1. 12-12-11 01:50 PM #1
    battle4life
    battle4life's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-28-11
    Posts: 1,907
    Betpoints: 8

    can some one answer me this question (with reason)

    why are the st louis rams +10 vs the seattle seahawks.......or another way saying it why is seahawks -10 vs the rams....how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-12-11 01:51 PM #2
    Darkside Magick
    Black Box Algorithm
    Darkside Magick's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-28-10
    Posts: 12,586
    Betpoints: 1258

    the number is off..i calculated it was about 5 points off...game and line is weird...no play for me
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-12-11 01:52 PM #3
    ngates815
    Hooked Nose J
    ngates815's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-01-09
    Posts: 13,845
    Betpoints: 0

    Be honest warrior.


    Did you graduate high school?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-12-11 01:57 PM #4
    battle4life
    battle4life's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-28-11
    Posts: 1,907
    Betpoints: 8

    yes ngates idk what the true line should be but 10 points seems a little off based on a few factors....the over under is 38 based on that number this game is looking like rams will score no more than 14 points


    i got -7 -8 tops tho 10 is high

    4 points for home field seattle very good team

    3points becuase seattle is better

    where do you get the next 3 points.....

    im not saying seattle wont cover but if you ran this stimulation 100 times i think the rams would cover more likly than not...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-12-11 01:58 PM #5
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    The -10 was almost understandable when it looked like Rams were starting third string quarterback that they just signed recently. The better question is why is it still -9.5 with Bradford now probable? Best guess is that Bradford is still gimpy and would probably not even attempt to play if second stringer wasn't out too.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-12-11 01:59 PM #6
    cant call it
    BAMA UP!!!
    cant call it's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-29-10
    Posts: 8,817
    Betpoints: 455

    Seattle at home. They have had an explosive running game lately and seem slightly dangerous.
    Sam bradford questionable. All signs point to seattle.

    I think play the under or nothing at all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-12-11 02:07 PM #7
    Br0nxer
    July 2012 Poster of the Month
    Br0nxer's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-25-11
    Posts: 13,665
    Betpoints: 888

    Quote Originally Posted by battle4life View Post
    why are the st louis rams +10 vs the seattle seahawks.......or another way saying it why is seahawks -10 vs the rams....how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......
    Do the world a favor and go take a nap in the garage with the car running and the door down
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-12-11 02:09 PM #8
    paco
    paco's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-07-09
    Posts: 62,873
    Betpoints: 7051

    Public perception and image of how Seattle dominated eagles last game.

    Seattle great at home

    Rams suck, qb not determined.

    Marshawn Lynch is running like Jim Brown
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 12-12-11 02:15 PM #9
    calmeat
    calmeat's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-04-11
    Posts: 1,678
    Betpoints: 1849

    my projections have seattle as 7pt favorites. And with possible 3rd stringer starting just add the rest of the pts .
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-12-11 02:18 PM #10
    veeds1690
    veeds1690's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-06-11
    Posts: 178
    Betpoints: 624

    Bradford starting. Lynch against one of the worst run defenses in the NFL, just something to keep in mind.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 12-12-11 02:19 PM #11
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,717
    Betpoints: 32400

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkside Magick View Post
    the number is off..i calculated it was about 5 points off...game and line is weird...no play for me
    Which formula did you use to calculate it?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 12-12-11 02:23 PM #12
    Heart
    Heart's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-11
    Posts: 301
    Betpoints: 1457

    how can you calculate this number and determine if it is true or not.......
    Oh that's real easy. 3 field goals and a half of a safety. Just go back and look at the historical information for safeties and you should be able to figure out the rest. Good luck
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 12-12-11 02:24 PM #13
    cant call it
    BAMA UP!!!
    cant call it's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-29-10
    Posts: 8,817
    Betpoints: 455

    Rams ML
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 12-12-11 02:27 PM #14
    ehp6737
    ehp6737's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-11-08
    Posts: 4,185
    Betpoints: 32

    Quote Originally Posted by ngates815 View Post
    Be honest warrior.


    Did you graduate high school?

    Is it confirmed B4L is "fightingwarrior" A.K.A. "stiffingwarrior"?

    If so this would explain so much
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 12-12-11 02:31 PM #15
    p19101
    Giants!
    p19101's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-17-11
    Posts: 1,419
    Betpoints: 24

    I wanted -7 to play ATS, I figured it might be -8 or -8.5, but it came even higher. I took -2.5 on a couple of teasers.
    Last edited by p19101; 12-12-11 at 03:11 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 12-12-11 02:47 PM #16
    k13
    k13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-16-10
    Posts: 17,543
    Betpoints: 1878

    -7 with Bradford
    -8 with feely
    -9 with whoever

    true lines
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 12-12-11 03:15 PM #17
    Mr Handicapable
    Mr Handicapable's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-23-07
    Posts: 6,067
    Betpoints: 174

    I think the Rams show up tonite but they did make Beanie Wells look like Adrian Peterson at his best not too long ago. I'm on the Lynch prop big again Over 100.5 (-130). He cracked the rushing prop vs Philly early 2nd quarter.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 12-12-11 03:20 PM #18
    SBRMAN23
    Be humble sit down
    SBRMAN23's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-07-11
    Posts: 6,902
    Betpoints: 1460

    Yea this line seems crazy
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »