. I prefer safer bets, yes I know there is no such thing, but it's just my mindset. Good or bad it hit and hopefully is the beginning of a winning season.
    good luck
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 03-31-14 11:31 AM #18
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    Thanks leet. Same to you. Will be following your plays as well.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 03-31-14 12:06 PM #19
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    On par with some of Leets plays here are mine for this morning

    236301050-1 3/31/14 1:05pm $7.25 $5.00 Pending 3/31/14 1:05pm MLB Baseball 901 Chicago Cubs +1½ -145* vs Pittsburgh Pirates (J Samardzija - R must Start F Liriano - L must Start)
    236300821-1 3/31/14 1:04pm $6.00 $5.00 Pending 3/31/14 1:10pm MLB Baseball 904 New York Mets +1½ -120* vs Washington Nationals (S Strasburg - R must Start D Gee - R must Star
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 03-31-14 12:18 PM #20
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by tsimmns View Post
    On par with some of Leets plays here are mine for this morning

    236301050-1 3/31/14 1:05pm $7.25 $5.00 Pending 3/31/14 1:05pm MLB Baseball 901 Chicago Cubs +1½ -145* vs Pittsburgh Pirates (J Samardzija - R must Start F Liriano - L must Start)
    236300821-1 3/31/14 1:04pm $6.00 $5.00 Pending 3/31/14 1:10pm MLB Baseball 904 New York Mets +1½ -120* vs Washington Nationals (S Strasburg - R must Start D Gee - R must Star
    Let's do this
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 03-31-14 12:23 PM #21
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    Better than the -290 odds from the other night leet
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 03-31-14 12:36 PM #22
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by tsimmns View Post
    Better than the -290 odds from the other night leet
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 03-31-14 12:37 PM #23
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Mets 3-0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 03-31-14 12:48 PM #24
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Gee gave it right back
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 03-31-14 02:19 PM #25
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    The Cubs game looks good for us right now. Do you do any series bets?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  26. 03-31-14 03:46 PM #26
    tsimmns
    tsimmns's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-13
    Posts: 677
    Betpoints: 1587

    So much for the mets.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  27. 03-31-14 03:50 PM #27
    leetreaper
    leetreaper's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-10
    Posts: 34,841
    Betpoints: 2140

    Quote Originally Posted by tsimmns View Post
    The Cubs game looks good for us right now. Do you do any series bets?
    nah, don't do those
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Baseball Betting | Next Thread »