Originally Posted by
The Kraken
I could've sworn Ray stated something along the lines of "I can buy into the idea of a historical jesus." Not sure where he said that but I vividly remember it.
The main point of your post was to look objectively at history and we will see that jesus was in fact a real person and there is more evidence he existed that any other person
But I'm confused because Ray wasn't denying it
I think you're being passive aggressive and the real point of your post is something much different than whether jesus existed in the human flesh. Your real point is that jesus is the son of god and we should all seek god with an open heart.
You're sneaky but you can't fool a fool