1. #1
    bearmz
    bearmz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-17-07
    Posts: 320

    wk 3 notes

    GT @ MiF: GT 4-0 both L4 in ser., 2 as fav
    Boise @ Fres: Boise 7-1 both L8 in ser. with avg W by 27' L6 W's. Closest by 13. Fav 9-0 ATS. Fresno's only cover was as a Fav.
    OSU @ Tol: Last play in '98: OSU 49-0. Sandwich game? USC LW, Ill next
    UNI @ PU: No play. UNI 3-0 ATS L3 as DDRD, Wis+16', Mn+10, and Tn+16'. pU has ND NW.
    BSU @ Army: '99 Army 41-21(-9'). Army 3-1 L4 as F -1 to -6
    BC @ Clem: Dg 4-0 ATS L4 in ser. BC 3-1 SU L4 {'08 Clem 27-21(+2')}.
    Temp @ PSU: PSU 6-1 ATS L7 in ser as F -25' to -34. Onle L as -25. Has Iowa NW. PSU has really played poorly both 2H TY.
    Cal @ MN: '06 Cal 42-17(-8'). Cal 6-1 ATS as F>8'. at Ore NW. Mn 2-0 ATS L2 when +12 and 13'.
    EM @ Mich: '07 Mich 33-22(-28), '05 UM 55-0(-29') '98 UM 59-20(-34')
    LOO @ KY: '08 KY 27-2(+3'), '07 Ky 40-34(+4'). Loo 0-3 ATS L3 rd g losing 1 SU as F. Ky 1-5 ATS L6 as HF.
    NTX @ Ala: Ala @ ARK NW
    VA @ SMiss: NP. USM @ Kan NW
    UT @ Ore: '03 UT 17-13(+3') @ Ore. Ore vs Cal NW
    USC @ W: '08 USC 56-0(-45'). USC 0-4 ATS L4 rd. 0-2 ATS L2 @ Wash. Udub covered L3 when +18', 19', and 30'.
    MSU @ ND: Vis 7-1 SU L8 in ser. '08 MSU 23-7(-8'). MSU 7-3 both L10 in ser. MSU won SU L2 times as dog +10 vs ND.
    MTnSt @ MD: '08 MTS 24-14(+13), but 1-4 ATS L5 as RdD.
    UAB @ Troy: '06 UAB 21-3(-6), '05 27-7(-7').
    IU @ Akron: '07 IU 41-24(-13'). IU 1-3 ATS L4 as RdD. W was at +35'. IU avg 8' pts/g L4 on rd. Akron avg 35.5 pt/g at H L5.
    Aub @ VT: '08 VT 35-30(+7). VT 24-11 ATS as F 3' to 10. Neb 1-5 ATS as RdD 3' to 10.
    Tulsa @ Okl: '07 Okl 62-21(-23), '05 31-15(-31), '02 37-0(-37), and '01 58-0(-41). Okl off NW
    TN @ Fla: '08 Fla 30-6, '07 59-20, and '06 21-20. Fla avg pts of 27.6 L10 g in ser. 59 was only score above 32 in ser.
    WYO @ Col: NP since '97. Col 2-8 SU L10g, 1-7 ATS L8 as HF 3' to 10, and 0-2 L2 g as F. WYO 0-4 ATS L4 as D + 3' to 10.
    AZ @ IA: NP since '98. Ia @ PSU NW. Az 1st of 3 str rd g.
    SDSt @ Ida: SDST avg 10 pt/g L5 Rd. Ida avg 17 pt/g L4 Home
    Nev @ CSU: '08 Nev 28-10(-3'). Proir CSU was 9-0 SU in ser.
    Conn @ Bay: '08 Conn 31-28(-13). Bay 2-0 ATS L2 as F(-8, -4), 6-0 ATS L6 and 8-2 ATS L10.
    FlInt @Rut: NP. Rut @ MD NW
    Nav @ Pitt:'08 Pitt 42-21(-3) '07 Nav 48-45(+4)
    Cin @ OreSt: '07 Cin 34-3(+3). Cin 4-0 SU L4 rd g.
    LaLa @ LSU: '06 LSU 45-3(-29'), '02 48-0(-27'). LSU 1-8 ATS(6 as F) L9 g. 1 W was a D +4.
