[bobbywaves]

its been up for 30 mins.

shock that you instantly check the post. Stalker. jesus you cant get enough of this place and drama

Over 12 hours, not 1 reply.

Checking a loan thread, not stalking obviously. Did I blow up this loan thread by posting in it?

You chose to "stalk" by engaging me in post #313 of this thread, I simply replied.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Over 12 hours, not 1 reply.

Checking a loan thread, not stalking obviously. Did I blow up this loan thread by posting in it?

You chose to "stalk" by engaging me in post #313 of this thread, I simply replied.

Mitchell's loan request has no response in 12 hours? Wow...I guess it could be worse though; after all, in 3 months this thread has seen no interest from anyone else wanting to bet on you, despite your lead and you being a self-proclaimed "lock".

Glass houses bobbo, glass houses

[bobbywaves]

It is worse, approx 24 hours & not one response for poor Mitch.

Why would I care about forum ignorance by not betting? The only thing that matters is my huge lead & profiting 29k from you.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Why would I care about forum ignorance by not betting?

Just trying to help here, bobby: in your above sentence, you misspelled the word after "forum" pretty badly ... the proper spelling is --- P...E...R...S...P...I...C...A...C...I...T...Y

No need to thank me. You're welcome.

The only thing that matters is my huge lead & profiting 29k from you.

In actuality, the only thing that truly matters is who has more LB pts between you & Trip next Jan 1st... not June 29th.

Again, happy to factually clarify.

[Mitchell88]

It is worse, approx 24 hours & not one response for poor Mitch.

Why would I care about forum ignorance by not betting? The only thing that matters is my huge lead & profiting 29k from you.

I really hope that you don't think that it bothers me. I don't live here like you. This is not my life. This is fun place to talk to people that have integrity. biteme, DS, TDB, broadway, Zachary, and many more. I will not cry, whine, bitch or make it my life. I like to have fun when I have the time and that whats this is to me. I am not trying to buy a Segway because the scooter store ran out of double wide seats. the reason you cant get yours. boobsy If this is what gets your whistle wet then all the power to you. It's easy to tell who is here for some good chat, poker, gambling and talking to people that have you have things in common with. If no one gives me the loan I will certainly not be upset. It is what it is. I like to chat here and play poker in free time, I don't and will never make this place my life. You have already done so. I feel sorry for your mother.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8lRjXf2IK0

[Triple_D_Bet]

It is worse, approx 24 hours & not one response for poor Mitch.

Why would I care about forum ignorance by not betting? The only thing that matters is my huge lead & profiting 29k from you.

Biter's wisdom aside, if everyone else is on the opposite side of a lock, it probably isn't one

Again, giving mitch grief for no response in a day makes no sense in a thread like this one

[bobbywaves]

Biter's wisdom aside, if everyone else is on the opposite side of a lock, it probably isn't one

Again, giving mitch grief for no response in a day makes no sense in a thread like this one

Gummo & Beerdog is everyone else? How come nobody else bet on you?

Makes complete sense, unlike post #313: Mitch couldn't get a smaller loan few weeks back, yet he wants a bigger loan now.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Gummo & Beerdog is everyone else? How come nobody else bet on you?

Makes complete sense, unlike post #313: Mitch couldn't get a smaller loan few weeks back, yet he wants a bigger loan now.

Oops, sorry...I forgot a sample sizes of 2 isn't conclusive (unless you're talking about how many years you were the best poker player for beating people who weren't trying)


Regardless, it's clear that not a single other person here is willing to put any points on your "lock"...which is a pretty good sign it's not one

[bobbywaves]

Monthly update: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

As the convenient link shows, Waves has 12,350.

I have TDB at 10,840 unofficially. Perhaps he will confirm or deny, at his earliest convenience.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Monthly update: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

As the convenient link shows, Waves has 12,350.

I have TDB at 10,840 unofficially. Perhaps he will confirm or deny, at his earliest convenience.

