 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
I didn't get up and leave. We played about 40 min total, I don't grind two hour sessions, this ain't pokerstars. Plus by the time I left you weren't playing smart, I truly did it to help you, no joke.
Stay out of casino, I have made a good amount of points have played in the casino once in two years
the casino is where dreams come true deemer
Account Figures
Item Amount Current Balance 0.00 SBR Available Balance 0.00 SBR Amount at Risk 0.00 SBR Last Week`s Win/Loss Figure 1565.48 SBR This Week`s Win/Loss Figure 1412.22 SBR Life Time Figure 24,743.00 SBR Free Play Balance 60.00 SBR Item Amount
|
|
Originally Posted by milwaukee mike
Nice job here MM, You are 1 of the few guys i have seen with a positive Balance in the Casino..Keep it going brother..
Deems, This Hockey guy is a decent player in poker, But kid has many issues......I mean you have to play poker exactly his way or he starts with negative posts..........I believe he is the same guy that hit and ran Jimmy Profett early last night( I wasnt there, But there is a thread around). Hockey's Reply was it was a 1/2 table and i only won 80-120, and thats what i was down so i ended session even..........Play how everyone plays, each guy is a bit different, thats what makes up human beings......We dont bet that same amount on games, we dont play poker alike and we sure as fuk dont all have the same table manners........... Keep grinding Deems, I enjoy playing poker with you, if its for 10 minutes or 2 hours........
Cheers pal!Deems, This Hockey guy is a decent player in poker, But kid has many issues......I mean you have to play poker exactly his way or he starts with negative posts..........I believe he is the same guy that hit and ran Jimmy Profett early last night( I wasnt there, But there is a thread around). Hockey's Reply was it was a 1/2 table and i only won 80-120, and thats what i was down so i ended session even..........Play how everyone plays, each guy is a bit different, thats what makes up human beings......We dont bet that same amount on games, we dont play poker alike and we sure as fuk dont all have the same table manners........... Keep grinding Deems, I enjoy playing poker with you, if its for 10 minutes or 2 hours........
I just keep a 4-5k points balance and when I make a decent amount, cash in some GC's... I mean if I lose a buy in, I won't be irate if someone leaves...
I get more mad if someone bad beats me then leaves, if you do it with best hand, so be it. You deserved it.
has to be from sports.
for casino, that's extremely unlikely. With 200 maximum limits in baccarat, 400 craps, to get over +24,000 at any point has a probability of less than 1 in a billion. Would need such a rediculously long streak. Extremely low probability of occuring based on variance. There is no strategy that can profit in the long term with the computer RNG based casinos. They are simply computer programs randomly designed to pay out less then they take in.
If i'm smart enough to know this, why the hell do i play the sbr casino? Because im greedy. I want to get rich quick with hit and runs when im not patient enough to play poker.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 11:15 AM.
i still got 50 bucks left in free pizza. if bruins win tonight im cashing 800 in for $45 more in pizza.
when the state's broke im living off sbr food stamps. lol
Unreal. Buncha windbags in this thread. Waiting for po69 to post an essay now.
And congrats on giving Mike a chance to share his monopoly winnings.
i disagree, there have been quite a few promos where it was hugely +ev to play in the sbr casino.has to be from sports.
for casino, that's extremely unlikely. With 200 maximum limits in baccarat, 400 craps, to get over +24,000 at any point has a probability of less than 1 in a billion. There is no (NONE!) strategy that can profit in the long term with the computer RNG based casinos. They are simply computer programs randomly designed to pay out less then they take in.
If i'm smart enough to know this, why the hell do i play the sbr casino? Because im greedy. I want quick hit and runs when im not patient enough to play poker.
