[armin]

bet the first half under 0.5 at 2.00 or higher

bet the over at HIGHER than 2.00, for example 2.50.

if there is a goal, you win. if there is no goal, you get the money back.


??? am i missing something ?

[Fl6j66]

I think you are missing real life odds.

[PuckIt]

I think you are missing real life odds.

Right...

[armin]

live betting obiously

[Fl6j66]

So you bet under 0.5 at 2.5 and wait 30 minutes until over 0.5 hits 2.3? You are missing absolutely nothing.

[Vaughany]

lol

[armin]

So you bet under 0.5 at 2.5 and wait 30 minutes until over 0.5 hits 2.3? You are missing absolutely nothing.

no

ill take the cambuur leeuwaren - groningen game for example.

live in play

at minute 21 the 0.5 under was 2.00.

at minute 26 the over 0,5 was 2.25.

so you bet them both. the only problem is there shoudnt be a goal between minute 21 and 25. i dont know what the probability of that is ???

edit nvm probably the same as betting under in minute 85 or something.

retarded thread is retarded.

[onemoregoal]

lol. the odds reflect the fact that if a goal is scored between 21 and 26 you lose. if theres no goal between 21-26 then yes you are entitled to that win, but its a bet...
You are betting no goals between 21-26........

[turtlejc]

??? am i missing something ?

Only thing you'll be missing is a lot of money

[armin]

Only thing you'll be missing is a lot of money

....

[Fl6j66]

cambuur leeuwaren - groningen game for example.

live in play

at minute 21 the 0.5 under was 2.00.

at minute 26 the over 0,5 was 2.25.

first goal scored in 2nd minute

there shoudnt be a goal between minute 21 and

goal scored in 21st minute lol (sorry)

http://www.flashscore.com/match/hdnyyCU7/#match-summary

[armin]

first goal scored in 2nd minute


goal scored in 21st minute lol

http://www.flashscore.com/match/hdnyyCU7/#match-summary

yea sorry ment the under 1.5

right after the goal

but it doesnt matter anyway. odds are to low for the risk