[Wallco99]

Wallco,
Have you ever checked your selections on a straight win game to see how they wouldv'e gone?

No I haven't, and you put your apostrophe in the wrong place.

[cmendo2005]

No nhl picks to follow? I don't even know what to do today now...

[Wallco99]

No nhl picks to follow? I don't even know what to do today now...

There is only one game today. Enjoy the break, there are six plays for tomorrow.

[I/O]

I tried that last year and got reprimanded by a whiny bitch moderator because some poor soul was offended that there were NBA plays in the NHL forum.

1. whiny bitch
a woman who thinks you want to hear about her boyfriend trouble, car trouble, work trouble, etc.

2. whiny bitchwhat a sensetive guy becomes if you dont talk to him and it makes him cry

3. Whiny Bitch
One who complains, moans, bitches, or is an all around annoying dramatic pussy.

[Wallco99]

1. whiny bitch
a woman who thinks you want to hear about her boyfriend trouble, car trouble, work trouble, etc.

2. whiny bitchwhat a sensetive guy becomes if you dont talk to him and it makes him cry

3. Whiny Bitch
One who complains, moans, bitches, or is an all around annoying dramatic pussy.

4. Whiny bitch one who complains and hands out infractions for posting NBA plays in an NHL thread while ignoring her real job of annoying her husband/boyfriend.

[Grinder12000]

wow - I drove 620 miles today and there was noway to get the NHL picks in or even see what they were. NO GAMES WHOO HOO.

400 miles tomorrow.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 65-1 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +52.19 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-5.17 units)


v1 Fades
(A) 40-10
(B) 8-1
(C) 1-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 9-9
(B) 3-5
(C) 4-1
Losses: DET (-12.81 u)



Games for (11/27/13):
#65 Montreal @ Buffalo (+1½) v2 (B) (7:05 pm EST)
#67 St Louis @ Colorado (+1½) v1 (B) (9:05 pm EST)
#69 Montreal @ Buffalo (+1½) v1 (A) (7:05 pm EST)
#70 St. Louis (M/L) @ Colorado v1 (A) (9:05 pm EST)
#71 Chicago @ Calgary (+1½) v1 (A) (10:05 pm EST)
#72 Phoenix (+1½) @ Minnesota v2 (A) (8:05 pm EST)


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.

[bonhammer]

Wallco,
if the St. Louis vs. Colorado games lands -110, how do you play it?

[Wallco99]

Wallco,
if the St. Louis vs. Colorado games lands -110, how do you play it?

We will skip the 1 unit (A) bet, and deduct 1 unit from the (B) bet. We would then play the loser on the next game at the amount we would have played them for anyway had we not skipped the A bet, less the extra juice money from that one unit.

Say we skipped the (A) bet and deducted one unit from (B) as mentioned. If St. Louis was to lose the bet, we would still play them on their (B) bet as normal, and we would play them for 2 units like we normally would. The diiference is since their was no (A) bet, their would be no extra juice added to the (B) bet, that is why it is only 2 units. If that bet wins, and since their was no (A) bet, we would win 2 units for that bet instead of the normal 1 unit (one unit for that series, and one unit for the series we skipped that won the previous bet).

We win the same amount of money by skipping those bets that BOTH sides can't win because both sides are M/L plays. What we also do is save juice money on the losing sides for the amount of units skipped which would only really hurt us anyway if the series was to lose.

However, always play all bets when one team is M/L and other team is +1 1/2, this skip technique only applies to the -110/-110 and -105/-105 games when we have a play on both sides.

[spankmythighs]

Hey Wallco where can I follow your NBA system? Thx dude

[Wallco99]

Hey Wallco where can I follow your NBA system? Thx dude

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/nba-basket...ba-thread.html

I am currently rebacktesting it to try and add more plays and make the existing system even more efficient. Wallco NBA Chase 110.

[vancapper]

Wallco,

Thanks for your precious time spent on writing this up. I started sports betting and have been following your system for a few days. I'll be getting in now, hopefully it's not too late. All the best!

