 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
do you realize how simplistic and useless the "math" you did in this thread is? its the equivalent of a 5th grade math class and has no bearing in sports betting.Originally Posted by Timmah2483
i never disregard someone as a square (there is a person on here that everyone views as square, but i think is pretty sharp), unless they throw utter nonsense out, which is what you did-- that even a beginning sports bettor would know.
i regard james as a top 5 capper on this site.
|
|
yes, the math I did in this thread is simple. however its not 5th grade math, Ive helped all my nephews and nieces with homework. its more like 8th grade math, but few make an effort to really get behind the numbers. if you think 55% is good, than you havent done the math, plain and simple.
when did winning %'s and future winning amount, become nonsense? Guys say you can win alot of money over time betting with this guy, and I give them his numbers as they declined, i gave them numbers of the risk vs gain in the time he has bet already.. if guys knew this stuff they wouldnt say such "nonsense"
how bout this math for ya... he was 32-16 in november (66%) 27-22 in December (55%)... using his current drop per month (83% decline) and number of games, he is likely to go 23-27 in January at (46%). Odds are 78% that this is accurate. are you aware of that? keep testing me and Ill put you on the spot for some of this math, because im pretty confident you dont really know as much as you let on.
(Man, what's up with your grammar? You're very hard to understand.. You ended your first sentence with preposition! Then you say you never disregard some as a square, Im not sure you realize that means "you never (ignore/not pay attention to) someone as a square?!?!?! that makes no sense. soo many things wrong.. I could go for days on this post... and its not that im making fun, Im not, seriously! my brother has dyslexia, but both of your posts make no sense. how do u use disregard wrong but regard right? Just use normal words, keep it simple. )
Great projections there. Cause we all know gambling results are very consistent from month to month and decline at a precise rate you managed to calculate using not so complicated 8th grade math.
If you think 55% is bad then you have not been gambling very long period. Dont care how good your algebra is, get back to me when you have 500 documented plays hitting at a higher %.
holy shit this is fukkin hilarious. this is how you determine winrates?
i'm glad i was able to quote it so others can see before you delete and edit like you do your plays
i'm fairly certain you are under the age of 20. Let me explain: I never ( apathy, brush-off, contempt, disdain, disesteem, disfavor, disinterest, disrespect, forgetting, heedlessness, inadvertence, inattention, indifference, insouciance, lassitude, lethargy, listlessness, neglect, neglecting, negligence, oblivion, omission, omitting, overlooking, oversight, scorn, slight, slighting, the cold shoulder, unconcern, unmindfulness) someone as a square [like everyone else on SBR does] unless I see proof they are ignorant, which is what you are. I suggest you do more reading and less typing.
I do not change my plays, i added the results.
Ur "fairly" wrong Im 28. thats great you have 31 words better than Disregard, but the DEFINITION is :ignoring, and the NOTE below where you copy and pasted the Thesaurus.com synonyms read:Notes: ignore is properly used of things that are present in our surroundings; but for things like rules, conventions, stipulations, contracts, the right word is disregard
"When replacing a word with its synonym, make sure the meaning of the sentence in the specific context is maintained as well. Synonyms are defined according to certain senses of words. "
Thats right, just because a word is a synonym, doesnt mean its a word that takes the place of a proper word, correctly!
you really want to try to turn this into a grammar battle since your argument sucks?
disregard means any of the words posted, take "brush off" for instance (or example). here, i'll also throw in other definitions for you along the way:
My statement(sentence) is I would never disregard someone(a person) as a square (non circular, 4 sides of equal length), like others(not me, but other people) do unless they show(give) me a reason.
I would never brush off someone as a square unless they show me a reason.
You really have no clue what you are talking about and sound dumber by the minute.
GL with your plays though, atleast now everyone sees how much of a fool you are.
