[paco]

Every single bettor in this thread is the "public". I don't get the differentiation. Maybe someone here could define public.

Certain well known sharp bettors and syndicates wouldn't be posting on a public forum the plays they were on.

When I met justin7 at Vegas, very very nice guy but guy wouldn't even let me take a peak at his sheet while we were waiting in line to put our bets in.

[asdf21]

When I met justin7 at Vegas, very very nice guy but guy wouldn't even let me take a peak at his sheet while we were waiting in line to put our bets in.

I didn't know justin7 bet himself. How did you meet him, by chance?

[Big Bear]

he met him at the bash

[No coincidences]

Every single bettor in this thread is the "public". I don't get the differentiation. Maybe someone here could define public.

I'll tell you the same thing I told paco: just because we are the public, which we are, doesn't mean you have to bet with/like the public.

[blackeyeshamus]

I'll tell you the same thing I told paco: just because we are the public, which we are, doesn't mean you have to bet with/like the public.

Amen.

[TankHankerous]

I AM Queens Boulevard

[KRIT]

Certain well known sharp bettors and syndicates wouldn't be posting on a public forum the plays they were on.

When I met justin7 at Vegas, very very nice guy but guy wouldn't even let me take a peak at his sheet while we were waiting in line to put our bets in.

why?

[RavensFan2k3]

I'll tell you the same thing I told paco: just because we are the public, which we are, doesn't mean you have to bet with/like the public.

This!!! My God, how can people be so stupid lol. Just because someone says "the public", doesnt mean they are excluding themselves, they are just refering to where the majority of the money is. They dont mean it as if there is some "private group" that is excluded. Public doesnt mean square.

[Pauulzcappin]

public lost on blue jays, tigers and are gonna probably lose on the brewers as well

[No coincidences]

public lost on blue jays, tigers and are gonna probably lose on the brewers as well

Majority of bets were on Tampa?

[Big Bear]

Majority of bets were on Tampa?

the books keep that information a secret.

[No coincidences]

the books keep that information a secret.

You don't know anything about anything.

[Pauulzcappin]

Majority of bets were on Tampa?

nevermind... i got them mixed up. they won with toronto.

[Big Bear]

You don't know anything about anything.

relax have a beer.

[figue]

This!!! My God, how can people be so stupid lol. Just because someone says "the public", doesnt mean they are excluding themselves, they are just refering to where the majority of the money is. They dont mean it as if there is some "private group" that is excluded. Public doesnt mean square.

public is the mayority of number bets ,money?? nobody know.

[asdf21]

public = the sum of people that lose money on the long run

[paco]

public = the sum of people that lose money on the long run

Not true. I consider myself public. I have had 6 of 7 winning seasons and 4 of those were monster seasons

[asdf21]

If you manage to win 6 of 7 seasons you're sharp, not public. Unless the winnings come from some huge odds once-in-a-year parlay.

[paco]

If you manage to win 6 of 7 seasons you're sharp, not public. Unless the winnings come from some huge odds once-in-a-year parlay.

Nah, percentage even with dogs and chalk. My volume is not enough to take me out of public category and I'm ok with that. Another big false flag I hear is winning gamblers don't play parlays, which I disagree. I hit 3 4tm parlays today including playing straight��

[asdf21]

Out of interest I just calculated that if you're a losing player (meaning you hit 50% on the long run), the probability that you win at least 6 out of 7 seasons (200 picks each), assuming flat stakes and dime lines, is about 0.25%. So there's a 99.75% chance of you being sharp.

[paco]

Public buried today with kc on nationally televised game espn

[2daBank]

Nah, percentage even with dogs and chalk. My volume is not enough to take me out of public category and I'm ok with that. Another big false flag I hear is winning gamblers don't play parlays, which I disagree. I hit 3 4tm parlays today including playing straight��

i play round robins on my plays anytime i like the card, why wouldnt you get paid on days you sweep the board? not costing much on days ya only hit 3 of 5..not to mention it leaves plenty of chances to live bet the late gms and win no matter what.. makes a good spot to put the juiced up plays likely to win..