1. #1
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,662
    Betpoints: 32303

    Anyone else feeling SF with Timmah ! +115 tonight over Beckett and LADI

    I got a feeling Timmah! steps up tonight with a solid start.

    Now 90 percent of my handicapping is based on stone cold facts, but I pay attention a little to that little birdie in the back of my head too.

    I know all about the fast ball is 90 MPH now and not 95 MPH anymore.
    I know all about the nagging injuries of the past.
    I know all about the red flags surrounding Lincecum.

    Having said all that, I'm hearing Timmah ! physically pretty good right now, and even though he had a rough spring, his off speed stuff is still there.

    Right now, this isn't a play, but more of a discussion thread, and could turn into a play.

    I don't like Josh Beckett, I don't like his attitude, I think his heart isn't in this and he's just in this now for the monthly paycheck.
    I also think Josh is like 2 years + past his prime.

    I can't ignore the fact that the Dodger dugout in the past can't touch Timmy.
    Yes, I understand some of these numbers were compiled when Timmy was a little healthier, but still.

    LOS ANGELES DODGERS CAREER STATISTICS VS. TIM LINCECUM
    BATTER AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO AVG OBP SLG OPS
    Luis Cruz 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 .000
    A.J. Ellis 9 1 0 0 0 0 6 4 .111 .467 .111 .578
    Mark Ellis 15 5 1 0 0 0 3 2 .333 .444 .400 .844
    Andre Ethier 43 12 3 0 2 6 5 11 .279 .354 .488 .843
    Adrian Gonzalez 42 8 0 0 0 1 3 16 .190 .244 .190 .435
    Dee Gordon 13 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 .077 .143 .077 .220
    Jerry Hairston Jr. 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 .500 .600 .500 1.100
    Elian Herrera 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000
    Matt Kemp 42 9 1 0 0 3 4 18 .214 .292 .238 .530
    Hanley Ramirez 14 3 1 0 1 3 0 5 .214 .214 .500 .714
    Skip Schumaker 22 7 1 0 1 2 1 5 .318 .348 .500 .848
    Justin Sellers 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .000 .143 .000 .143
    Juan Uribe 13 3 1 0 0 2 0 5 .231 .333 .308 .641
    Totals 227 51 8 0 4 17 24 73 .225 .309 .313 .621

  2. #2
    freeVICK
    freeVICK's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-21-08
    Posts: 7,114
    Betpoints: 6501

    SF pen will always keep them in games

  3. #3
    rcene
    rcene's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-28-12
    Posts: 3,036

    I am going to watch how he throws.

    Can't put any money on him until he proves that his spring was just a hiccup

  4. #4
    InTheDrink
    Drinker of the Year
    InTheDrink's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-09
    Posts: 23,983
    Betpoints: 527

    Quote Originally Posted by rcene View Post
    I am going to watch how he throws.

    Can't put any money on him until he proves that his spring was just a hiccup
    so was all of last year a hiccup?

    if you take lincecum you might as well take the over

  5. #5
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Game is unbettable in my book.

    Have no idea if Beckett is going to be interested in pitching well -- probably depends on if he got his mid-afternoon nap and bottle.

    I'm not interested in backing Lincecum in any way, shape or form either. Number would have to be +130 or so for my ears to perk up.

  6. #6
    EXhoosier10
    EXhoosier10's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-06-09
    Posts: 3,122
    Betpoints: 4390

    Quote Originally Posted by rcene View Post
    I am going to watch how he throws.

    Can't put any money on him until he proves that his spring was just a hiccup
    Seconded. Any bet made on this game that involves Lincecum is -EV as nobody has any clue how he'll pitch

  7. #7
    rcene
    rcene's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-28-12
    Posts: 3,036

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheDrink View Post
    so was all of last year a hiccup?

    if you take lincecum you might as well take the over
    Last year was a bad sign that something was wrong.

    Good pitchers do not just turn to crap over night like that.

    So it was the same this spring, all I am saying is that I will not bet on him until he proves that he can miss a few bats.

    Keep the ball in the park if you will

  8. #8
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Lincecum starts REALLY slowly every year

  9. #9
    InTheDrink
    Drinker of the Year
    InTheDrink's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-09
    Posts: 23,983
    Betpoints: 527

    Quote Originally Posted by rcene View Post
    Last year was a bad sign that something was wrong.

    Good pitchers do not just turn to crap over night like that.

    So it was the same this spring, all I am saying is that I will not bet on him until he proves that he can miss a few bats.