Its funny you ask that... as I must ask, What does determine win rate? anything? luck/karma (if you will)... nothing actually determines win rate or success rate of numbers but Casinos do use this math to determine house odds. such as a Roullette, when black has hit 3 times, it increases the odds to hit red, much the same as 4 black hits, 5, 6 and so on. or a flip of a coin. the math starts at basically 50/50 and varies from there...holy shit this is fukkin hilarious. this is how you determine winrates?
i'm glad i was able to quote it so others can see before you delete and edit like you do your plays
much the same happens to someone who bets 100 times in two months... the tables turn the odds increase that he will decrease. if you limit your betting in half, the odds nearly cut in half. naturally the games and personal involved change the outcome, but its just a rough estimate.. not everyone leaves a casino broke, but if you never leave you will go broke. call it "Jimmy The Greek Law"
but to you and Demen...(two guys, whom I asked to let it die) this SIMPLE, EASY, WORTHLESS, NONSENSE math... how did I come up with 78% odds that he follows this pattern. you show me the math on here and Ill stop posting on this board all together. "put your money where your mouth is" as they say. anyone can talk trash, back it up.
wow, quit now
no i didnt wanna make it a grammar battle, but since you mention it... first you ended a sentence with a preposition (is), you said "you never (ignore/brush-off) someone as a square, unless they throw utter nonsense out"
first, it should be "throw out utter nonsense", not "throw utter nonsense out".
next we go to your entire sentence, "you never (ignore) a square, unless (they talk ignorant)" ok... Im assuming I am a "square" because you havent ignored me at the least. but then you say "UNLESS (they talk ignorant)" so the use of never and unless gives the assumption u either always talk to dumb squares, or never talk to smart squares.
reverse your sentence, ("I always talk to a square, But they talk ignorant") now yours ("i never ignore a square, unless they talk ignorant)
your not ignoring me, which would make it ok, but then u said "which is what you did"
so now thats where its confusing. Am I not a "Square", do I not "throw out utter nonsense" or is ur sentence suppose to read:
"I never talk to squares, unless they throw out utter nonsense, which is what you just did."
It would be benficial to you if i quit now, given you overlooked this above, by accident, Im sure. I think you just realized your over your head... I mean in debate, "stupid doo doo head; Seriously? really stupid; your not even worth my time; or wow, just quit now" are synonyms for "I dont have the knowledge to respond"
ahhhh, now I know way it doesnt sound right... "never disregard" is a Double negative.... dis- is the most rare of negatives, but you still must watch for them
I'll skip your other bs posts since you see where you "messed up", but I must watch for them? It seems to me YOU must watch for them. My sentence was/is grammatically correct and yes, double negatives are allowed if used properly, which mine was.
Why don't you go check my "why casinos stay in business" thread so we can leave this to james if he decides to continue his picks. I check his thread to see what he's on, not to read your shit.
u have just as much bs on here as me... and ur double negative is not allowed how stupid are you? and ur sentence is grammatically correct? except for the preposition ending the first sentence, a double negative and misusing "throw utter nonsense out" (should have been, throw out utter nonsense)
i dont care about casino's... go write another poorly written thread... leave betting to the pros, my whole purpose has never included you, this thread doesnt belong to you, you dont cap but you wanna tell me how to cap. if you cant do better than 55% than follow him! BOL to u
bobby, move all of our posts over here so we dont clog this thread any more http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/private-zo...ml#post8420363
thanks pal
you are literally retarded i havent posted in here in a month plain and simple. I had a good december but you insist to say i hit 55%. Well its more like i hit 26-15 but i just did absolutely terrible in the hawaii tournament where i went 1-7. Its my own fault though of course but going from true home and road games to all completely neutral site games the method to my madness was thrown off and I in turn did terrible. Since then i am doing great again, i post winners on a daily basis in sbrs best bet thread . Over the last two years posting in that thread im up over 50 units in college basketball. (strictly college basketball i lost all those back in bases) So saying that I would slowly be on the decline is completely foolish and quite the bold statement. Like i said come back to when you record is 65-35 in your thread and ill crown your ass until then shut the **** and stay out of my thread just in case i decide to continue it at some point
well as of right now, your 59-38, soo technically, all i need to do is go 60-37 or better.
nothing better than a guy who makes excuses, than owns up to it all in the same! but here is the deal. when talking percentages and odds, you dont include an overall in different places. in this thread, that's your odds! if you continue, odds are im right. its not 100% you could be slightly better... but you will fall off from 55% and you dont have to worry about 70%, ever again.
just because i hate you so much i might start posting picks just to make you look like an asshole and finally bury you
i'm sure alot of people would like you to post your plays...but don't worry, everyone already sees this guy buried himself in this thread
you guys are douche lords just post picks and talk sports
ok here we go 59-38 1/18/11
Illinois -4
almost positive i will be adding another play
James dont post plays out of anger. Like i said before, i liked this thread and was checking your picks, post these because you actually play them. Not because of some guy talking trash or to get followers.
