 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Double Double Parlay Thread
A double double is a coffee with two cream and two sugar. It's how we do in Kanata. Experimental thread here with only parlays @4.00(+300), essentially two 2.00 picks parlayed or equivalent. No idea how this will turn out but quite frankly it may fail hard. I'll be using single unit bets so I'll at least get 100 picks in
. Cheers!
Good Luck bro
wtfcanada?Originally Posted by ohumad
Thanks Cap'n. Yea Canada haha.
Went retarded with the bankroll management in the other thread although still in the black. Give this a shot for a bit.
All one unit bets unless otherwise noted. The idea is to do all parlays and all above 3.00 odds.
@3.22
Darcis S. v Kubot L.
Verdasco F. v Benneteau J.
@3.17
Troicki V. v Kuznetsov A.
Melzer J. v Reister J.
Robredo T. v Mahut N.
@6.97
Stepanek R. v Janowicz J.
Tsonga J-W. v Gulbis E.
Here we go!
@3.24
Cornet A. v Hsieh S-W.
Jovanovski B. v Flipkens K.
@3.33
Muguruza B. G. v Makarova E.
Suarez Navarro C. v Lucic M.
@3.51
Kvitova P. - Shvedova Y.
Almagro N. - Rufin G.
@4.22
Giorgi C. v Cirstea S.
Stephens S. v Petkovic A.
i had a whooping 10 bucks after cashing out yesterday so i parlayed all 8 of your picks lol good luck to us!!! payout is nice on 10/1200 but took out almargo and but in ana I
@4.09
2-6 2-2* Woz
Wozniacki v Cetkovska
Makarova v Muguruza
Why would u bet on Wozniacki.. She's injured.
She's also a diva but yea broken now.
Yep. I hate when they keep playing even if they're injured. She should have given up in the first set so I wouldn't had lost this particular bet!!She's also a diva but yea broken now
@3.00
Sharapova 3-6, *2-3
Larcher de Brito v Sharapova
3-6, 5-4* Melzer
Melzer v Reister
Last edited by ohumad; 06-26-13 at 11:02 AM. Reason: insert score
+3.6u(4-4)
Risked:9u(all bets included)
Oh man – the enhanced double (you know what I'm talking about) went all non-non-void? : (
Aw yeaa DD.Go big or go on the internet. No but the one that mattered was. Which reminds me I have to note that when posting.
No I was talking about Jerzy & Business! The one that mattered, I assume...
Oh lol mind is dirty. Thought you meant the thread title and then referring to all my bets. Yes that's the one that mattered.
I believe it was made dirty by Naked Konga.
@3.48(No Void)
Halep v Li
Kanepi v Kerber
@3.34
Lisicki v Vesnina
Erakovic v Peng
@2.99(NV)
Martic v Pliskova Ka
Riske v Radwanksa U
@8.64
Pironkova v Zahlavova-Strycova
Vinci v Cepelova
@8.10
Robson v Duque-Marino
Zakopalova v Beck
@3.24
Kudla v Dodig
Llodra v Seppi
@3.30
Lopez v Mathieu
Blake v Tomic
Almagro v Janowicz
@14.14(.5u)
Vinci 6-1, *3-4
Vinci v Cepelova
Kerber v Kanepi
|
|
you are good ohumad keep working
I don't know about that but thanks old man!you are good ohumad keep working
Some tough ones fo sure!
@3.24(No Void)
Mannarino v Brown
Melzer v Stakhovsky
@3.58(NV)
Dolonc v Flipkens
Kanepi v Kerber
@3.86(NV)
Bartoli v Giorgi
Knapp v Larcher de Brito
@3.50(2u)
Suarez Navarro v Bouchard
Gulbis v Verdasco
@5.43
Puig v Birnerova
Stephens v Cetkovska
@3.40(No Void)
Troicki v Youzhny
Kvitova v Makarova
What is no void means?? And 2u??
I'm new guys plz forgive me.
Hi Joe, no void means the bet is still on even if someone retires; it's not voided (the person who retires is the loser). For my book listed as no void, as long as the ball is served the bet is still good even if someone retires. For others the first set must be completed.
2u is 2 units.
I like the Youzhny bet but I dont know about that Makarova bet. Kvitova can be tough on grass if that serve is clicking. If they have an over/under on that match, probably the Over is a safer bet. One of those sets might be a tie breaker the way these two serve hard.
Good luck though.
I love how Kvitova is @ 14 or less to win Wimbledon while Makarova is @ 151, looking at their odds in this match...
|
|
Yet others actually void. This is known as a void bookie...
Thanks MDF! I hate betting overs but I agree that it should be a close one. I think Makarova has improved from last year on grass so I like her chances. I realize Kvitova can tear it up but I don't trust her in this situation. BOL
@27.50
Kerber v Kanepi
Dolonc v Flipkens
Cornet 2nd set v Pennetta
Fk!Not even gonna put in scores.
4-1* final set Kanepi
Kerber v Kanepi
2-1* Dolonc first
Dolonc v Flipkens
on serve
Cornet v Pennetta
Last edited by ohumad; 06-28-13 at 09:49 AM. Reason: put in scores :p
@5.33 live on serve both matches first set
Janowicz v Almagro
Dolonc v Flipkens
Lol I took Cornet towards the end of 2:nd and got absolutely insane odds, then she chokes the last games of 2:nd and sucks some dick in 3:rd...
Reply With Quote
1923 gave ohumad 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.