they used to do 4/1 blackjack with 20 or 25 point max bets quite often
i had lifetime winnings of +50000 before losing a bunch in the sportsbook
Mike lies, tat will verify
I did not (NOT! NOT! NOT!) hit and run Jimmy Proffit. I vehemently deny this. I was down 150 in a session. I won like 80-100 of Jimmy in one hand (was losing to him and others before). I won 2 bets off him (flop and turn, he folded to river bet). I was down 150, and got a flop and a turn bet in 1/2 from jimmy (about 80-100?). I was still down 50. I left table because i wanted to cut my losses. However, I was only gone for 5min, then decided to play again and returned to the table for 5 more hours. I played 3 hours longer then Jimmy's entire future stay at the table. I was there all night until the game broke with me and Centaur, the last 2 players there all night. It is NOT a hit and run when you are LOSING MONEY. If i am LOSING 150 dollars, but get 100 of it back, i am still down 50 dollars. Other player still up 50 dollars. However, even though i did this for 5 min, i came back to table after 5min and played for 5 more hours. Jimmy had ALL NIGHT to try to win points off me. I also offered to play him at higher stakes, so he could win MORE money off me.Deems, This Hockey guy is a decent player in poker, But kid has many issues......I mean you have to play poker exactly his way or he starts with negative posts..........I believe he is the same guy that hit and ran Jimmy Profett early last night( I wasnt there, But there is a thread around). Hockey's Reply was it was a 1/2 table and i only won 80-120, and thats what i was down so i ended session even..........Play how everyone plays, each guy is a bit different, thats what makes up human beings......We dont bet that same amount on games, we dont play poker alike and we sure as fuk dont all have the same table manners........... Keep grinding Deems, I enjoy playing poker with you, if its for 10 minutes or 2 hours........
Don't anyone DARE say i hit and run. I put my entire (100%) balance on the line every game and keep it in the game all session long giving players chance to win their points back, and my entire bankroll, in every session. I will go all in on bluff with my entire balance with players when they are down money, giving them the chance to win my whole balance. I am not a hit and quit player. I put my whole bankroll on the line every game. That's why i go from 0 to 3,000 and back down to 0 every night. Then get up next day, 6 in tourney, and do it all over again.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 11:32 AM.
lies about what?
check my purchases last year, $2670 worth of gift cards + 2 ipads
since then i have borrowed 10,000 points a couple times and lost them all
oh! If a casino has a +EV game (none do because in business to make money, not go bankrupt), then yes. you can win. but all the games are -EV. If your winnings from +EV games during promos outweigh losses then yes maybe. But you can't get +24,000 with a 200 max bet in a -EV game.
true, i agree with that
but blackjack here has a max bet of 700x3
so someone could quite easily win or lose 20,000 in a session of that
No shit by the end, i wasn't playing smart. I got stacked for 2,000 and was STEAMING. You've sucked out on me to get 5,000 points the last 3 days. I'm still sick about the 10/20 NL hand with the nut straight KQ on the 9TJ board against you 1 pair (jq) and you runner runner me for a 2k pot. You stuffed all your money in 6.7% to win. Then you got bailed out everytime you overcomit yourself preflop with dogshit hands. You're a luckbox against me. Absolute luckbox. Unbelievable. Get it in with the stone cold nuts, and i still can't beat you.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 11:45 AM.
That was a rough loss. No doubt. Calling me a luck box isn't accurate.
So cool off, see ya at the tables pal
yea i could see that with a 2100 betting limit. but in all the other games with 200, 400 betting limits, getting over 25,000 has extremely low probability. I actually know the statistical stuff for this. Learned it in my college actuarial statistics class. if you have a rate (-1%), with randomness (iid normal binomial with mean, std), and you run simulations, you could see all the different directions it could take. It's like Brownian Motion. Einstein derived a lot of it. Think about mapping a particle, with all the different directions it could take (iid Bernouli). I have a Matlab statistical program that does this. You can analyze the probability of getting above a certain value (say, 20k, 50k, 100k, and if you're thinking the chance of getting above a million-it's 0). You can pick how many simulations you want it to run and paramaters of normal iid curve (binomial). Matlab has line plots that simulate randomness of independent Bernouli distributions. You can run it with 500, 1000, 10,000 however many times.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 11:51 AM.