i love it... well done james! nobody likes a quitter. demens, the guy says he posts everyday somewhere else, so only the post is out of anger not the picks.
you cant bury me. not while my thread has a higher %
EDIT: James Im clear all my "negativity" and posts off here, and ruby, please save/quote everything you wanna save on here that i wrote... I dont want any excuses or people blaming me.... i just want him to conitue to prove me right
you posted 5 picks edited all your posted and then claimed you won bets you lost, added parlays after the games started and said you bought a half point on every game you bet yet you still were playing at -110 odds. Its highly laughable seriously please now get out of my thread your a fraud and will be buried in less than a week not only by me but you'll do it yourself.
On another note im not posting picks out of anger they are my standard picks that will win regardless if i post them in this thread or not
I'm a bit confused here, where can I find SBR's best bet thread?
haha, james u can play that game but you saw my picks before i edited the results u know my 4-1 is legit, even if you choose to be a bad sport. the parlays and other live bets arent for people to follow, so i wait to post them. most 2nd halves and parlays are for fun.. not for someone to trust their money towards.
ANYWAYS, I never posted my Payout, i posted my pays, and the payout result of those games. it says "payout example" plainly at the top. if you notice if gives a lose for the Uconn game -$110 because thats how i posted it. I played it -2 taking a half. but I cant just change my posted pick, so when I say Im 4-1, its not a changed number.
from now on my picks post will not be changed. no excuses james
"such as a Roullette, when black has hit 3 times, it increases the odds to hit red, much the same as 4 black hits, 5, 6 and so on. or a flip of a coin. the math starts at basically 50/50 and varies from there..."
You realize that previous hits a on roulette wheel have no bearing on future hits don't you? The chances of hitting on a true roulette wheel never change.
the odds change everytime larry... EVERY TIME
dude, just get lost. Go deposit 200 into an SBR a rated book
JAMES, JAMES, JAMES.... my buddy! soo glad for the guy above who asked about the Best bet thread, so I found it... looks like someones went 9-9 since Dec. 25th. (213-211-12 to 222-220-12) soo thats 36-31 since Dec. 1st... ur new % is 53%...
*COUGH* keeps dropping *COUGH*
LOL, I have money in BetOnline which I know is a SBR rated book... not sure if BetUS is, but I have money in there also... but do I need that tag? I dont think i do. to each his own
you literally have no brain theres an assortment of NBA NCAAF and NFL in there god almighty if i were a mod i you ban you just for the fact your the dumbest fukk ive ever met
*For the 9th time already stay OUT of my thread so people can see my picks please and thank you scumbag
Last edited by james4512; 01-18-11 at 12:41 PM.
The odds do not change based on the previous balls landing on black or red, unless there is something unnatural going on.
I would like to hear your explanation as to how each spin would have different odds?
http://onlineroulettesystems.org/beginner.html best I could find on short notice, and care to search for.
its an old Roulette Strategy, where you pick either black or red, lets say red. you play $20 on red, if you win, you places another $20. if you lose, you place (double) $40, if you lose again, u place $80... because everytime the ball lands on black the odds of hitting red go up. If it hits black 7 times, the odds/% is up to 99% chance the next is red. its never 100% because technically u could get black forever, but odds are, you hit red before 7 times.
there you are...
like i said, do less posting and more reading. its clear you are a beginner. look up martingale system
No, you ******* idiot, that doesn't prove anything. It does not state that if you get 7 straight blacks there is over a 99% chance that the next is red. It states that out of 7 spins, there is a 1 in 128 chance that all are black (and that is not accurate because of the green on the table.
"At this tactic, you only place bets on the black and red fields. You randomly select a color and begin placing your wagers on that. Initially, you place your $1 on any field. If you win, then start again. Once you lose, then you double your bet on the succeeding round and that is $2. If you win, then you should begin again from one. If you lose, then you should double your wager once more. Thus, to loose, the similar color should appear 7 times. The odd is 1:128"-That is the exact wording on the site, glad you added your own spin on it. At no point does it state the odds of hitting go up depending on previous spins
james4512 gave RudyRuetigger 5 SBR Point(s) for this post.
Reply With Quote