    IaSt @ KentSt: '08 ISU 48-28(-7'). '07 KSU 23-14(+3'). KSU allowed 34 Pt/g L4 H. ISU all. 40.75 pt/g L4 on rd.
    FSU @ BYU: BYU, including bowl, has played L7 of 9 on rd. Had all. 11.1 pt/g @ H '08 with 35 to UNLV(6.4 pt/g w/o UNLV score). FSU all 23 pt/g in 4 rd g '08.
    MiO @ WM: MiO 4-1-1 ATS L6 in ser, but 0-4 ATS L4 g.
    FlAtl @ SCar: '06 USC 45-6(-28'). Outside of scoring only 28 vs LaLa in '07, USC has manhandled Sun Belt last 4. USC has UMiss NW.
    BG @ Marsh: '04 BG 56-35(-9). Is 4-0-1 ATS L5 in ser. BG 5-0 ATS L5 rd g, 3 as F -1 to -2'. BG avg 27.2 pt/g L5 rd g and all 17.8 pt/g. Marsh all. 36.6 pt/g L5g.
    UtSt @ TAM: NP. USU all 40.6 pt/g L5 on rd while scoring 18.6. TAM avg 28.1 pt/g @ H L6 vs much tougher opps.
    MsSt @ Van: '08 MSU 17-14(+1), '04 Van 31-13(-11'). H 6-1 ATS L7 in ser since '88. Van all 20' pt/g '08 with 42 to Fla. MSU scored 9.6 pt/g on rd and all 34 in '08.
    Rice @ OkST: NP. Rice all 44.6 pt/g on rd. OSU vs weak opps in '08 all 11.5 @ H. held Geo to 10 W1.
    NW @ Syr: '08 NW 30-10(-12') has Mn NW. Syr has been outgained by an avg 155.8 yd/g L6 vs basically Top 30 teams.
    AF @ NMex: H 7-1 SU L8 in ser. AF 6-1 ATS L7 in ser. NMX 2-1 ATS since '99 when D>10 in ser. L 24-7 @ AF +14.
    Buff @ UCF: Buff 3-0 ATS in '08 when D +1' to 4'.
    Geo @ ARK: A WTF ope line at Ark+1 to P. Geo 8-1 SU L9 in ser. Last Ark W in '93 20-10. Geo 3-1 SU L 4 rd g. Found out in the past when a line is so , hard to buck it.
    WV @ Aub: '08 WV 34-17(-3)
    TT @ TX: '08 TT 39-33(+3'). Prior, Tx 8-1 SU. L3 in ser @ Tx, Tx 59-43,52-17, and 43-40. If given +16', TT would be 5-2 ATS L7 in ser.
    UTEP @ NMxSt: H 8-2 SU L10 in ser., 2-2 SU L4 each winning 1 @ H
    SJSt @ Stan: Stan 6-1 both L7 in ser. Avg W by 24.8. Only L was '06 34-35(-10')
    LaMon @ AZSt: NP. ULM 6-1 ATS L7 g. ASU @ Geo NW
    Haw @ UNLV: '08 Haw 49-14 @ UNLV. F 4-0 both L4 in ser. since '95. Haw 4-0 ATS L4 as D.

    Last edited by bearmz; 09-14-09 at 03:54 PM.

  2. #2
    pags11
    pags11's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-05
    Posts: 12,264

    love this stuff...thanks bearmz...

  3. #3
    bearmz
    bearmz's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-17-07
    Posts: 320

    From you, that's an honor, sir. Hope it helps somewhat, as it's just a bit of the whole. I try to keep it as recent as possible as I believe HC trends are more relevent than 30 yr team trends. Afterall, they recruit the roster and Ok the playbooks.

  4. #4
    pags11
    pags11's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-18-05
    Posts: 12,264


Top