Originally posted on 09/27/2012:

Quote Originally Posted by sharpcat View Post
This would be the problem............no evidence exists.

J7 pulled a Wilheim IMO.
No conclusive evidence has been shown here. But there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence. Which still counts as 'evidence' in the majority of legal jurisdictions.

As a mediator, what would you do if one party started with one story, changed it, then claimed it was unreasonable to ask for evidence of which story was true?

Seriously, would you just find for that party at that point because there was no conclusive proof?

Heritage may be wrong, and Cory may be wrong, but how on earth anyone can be comparing Justin7's finding to Wilhelm in the EZ case is impossible to understand.

He had no other choice that would be better for Cory. It was deposits or nothing at that point.