[brahmabull117]

why do people bet in football in any form except for wong teasers????



I'm doing a bit of research over the last year and 2 weeks of football and I can't find a single week where wong teasers aren't ridiculously profitable. I consider wong teasers to be 1-4 point underdogs teased up, or 6.5 - 9 point favorites teased down



For week 10 of last year, wong teaser choices went something like 10-1




for week 9, wong teaser choices went 10-0




for week 2 of this year, wong teasers went 11-2



for week 1 of this year, wong teasers went 10-1

[ebbearsfb1]

Wong?

[brahmabull117]

wong teasers - small underdogs teased up, moderate favorites teased down



it's an unbelievably profitable form of betting from what I can see

[boeing power]

do alot more research and you will find your answer

there is no easy way to beat the books, they adjust

[barza01]

I'm doing a similar teaser this week with MIA and MIN...got them both at +10...hopefully your research holds true for one more week.

[crustyme]

like this?

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nfl-handic...r-weekend.html

[DrStale]

Obviously if you pick out random weeks you can prove your point. Your problem is you think theres always an easy way despite the numerous times posters with waaaay more experience than you have told you otherwise. When wong teasers became popular books made teasers more expensive, they will always make sure they are winning and the players are losing.

[brahmabull117]

do alot more research and you will find your answer there is no easy way to beat the books, they adjust

I don't know what else to research, Ive looked at 6 or 7 weeks and the numbers were insanely profitable in every week




I keep researching more and more and I can't find a week where the winning percentage is even at 50%

[brahmabull117]

Obviously if you pick out random weeks you can prove your point. Your problem is you think theres always an easy way despite the numerous times posters with waaaay more experience than you have told you otherwise. When wong teasers became popular books made teasers more expensive, they will always make sure they are winning and the players are losing.

I am looking at both weeks this year - extremely profitable




Ive looked at a bunch of weeks from last year - extremely profitable




can you show me one week where it's not profitable???

[SportsMushroom]

I don't know what else to research, Ive looked at 6 or 7 weeks and the numbers were insanely profitable in every week

usually, when a trend starts forming in sports, by the time that handicappers notice the trend, the trend ends or the books adjust

and that is how people end up broke

[brahmabull117]

usually, when a trend starts forming in sports, by the time that handicappers notice the trend, the trend ends or the books adjust and that is how people end up broke

from what I can see, wong teasers have been awesome for years and years

[cant call it]

Brahma, since you have done a years worth of research, you should have weeks 3-16 of last year, then throw in the playoffs, then the first two weeks of this year as you had said. Let me know how those other dozen weeks went on said "wong teaser" and I might pay a little more attention to what you say.

[iifold]

why are they called wong teasers...

should just be called fukkin "common sense teasers"...

[brahmabull117]

why are they called wong teasers... should just be called fukkin "common sense teasers"...

yep

[durito]

where do they find you morons?

[SportsMushroom]

thanks LB

[SportsMushroom]

where do they find you morons?

they recruit them at toys r us

[Dabeergod]

Something is terribly wong here.

[jarvol]

This kid has got to be related to JJ or Brock.

[t-wizzle]

If you bet teasers all the time it's because you're afraid to pick a winner without some help. Problem is that teasers aren't really "help"

[brahmabull117]

well has anybody here lost money doing wong teasers?

[DrStale]

I know you've been told this before, but if you actually want to learn something go into the Think Tank

[brahmabull117]

If you bet teasers all the time it's because you're afraid to pick a winner without some help. Problem is that teasers aren't really "help"

in pro football, hell yea they are



NFL Lines are extremely sharp due to the parity in the sport

[iifold]

where do they find you morons?

Go back to your cave...

You can't have it both ways...

One minute you hate people like Justin7 giving out "sharp" advice...

Then you get mad at our boy brahma for being square...

Who do you think pays for your deposits you fukk...

Give me your points you fukkin scrooge...

Thanks

[jarvol]

So how would a wong teaser with the Ravens have turned out last week? The Bears? The Chiefs? The Chargers?

[BettingWizard]

how can you admit that nfl lines are sharp, and then in another thread trash people who always pick underdogs

[brahmabull117]

So how would a wong teaser with the Ravens have turned out last week? The Bears? The Chiefs? The Chargers?

ravens line was only 6 so that would not be eligible for a wong teaser

Bears game - saints were 7 pt favorites so that's a win

Chiefs game - Lions were 8.5 point favorites so that's a win

Chargers game - Pats were 7 point faves so that's another win

[t-wizzle]

in pro football, hell yea they are NFL Lines are extremely sharp due to the parity in the sport

So what if you took the Steelers in Week 1? Chargers last week? Falcons week 1?

[jarvol]

ravens line was only 6 so that would not be eligible for a wong teaser

Bears game - saints were 7 pt favorites so that's a win

Chiefs game - Lions were 8.5 point favorites so that's a win

Chargers game - Pats were 7 point faves so that's another win

So if only using faves 7.5-8.5 and dogs of 1.5-2.5 as Stanford Wong designated (not this 7 you dreamed up) then the Colts would fit last week and it would have lost.

In week 1 the Steelers would have lost.

[SportsPedagogy]

like this?

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nfl-handic...r-weekend.html

I assume this link is a figment of my imagination since it was completely ignored ....

[brahmabull117]

So what if you took the Steelers in Week 1? Chargers last week? Falcons week 1?

Bro you tease big favorites down, small underdogs up. Chargers were big underdogs last week so they wouldn't fit this system (the pats were the big favorites and they won). In the Falcons game week 1, the bears were the 1.5 point underdog so that would have been another win


Steelers were the only wong teaser loss of week 1

So if only using faves 7.5-8.5 and dogs of 1.5-2.5 as Stanford Wong designated (not this 7 you dreamed up) then the Colts would fit last week and it would have lost.

I understand the traditional set up, but there are just very few plays that fall in that category. I think you can do 3-4 point dogs, and 8-9 point favorites and still be very succesful


and the colts were 2 point dogs last week IIRC, teasing them over 8.5 = success

[jarvol]

Brahma just use a 20 point teaser for all your points. Can't lose.

[brahmabull117]

Brahma just use a 20 point teaser for all your points. Can't lose.

what is that?? a -110 line on 80 teams??

[aznbluff]

-110 on 15 i think

[dabomguy11]

So if only using faves 7.5-8.5 and dogs of 1.5-2.5 as Stanford Wong designated (not this 7 you dreamed up) then the Colts would fit last week and it would have lost.

In week 1 the Steelers would have lost.

While I don't agree with how brahmabull comes across a lot of the time, it seems as if you are just arguing against his point just because he's brahma and trying to totally blast his point without even looking into it. I mean, are you really asking how the Ravens did if you had them in a Wong teaser last week? Neither the Ravens, Bears, Chiefs nor Chargers were "teaseable" if using a Wong teaser system. Obviously, teasers aren't the only way to bet NFL as brahma is claiming, but they are a valuable tool and you just look like a dumbass for completely disregarding them and attacking brahma. The difference between Wong teasers and 20 point teasers is huge, and you're making totally irrelevant arguments.