strange, the line did drop from 10 to 9 this morning but that shouldn't be enough for them to limit cash outsOriginally Posted by DJK
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
12-01-23 04:00 PM #36
-
12-01-23 04:07 PM #37
rodemaker for fla state may be out, why the fla state line keeps falling
-
12-01-23 04:25 PM #38
I'm on Oregon -7. I paid that juice. Oregon and Michigan are the teams who haven't failed me but once this season.
money makers
don't get fukkn hurt Bo
-
12-01-23 06:02 PM #39
i have leaned WASH + the points all week,
however,
ORE simply a runaway freight train right now in all 3 phases of the game (save for their D vs USC recently)
and i think they have the better coach and QB.
if if if you forced me to bet i take WASH plus the points based on neutral field and them feeling disrespected as big dogs to their rival who they already beat.......but NO PLAY for me.
GL to all who play this
-
12-01-23 06:30 PM #40
also, if both teams start out hot on their first drives and make plays and move the ball and score a TD... bet the live over at that point in time. then the defenses will settle in and start to make plays
live under 73.5 would be real nice
-
12-01-23 07:38 PM #41
i saw 2 clear and obvious holds on the huskies secondary as washington if they are going to allow washington secondary to.hold they have a shot
-
12-01-23 07:43 PM #42
Hate to say it, but Oregon is toast.
Looks to me like Washington wins straight up, so my hedge bets are in good shape.Last edited by DJK; 12-01-23 at 08:35 PM.
-
12-01-23 07:50 PM #43
Damn, Washington came to play.
-
12-01-23 08:33 PM #44
-
12-01-23 08:44 PM #45
looks like refs made up.for it bs pi on Washington gave ducks a td. would have been 4th and long
-
12-01-23 08:45 PM #46
Will there ever be a day when refs don't ruin sports?
-
12-01-23 08:48 PM #47
-
12-01-23 08:49 PM #48
Oregon +290
-
12-01-23 08:56 PM #49
If Washington loses that phantom PI call will get talked about
worst I seen in a while
-
12-01-23 10:30 PM #50
Instead of playing Washington m/l, I just took Penix for Heisman at +1600. What is the prevailing opinion on whether that cashes if they happen to win this matchup?
-
12-01-23 10:44 PM #51
-
12-01-23 10:49 PM #52
Can't believe this is the end of the Pac 12.
RIPNomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: JAKEPEAVY21
-
12-01-23 11:04 PM #53
Isn't it obvious that DK knew Oregon would most likely lose SU to not offer cashout on any of my parlays with the Oregon ML in them? Originally Posted by DJK
What the hell is it that they knew that the most of the public didn't?
My initial inkling was to take the plus ML on Washington but couldn't pull the trigger so took Washington on the spread instead.
I won something but it could have been 3X instead.
-
12-01-23 11:09 PM #54
No Chance of Penix the Heisman. Originally Posted by teecee
None.
Bo and Jayden way ahead of him.
He lost when they barely beat ASU at home by 8 points and he threw 2 Int's and 0 TDs.
-
12-01-23 11:13 PM #55
NCAA football won't be the same, oh sure those BIG 10 games will be terrific, but still. Originally Posted by gauchojake
-
12-01-23 11:59 PM #56
uh oh Originally Posted by BobbyBazuka
-
12-02-23 07:22 AM #57
crazy and yeah good catch. Originally Posted by DJK
-
12-02-23 07:24 AM #58
as i said Washington was allowed to hold the oregon receivers. jerseys being pulled no call
that's the game because Oregon passing attack depends on timing
-
12-02-23 07:36 AM #59
Hard to argue that with Washington beating them twice, nasher. Originally Posted by stevenash
Washington came out with a purpose and were the more physical team.
Oregon looked like they were just going through the motions and didn't match the Huskies intensity.
That Rb, Dillon Johnson, had a very gutty performance while hobbling in between plays...physical runner looks like he will have a future in the NFL.
I had Oregon winning but going to root for Washington in the playoff now.
-
12-02-23 07:40 AM #60
Washington in a good thing for other playoff team
they r basically this years tcu
-
12-02-23 07:52 AM #61
Disagree, they might lose but are way better than TCU was last year...better QB, more physical in the trenches, better WRS....I can go on Originally Posted by johnnyvegas13
-
12-02-23 02:12 PM #62
Originally Posted by johnnyvegas13
better than TCU last year IMO but could be in trouble in the playoffs against some of the big boys.
-
12-02-23 02:14 PM #63
I agree they are better but not by much. Originally Posted by JAKEPEAVY21
TCU played everyone well and handled Michigan man for man at the L.O.S.
only Georgia last year pushed TCU around.
the Washington that showed up at home vs ASU and Wazzu, worries me.
-
12-02-23 02:48 PM #64
I don't really think TCU "handled" Michigan at the L.O.S. I think it was just a perfect storm of events to pull the upset. Michigan wins that game 8-9 out of 10 times. The one they played on that day happened to be one of those 1 or 2 out of 10. Originally Posted by homie1975
-
12-02-23 02:50 PM #65
Now if Alabama wins and FSU wins, we very well could see an SEC-free championship playoffs.
You can't shutout the Horns given the aforementioned scenario, nor can you shutout an undefeated FSU.
I'm assuming a Michigan win in all of this of course.
-
12-02-23 02:50 PM #66
agreed Eddy turnovers were big factor I believe Originally Posted by Eddy Munny
-
12-02-23 02:57 PM #67
watch the tape again and read what i wrote. handled them man for man. Originally Posted by Eddy Munny
in other words, they neutralized the OL v DL advantage on both sides of the L.O.S.
so UM abandoned the running game and tried some trickeration which they did not need to do against anyone else all year, not even Ohio St.
oh yeah, and UM did not have the TCU signals
-
12-02-23 02:58 PM #68
caused by TCU stopping the UM running game and forcing UM to pass and they confused JJ with stunts and blitzes. Originally Posted by Easy-Rider 66
-
12-02-23 03:15 PM #69
It was more than that, though. I don't recall the game play for play at this point but it was marred by stuff I would call flukey. Like the Quentin Johnston long touchdown that was simply a sideline route and a missed tackle but covered like 70 yards. And given all the circus plays, Michigan still had a chance at the very end. Originally Posted by homie1975
TCU deserved to win that day, but I don't think it was representative of how those teams actually were.
Reply With Quote
