[curious]

1Q plays are:
Denver lost 1Q, won double up on 2Q
Dallas Win
Clevelandwon double up on 2Q
New Orleans 1Q Loss, 2Q Loss, Quadruple up on 3Q Wins
Boston Win
Lakers Win
NY 1Q loss, 2Q loss, quadruple up on 3Q Wins

HT losers
Knicks 3Q +1 -105 Win
Clippers 3Q -110 Lost double up on 4Q Loss
Miami 3Q Win
New Orleans 3Q Win
Sacramento 3Q loss, 4Q double up Loss
Golden State 3Q loss, 4Q double up Win

Take favs on the ML, take dogs + the points. This is a change from the way I was doing it. Taking the dogs + the points smooths out variance because you have fewer doubling up plays on subsequent quarters.

Martingale these teams on Quarter plays until you get a win.

HT losers rule is to bet the team losing the 1st Half to win the 3Q, if the team is a dog take the points, if the team is a fav use the ML. If this team loses the 3Q then double up on the 4Q.

Don't play either of these if you don't have a stomach to lay fairly large odds in the 4Q. Which does happen sometimes.

[mundane]

goodluck curious! people shld follow u. like betting 5 dollars! it shld be fun.

[curious]

goodluck curious! people shld follow u. like betting 5 dollars! it shld be fun.

Bet 5$ on a play that is something like 20-0 over 3 days?

[mundane]

i said 5 coz of this..

Don't play either of these if you don't have a stomach to lay fairly large odds in the 4Q. Which does happen sometimes.

but i guess ur pretty confident about this system that playing small or big doesnt matter to u anymore. kudos to that!

[schaapattack]

Do u have any college bb or nba plays today curious?

[africanroller]

These things are like pyramid scemes. Once everyone jumps on they will go 0-20. The third quarter rule has been working but once the refs catch on then that will be lost also

[DevilDog]

Mundane, you are EXACTLY right! When betting these types of progressive CHASE systems guys should start out small because if they don't they will be in for one helluva shock when it comes to the games that reach three or four quarters.

I have done some preliminary work on this system for taking the HT loser and then going with the that loser for the third and fourth quarter...the numbers are actually not overly impressive. Not counting yesterday and going back to Dec. 13 the tally was 62-16. That means 16 times if you took the HT loser and bet on them on the ML for the 3rd and 4th quarters you would have lost 16 times! Depending on those ML's you probably would have LOST money on this deal.

Now the way I ran the numbers is NOT exactly what Curious is doing and he has tweaked it some. But when betting progressive systems, especially when betting multiple games, you need to proceed with EXTREME caution.

[curious]

Mundane, you are EXACTLY right! When betting these types of progressive CHASE systems guys should start out small because if they don't they will be in for one helluva shock when it comes to the games that reach three or four quarters.

I have done some preliminary work on this system for taking the HT loser and then going with the that loser for the third and fourth quarter...the numbers are actually not overly impressive. Not counting yesterday and going back to Dec. 13 the tally was 62-16. That means 16 times if you took the HT loser and bet on them on the ML for the 3rd and 4th quarters you would have lost 16 times! Depending on those ML's you probably would have LOST money on this deal.

Now the way I ran the numbers is NOT exactly what Curious is doing and he has tweaked it some. But when betting progressive systems, especially when betting multiple games, you need to proceed with EXTREME caution.

Since the numbers you are touting are NOT what I am doing can you please start your own thread to discuss the numbers for your system.

Also, I told people if they were cautious not to follow me.

Thank You.

[curious]

i said 5 coz of this..



but i guess ur pretty confident about this system that playing small or big doesnt matter to u anymore. kudos to that!

I was playing this big from the very first day. My mentor taught me "You cannot win big if you don't bet big".

No matter how far back I studied this it was a winner. Over two full seasons it was a winner.

[DevilDog]

Hold on to your panties dude. You did mention that cautious people should not do what you are doing, I was commenting on Mundanes comment about starting small.

But to be honest you originally talked about the HT losers then being the play to get one of either the 3rd or 4th quarters...and the record simply is not good for a chase system.

I am just letting people know that they have to be careful with this type of system.

It looks as though you have tweaked it and that is great, because the way your originally posted is not that great. I wish you luck with it.

When you are betting this type of progressive system you should be at about 95% or higher....of course if you are getting dogs all the time that would not be the case.

[curious]

Hold on to your panties dude. You did mention that cautious people should not do what you are doing, I was commenting on Mundanes comment about starting small.

But to be honest you originally talked about the HT losers then being the play to get one of either the 3rd or 4th quarters...and the record simply is not good for a chase system.

I am just letting people know that they have to be careful with this type of system.

It looks as though you have tweaked it and that is great, because the way your originally posted is not that great. I wish you luck with it.

When you are betting this type of progressive system you should be at about 95% or higher....of course if you are getting dogs all the time that would not be the case.

I told people to be careful, so we got your point. Start your own thread and post your treatises on the evils of progressive systems. We get it, okay.

[curious]

take knicks 3Q +1

[strybie]

OK got Denv 2Q and now I am on NY. I don t have them +1, got them ML or -0.5. Grrr depends from sportsbook of course

[curious]

OK got Denv 2Q and now I am on NY. I don t have them +1, got them ML or -0.5. Grrr depends from sportsbook of course

Always take the -1/2 over the ML if the price is cheaper. You lose ties, so losing by 1/2 is the same thing.

[curious]

Knicks 3Q Winner!!

[curious]

3-0 so far. This one wasn't even close.

[seanjohn007]

what sports book do you use to get your in game quarter lines? thanx

seanjohn007

[bigboydan]

First off, Welcome to the SBR forum

TheGreek, bookmaker, 5Dimes all offer those lines sir.

[curious]

If the clippers lose the 3Q...double up on them in the 4Q

[curious]

doubled up from 3Q loss

[strybie]

doubled up from 3Q loss

for the first time ... this one isn t looking good and only 2 min to go

[curious]

for the first time ... this one isn t looking good and only 2 min to go

One loss after something like 30 wins. Who cares.

[curious]

Oh well, on to the next one.

[seanjohn007]

First off, Welcome to the SBR forum

TheGreek, bookmaker, 5Dimes all offer those lines sir.

thanx theres some really good cappers here, and not a lot of bullshit like other ones have.

k i need to get an account with 5dime, i'm currently at sportsbook nut they don't have all the in game quarters (like the clippers) i just don't like the hassle of depositing money in to 5dimes, id rather just put it straight in from my credit card, its probably nowhere near as hard as im making it tho. lol thanks guys

seanjohn007

[curious]

Doubling up on New Orleans 2Q

[curious]

Doubling up on Cleveland 2Q

[curious]

Doubling up on New Orleans 3Q

[curious]

Miami is HT loser, taking them 3Q

[curious]

Got Miami 3Q +4 at -120

GOOOO GOOOOO GOOOO

[curious]

Miami 3Q Wins!!

New Orleans 3Q Wins!!

[ZBOIZ]

I jumped on Lakers -4.5 (1st Quarter)

[curious]

I jumped on Lakers -4.5 (1st Quarter)

Dude, you have to play these 1Q plays on the ML

[innovator]

what are you thinking about boston sac 2nd half?

[curious]

what are you thinking about boston sac 2nd half?

I dont play second half lines.

[curious]

Boston 1Q Wins!!!