One question I have is, for your system #65, I had that previous (A) bet at -275. I am betting $10/unit, so I would have to win #65 for 27.5 + 10, correct? Plus, another win for $10 for system #69 even though it's the same game.

[rjo5027]

figured out my mistakes

[Wallco99]

Wallco,

Thanks for your precious time spent on writing this up. I started sports betting and have been following your system for a few days. I'll be getting in now, hopefully it's not too late. All the best!

One question I have is, for your system #65, I had that previous (A) bet at -275. I am betting $10/unit, so I would have to win #65 for 27.5 + 10, correct? Plus, another win for $10 for system #69 even though it's the same game.

Correct. $47.50 on Buffalo +1 1/2 for WIN not RISK total for the two series.

[cmendo2005]

Lotta play not bad

[KC Needs Hockey]

i will finish this Buffalo chase after this next game against the Leafs which I dont see how in the world Buff doesn't lose by one but after that I will not start a chase with them. They are god awful and watched the game tonight it was bad. They are 5-20-1 and 7 of their last 9 games have been losses of 2 goals or more just pathetic.

[jonny2k4]

i will finish this Buffalo chase after this next game against the Leafs which I dont see how in the world Buff doesn't lose by one but after that I will not start a chase with them. They are god awful and watched the game tonight it was bad. They are 5-20-1 and 7 of their last 9 games have been losses of 2 goals or more just pathetic.

I agree man, they are truly sickening! I will also finish the chase, are they really going to lose six straight by two goals? If they do I will not chase any of their games the rest of the way. Maybe Patty Lafontaine can lace'em up for just this one game to provide a spark!

[bgilic]

Damn it Colorado. I am really seeing the high risk stakes of this system.

Series #67. With St Louis chase in game A we risked 2.2 units and lost then in game B we had to risk 9.3 units to win 3.2 units and lost.

So now we are left with game C and we have to win 9.3+2.2+1=12.5 units which will require roughly around 25 units bet. This might leave us with 37.2 units of loss if we lose game C. Talk about risky but like I said I will stick with this for the season.

[bonhammer]

Damn it Colorado. I am really seeing the high risk stakes of this system.

Series #67. With St Louis chase in game A we risked 2.2 units and lost then in game B we had to risk 9.3 units to win 3.2 units and lost.

So now we are left with game C and we have to win 9.3+2.2+1=12.2 units which will require roughly around 25 units bet. This might leave us with 37.2 units of loss if we lose game C. Talk about risky but like I said I will stick with this for the season.

It will prob be a ML bet. If its on the PL it will be much larger then 25 units

[bgilic]

St Louis @ San Jose could very well be ML bet, in that case we are looking around 16-17 units bet and if it is PL you are right it could easily reach close to 30 units. Considering that I am just starting this system it could really hurt the bankroll but that is the risk we all take.

At least I avoided game B on Buffalo today since I just recently started the system

[KennyM10]

So you guys have finally been with wallco for a few months and the wagers are beyond high risk, hey it could be worse go check his nba thread he lost two d bets tonight, imagine how much he would be down if the wagers were real.

[KC Needs Hockey]

So you guys have finally been with wallco for a few months and the wagers are beyond high risk, hey it could be worse go check his nba thread he lost two d bets tonight, imagine how much he would be down if the wagers were real.

You remind me of......


Just bringing everyone down.

[ghislaine]

I have actually just flat bet them, individually and 1 unit per bet they are money

So you guys have finally been with wallco for a few months and the wagers are beyond high risk, hey it could be worse go check his nba thread he lost two d bets tonight, imagine how much he would be down if the wagers were real.

[dlinx90]

So you guys have finally been with wallco for a few months and the wagers are beyond high risk, hey it could be worse go check his nba thread he lost two d bets tonight, imagine how much he would be down if the wagers were real.

I do agree that there is a high risk involved if you look short term, series to series, but this system has proven that it is profitable long term. That said you will need to bet with an unfluctuating bet size as Wallco explained in the NBA thread. Sure you might have to deposit some more funds in your betting account if you take a few heavy losses but you will make money long term. Alternatively you could bet with 0.5 units which means if the system takes a -100 unit loss during a losing streak you won't be whiped out and you can use the 50 units you would have remaining to fund your comeback.

