It is SDQL:
Pats lost 33-20 to the Dolphins week one, Belichick trying to avenge an earlier same season defeat against a division opponent? SDQL trend points (clearly) to the PATS with an ATS record of 11-1 and cover margin of 9.67 points per game.
team=Patriots and PIV and P:season=season and P:L and season>=2000
ATS 11-1 (9.67)
With the first loss on the road and the PATS failing to cover and now are at home:
team=Patriots and PIV and P:season=season and P:AL and P:ATSL and H and season>=2000
ATS 7-0 (13.21)
SUP 6-1 (17.86)
Denver breathing down their neck for homefield should we not expect, to a degree that is far greater than we usually expect something, a solid effort from the Patriots?
Any thoughts on this game?
(Vitriol towards me for posting in the NBA thread also welcome, this thread more active than that other one and I wanted to impress as large an audience as possible with my ability to speak SDQL. Despite that being an illusion lol, and in actuality: an ability to copy&paste.)
I wondered ya'llz opinions considering the homefield earning facet + small sample size how strong an SDQL reading you'd call this, so I can store that in my brain re; sdql where this involves small sample size generally & also mainly in regards to NFL overall & lastly DIV matchups, specific scenarios.
In plain English: are there situations wherein small sample size is acceptable or further even totally not considered a "red flag"?....NE on revenge then further the 2nd thing "First loss on Road, Pats fail to cover & now at home...ATS 7-0 (13.21) SUP 6-1 (17.86) a good sized sample really. success of PATS since year 2000 taken into consideration....yes?
I'm fascinated by the concept of SDQL and if I hadn't been given a brain this time around thats allergic to numbers I'd be all up in it, totally. That may be why I'm fascinated by it cuz I presently suspect it as a way for numerically challenged such as me to USE numbers while still maintaining a very healthy distance from them lol.
May be that or not. eventually I'll know for sure but THOUGHTS ON THIS GAME AND THE PERTAINING SDQL posted???? please. i.e "just too tiny a sample size to have real value? SQDL + NFL, due to not enough data + the HUGE CHANGES TO THE GAME OF late, increase in PI calls, ruffing NFL actively seeking to create more offense, more exciting games thus more viewers + protect players"???
Has the evolution of the NFL rendered SQDL for NFL not worth pursuing?
Altogether or just greener pastures re: sdql lie in NBA, NHL and.....elsewhere? lastly where (in what sports) do we see the best success? And the least?