    Keep the ball in the park if you will
    yeah my only point was that spring was more of the same from last year

    he could be doing mop up duty by may

  10. #10
    YankThunder06
    YankThunder06's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-01-13
    Posts: 75

    No but I like this play!

  11. #11
    InTheDrink
    Drinker of the Year
    InTheDrink's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-23-09
    Posts: 23,983
    Betpoints: 527

    and i will say that im not necessarily questioning the play because beckett fukkin blows too

    but with an over of 7 with these shitbags id be all over that

  12. #12
    YankThunder06
    YankThunder06's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-01-13
    Posts: 75

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheDrink View Post
    and i will say that im not necessarily questioning the play because beckett fukkin blows too

    but with an over of 7 with these shitbags id be all over that

    Sounds like straight cash!

  13. #13
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    To me, it's a question of which starter is the bigger fade. In that equation, beckett is the bigger fade. Doesn't mean I'm going to back lince. Just a lean on SF for me because bosch will better handle his bull pen than mattingly (IMO).

  14. #14
    rcene
    rcene's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-28-12
    Posts: 3,036

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheDrink View Post
    yeah my only point was that spring was more of the same from last year

    he could be doing mop up duty by may
    His era goes from consistently in the mid 2s, to double that last year.

    Home run derby everytime he pitched.

    So I am with you, next month he may be the long man out of the pen

  15. #15
    Hench
    Hench's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-14-12
    Posts: 304
    Betpoints: 1044

    Took the over 6.5 when the lines first came out without too much thought.

  16. #16
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,662
    Betpoints: 32303

    Quote Originally Posted by Hench View Post
    Took the over 6.5 when the lines first came out without too much thought.
    That's the right thinking.

    I think SF takes this game, can't pull the trigger on Timmah ! though, but thought it would make a nice little dinner time discussion thread.

    No bets for me this evening, can't find anything worth putting cash money on.
    I like Harvey and the Mets, but the price is to high

  17. #17
    jnickell100
    jnickell100's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-11-09
    Posts: 4,305
    Betpoints: 269

    Quote Originally Posted by EVPlus View Post
    To me, it's a question of which starter is the bigger fade. In that equation, beckett is the bigger fade. Doesn't mean I'm going to back lince. Just a lean on SF for me because bosch will better handle his bull pen than mattingly (IMO).
    How is Beckett more of a fade? What was his ERA last year with the dodgers??

  18. #18
    Deuce
    Eddie Mush
    Deuce's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-12-08
    Posts: 29,843
    Betpoints: 3519

    Cumboy will be sporting a 30 ERA and be the highest paid bat boy by the end of May.

  19. #19
    HOT WINGS
    HOT WINGS's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-29-10
    Posts: 8,055
    Betpoints: 3651

    Quote Originally Posted by Hench View Post
    Took the over 6.5 when the lines first came out without too much thought.
    I did the same thing. Think both pitchers get hit around a little bit. Timmay needs that fastball and doesn't have it and Beckett won't make it through more than 5 imo

  20. #20
    Bostongambler
    Bostongambler's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 02-01-08
    Posts: 35,931
    Betpoints: 14392

    I like them here as well Steve

  21. #21
    tatddy
    tatddy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-02-10
    Posts: 10,779
    Betpoints: 608

    If there is this much vacillating it prob means there were/are better spots today.

  22. #22
    pulledclear
    pulledclear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-12
    Posts: 6,684

    Lincecum is gonna get shelled.

  23. #23
    BigD46
    BigD46's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-25-12
    Posts: 123
    Betpoints: 644

    If I win my Nats runline bet, I might back Timmy. I hope he proves all of you haters wrong!

  24. #24
    Killer_Demo
    209 Street-Tough
    Killer_Demo's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-15-08
    Posts: 8,409
    Betpoints: 4201

    On Stoner Timmy too

  25. #25
    EVPlus
    EVPlus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-07-12
    Posts: 1,111
    Betpoints: 451

    Quote Originally Posted by jnickell100 View Post
    How is Beckett more of a fade? What was his ERA last year with the dodgers??
    I'm factoring in how he performed for Boston before he became a Dodger. And it's not just stats. Sure, sure, stats are important. But it's his overall "I don't give a fukk" attitude towards his job and the game I also factor in. Btw, in case you're not watching, it's SF 5, LA 3 at the time of this post. Like I said earlier, bosch will handle the bull pen better and beckett is the bigger fade in my eyes.

  26. #26
    Colin Kaepernick
    Colin Kaepernick's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-06-13
    Posts: 382



    + Money on the best team in MLB is never a bad thing

    (almost never)

Top