As for your comment about his wagers not being real I am sure they are and if he isn't betting with real money he is missing out.

While this system has it's risks I highly doubt you can show anyone a better proven and winning system.

[SuperHappyTime]

As for your comment about his wagers not being real I am sure they are and if he isn't betting with real money he is missing out.

I can't speak for Wallco, but if I had a system that didn't make money over a long term, I wouldn't be online every day updating a thread I wasn't participating in.

And if I can still jump on the KennyM10 pileup, I'll cite rule #1 of betting: There is not a single thing forcing you to place a single bet. Personally, I don't bet on v2 until the C bet, and even then its just for a single unit.

[Wallco99]

****

[Wallco99]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 68-1 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +55.19 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-23.34 units)

(11/27/13)
#65 Buffalo (+1½) v2 (B) - Loss
#67 Colorado (+1½) v1 (B) - Loss
#69 Buffalo (+1½) v1 (A) - Loss
#70 St. Louis (M/L) v1 (A) - Win
#71 Calgary (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
#72 Phoenix (+1½) v2 (A) - Win

v1 Fades
(A) 42-11
(B) 8-2
(C) 1-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 10-9
(B) 3-6
(C) 4-1
Losses: DET (-12.81 u)



There are no system plays for (11/28/13):
#65 Resumes v2 (C) on 11/29/13
#67 Resumes v1 (C) on 11/29/13
#69 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/29/13


Happy Thanksgiving to Everyone


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.

[analyzer]

Thanks Wallco! Happy Thanksgiving!

[Wallco99]

I can't speak for Wallco, but if I had a system that didn't make money over a long term, I wouldn't be online every day updating a thread I wasn't participating in.

And if I can still jump on the KennyM10 pileup, I'll cite rule #1 of betting: There is not a single thing forcing you to place a single bet. Personally, I don't bet on v2 until the C bet, and even then its just for a single unit.

She is just a troll looking for attention and all you are doing is giving it to her. Why would I waste my time if I wasn't playing? That's what trolls do, sit in the shadows for two months waiting for one loss, then come out of hiding to act smart and truly display the pussies that they are, while totally ignoring proven system records, and fabricating there own false data, and focusing on the price of one loss like that really matters at all when the system has so many plays in a season. The problem with KellyM10 is she never had a winning season in her life, and it kills her to see others profit on systems she didn't think of. I don't know why you let her bother you, I was done with her nonsense years ago. And to answer your question, yes, I do play both of my systems as well as JM NBA unfiltered and a small NFL system that I devised. She brings this up every year, and every year I post my bet slips. Look at earlier posts in this thread from last year if you want to see for yourself, but honestly, I don't give a shit what people think and I will continue to post plays every day. The SheTroll comes in here every year when the system takes a loss or falls into the negative for a short time, and the funny thing is, it always ended up plus units in the end. Don't worry, she has nothing better to do but bother you. Check out her posts. I challenge you to find one that is not trolling in someone's thread. With that track record, how can you even consider taking her posts seriously. Have a great holiday.

[KennyM10]

How many of you are seriously wagering over 100 units to win a couple on all these upcoming b and c bets? My guess would be none, also he listed two d bets in his nba thread that lost lsdt night and is -30 units there. For fantasy or practice this would still flush you down the drain. Seriously some of you are wagering 25 to 100 units on games. I guess no limits in fantasy bets or books.

[jonny2k4]

Happy Thanks Giving Wallco and followers

[miss_sbets]

There are no system plays for (11/28/13):
#65 Resumes v2 (B) on 11/29/13
#67 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/29/13
#69 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/29/13

Did I read this right? Isn't #65 going to be a (C) bet on 11/29?

[Wallco99]

There are no system plays for (11/28/13):
#65 Resumes v2 (B) on 11/29/13
#67 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/29/13
#69 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/29/13

Did I read this right? Isn't #65 going to be a (C) bet on 11/29?

Yes

[Greg29]

#67 is also a C bet on 11/29

[Wallco99]

#67 is also a C bet on 11/29

Yes.