Originally Posted by
Luca Fury
DeFacto is a career troll here. He doesn't mean anything he says and doesn't deny being a troll even if you accuse him of being such. He, and the rest of us, fully acknowledge that he's just dude who is bored and comes on here ball-bust in the name of a good time. However, you're the only one in this entire thread who actually thinks he's serious, and has replied to his posts as if he actually means what he's saying, or cares about what people on a forum think.
Pal, I mean exactly what you say what I say when I call you a liar and a fraud. The legal word for what you are doing is called "misrepresentation". The following definition is from the law dictionary.
An assertion or manifestation by words or conduct that is not in accord with the facts
Misrepresentation is a tort, or a civil wrong. This means that a misrepresentation can create civil liability if it results in a pecuniary loss. For example, assume that a real estate speculator owns swampland but advertises it as valuable commercially zoned land. This is a misrepresentation. If someone buys the land relying on the speculator's statement that it is commercially valuable, the buyer may sue the speculator for monetary losses resulting from the purchase.
A misrepresentation need not be intentionally false to create liability. A statement made with conscious ignorance or a reckless disregard for the truth can create liability.
To explain things to the two morons who don't know whats going on here, Luca Fury is "misrepresenting" himself in order to sell "advice" on his website (proven) and to attract listeners to his podcast which collects advertising revenue. (funnily enough from the same books his advice is supposed to help you beat).
He misrepresents himself by claiming to be a "pro MMA gambler" on his twitter and on sbr. This has already proven to have been false. After a cursory examination of the facts he openly admitted himself that the majority of his revenue does not come from MMA and he could not earn a living from MMA alone. Even if his "revenue" is real or imaginary.
So now we have a guy who now has to change his story and claim that he beats "all sports" for a profit in order to make enough to earn a living. But yet there is absolutely no documentation of this. Plus, there is no real reason to actually believe that he has the ability to do so. His claim of earning a living from "gambling" would seem HIGHLY dubious on its own, but when you couple it with his past, and his current station in life, and the fact he is trying to sell you something or otherwise earn revenue from you, it almost seems blatant doesn't it?
When you make a claim that is related to your for profit business it has to have some base in "reality" or else it is merely a misrepresentation.