^^einstein never derived anything, he stole every idea he ever had and every paper he ever wrote
Einstein wrote the damn proof. Just like Fisher Black and Myron Scholes have their name on the proofs and derivations for the black-scholes model for option pricing. Einstein definitely changed the face of science. Time, mass, the earth.. it's all relative. As you move in space, the universe contracts towards you, and time slows down. Everything is relative. Did some work explaining gravity, the force that attracts all objects in universe to each other. Debate in science community now. they trying to derive the one formula that can agree with both quantom mechanics and electromagnitism. String theory is out there. Einstein is definitely one of the most important thinkers in the history.
so einstein didn't steal that stuff while working in the patent office?
do some research, he was an inept moron, we have been sold a lie regarding einstein
before you say that, you should try doing some of the mathematics related to Einstein. He was a genius.
to do the work that he was doing, and to have derived the stuff that he derived, and to have thought about thinks the way he did and the way no one ever has before, he had to be an independent thinker. You can't work in a patent office and steal/plaigarize something, then transform into the smartest man of all time overnight. and his work on the atomic bomb. his work with brownian motion. He derived so much in science and mathematics. Tons of things. Libraries full of material. he had to be one the smartest man that ever lived. even if he saw shit in patent office, wouldnt have been able to make him do what he did if he was just some guy. and if his proofs were the same as another guy, he would have gotton sued. he wouldn't have transformed into smartest guy ever. He did so much and was a huge pioneer. There's no way he could have just stolen everything and been an idiot. he worked on the atomic bomb along with Feynman. Last i checked, it worked and we blew up japan and ended the war. I don't think we were able to build the bomb by einstein showing up to work everyday and saying "i don't know how this works."
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 12:08 PM.
if anyone should gamble yur pts hockey, its tatddy. guy went 7-0 yesterday in college ball. UNREAL.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanistRobert Brown in 1827.
The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the AmericanJosiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
This hockey guy is fired up, Ill tell you that.
Salud mike
yeah sorry for hijacking the thread into a discussion of einstein
we went from points discussion to poker arguing to einstein arguing
Hockey is Jacked up...................................... .....................Deems ship him 50 points for this thread would ya?
think you are wrong here mike. einstein was legit. rumours and gossip circulate about all famouse men and women of history, churchilll (supposedly racist), gandhi (supposedly a womanizer), isaac newton (supposedly gay), thomas jefferson (obsessed with black women) and so on and so forth. now this about einstein. its all bs man. i cannot say for 100% but im pretty sure 90% is bullshit spread from gossip and lies. just like sweep and his hyenas did to me on the forum
|
|
Looks like you boys are having fun
im not arguing. I just don't think anyone can doubt einstein changed modern science and mathematics in so many ways. The idea of relativity was new. Before einstein it was Newtonian physics. Einstein really changed physics when he proved that time, mass, space... its all relative. Meaning of that is crazy when you think about it. at speed of light, time is constant. As approach high velocity close to light, time slows down, and universe contracts towards you. real interesting stuff. famous scientist. rightfully so. Brought tons of new contributions to science and mathematics. i don't think you could dismiss every mathematical achievement of Einstein as simple plaigarism. He derived so many things and published so much work in the math and science community.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 02:38 PM.
mike, lay off Einstein
it's Edison you should be going after
i implore you guys to do your own research and come to your own conclusions about who was responsible for einstein's equations and theories.
it wasn't simple, it was a concerted effort to shove his genius down our throats, just like anne frank, sigmund freud, etc etc etc, the media has given these people artificial greatness through decades of hype and misinformation.
if something is shoved down your throat as fact, it is probably complete bullshit. here's a great post i have tagged from years ago about conventional wisdom.
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=70152
do you watch bob's burgers? they did a great show about edison last week, showing that he intentionally electrocuted topsy the elephant
edison was a scumbag, i'll agree with that
Einstein derived probabilistic calculations regarding the movement of a particle. all the different ways it could travel. He derived mathematical representations of it probabilistically. brownian motion is applied to finance and portfolio theory (all different ways portfolio value can move- up down up down etc. under set of iid normal RV's.
Last edited by hockey216; 03-23-13 at 02:43 PM.
Einstein did so much and was a pioneer in so many mathematical and scientific discoveries, derivations, etc. there is no way you can say he just plaigarized everything. Nobody before him knew relativity. He derived a ton of shit that nobody else knew before him. Wasn't out there. might have extended some stuff from some other peoples work in some stuff, but definitely derived and proved a whole ton of shit on his own. definitely one of most important scientists of all time.
Guy was a total thief. Nikola Tesla Day is July 10, where everyone can remember how Edison stole Tesla's inventions, got patents for them, and took credit for them.
I didn't know about Topsy the Elephant.
Reply With Quote
Footballtime gave milwaukee mike 12 SBR Point(s) for this post.