Correct. Wagering now closed gents, if you have an offer feel free to let me know...but seeing as nobody wanted a piece of the "lock" at +250, we might be looking at 4 digit odds before someone's willing to make a bet. Pretty smart crowd we got here.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Just to clarify, looks like even though technical problems on SBR's side kept most people from entering the last couple dailies (and practically handed the few people who could play high places), it was a tournament that played, so we'll count it for the annual totals. Bit of bad luck for me, but shouldn't change anything. Not sure how many people made it into bobbo's tourney, but I'm guessing even if it was only 4 people he'd have to run hot to take 1st

[BeerDog99]

In my opinion, that tourney should not count. If you were not allowed to play because of SBR and Bobby got points because he somehow pre-registered and folded his way to a significant cash, that is not fair.

[Triple_D_Bet]

In my opinion, that tourney should not count. If you were not allowed to play because of SBR and Bobby got points because he somehow pre-registered and folded his way to a significant cash, that is not fair.

I played yesterday in an earlier tourney before there were any problems, so there's no issue of not being able to play....an even if there were, seems like an "act of god" kinda thing. It's a bit of bad luck, but not bobbo's fault, even if it does help him out. It's all good...now the score will be closer than it would have been otherwise, and maybe that will allow bobbo to lose by a small enough amount that he can hang on to hsi delusions of greatness

[playersonly69]

I think that only 2 people were in it tripled. It absolutely should not count

[playersonly69]

I think that only 2 people were in it tripled. It absolutely should not count

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

In my opinion, that tourney should not count. If you were not allowed to play because of SBR and Bobby got points because he somehow pre-registered and folded his way to a significant cash, that is not fair.

Totally agree w/doggy here.
Additionally, it's a question of Honor, to me.
No way I'm counting the pts if it were me and I got pts simply cuz I was one of the couple peeps that could sign on, thus being GIFTED the pts
I'd feel dishonorable accepting the total counting... I wouldn't have EARNED them.

Also, I didn't get to play yesterday like many others, but I also wouldn't have played if I was the only one in the tourney (like empiremaker) or, just a couple people were playing (like bobby & sho, apparently). It was beyond obvious something was wrong and it's just squirrelly to accept the pts counting for World Cup or Leaderboard.

p.s. -- by reading his post in the SBR tech thread, bobby seemed proud that he jumped in w/ 1 other person thus knowing he'd be gifted something for nothing

[bobbywaves]

All you uneducated losers can go fukk yourself. Try getting your facts straight, before running your mouth chumps. I played the 7pm last night, there were 25 players in it. Surely a superuser like Bitter should be able to confirm this. Otherwise feel free to confirm with runner-up ShogunRua, or 3rd place finisher Stefan-eur.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

bobbo, this is what I posted in the SBR World Cup Update thread. Could you kindly answer it? TIA
If I was wrong in my interpretation of your post, then so be it, I was wrong
I have zero problems admitting when I'm wrong or mistaken; Centaur just has to realize that I actually HAVE TO BE WRONG

BUT, do Centaur a favor and link this post so he can see it... he might just have an orgasm.

OTHER POST:

I'm asking bobby cuz I wasn't watching: forget how many were registered... how many were actually signed on and playing? Were all the players able to sign on w/ the tech problems going on?

Your post in the other thread seemed to imply only a few were playing (not saying that's the case, but it seemed to be what you implied)

edit: this is the post, given all the probs peeps were having signing on and only a few players in the 9 & 11(only empiremaker in the 11), not hard to interpret "with rua" as being similar
Notice on SBR Network performance

[downsouth]

Most registered could not log on to play unless they left it logged on. Given auto boot after number of hands played reached limit

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

Most registered could not log on to play unless they left it logged on. Given auto boot after number of hands played reached limit

Ah... so it wasn't really a real tourney then, was it?
Many apparently didn't play.
Yet, bobbo is clearly playing it off as everything was normal.

Maybe I need to update my "Most Disingenuous List"?

[Triple_D_Bet]

Totally agree w/doggy here.
Additionally, it's a question of Honor, to me.
No way I'm counting the pts if it were me and I got pts simply cuz I was one of the couple peeps that could sign on, thus being GIFTED the pts
I'd feel dishonorable accepting the total counting... I wouldn't have EARNED them.

Also, I didn't get to play yesterday like many others, but I also wouldn't have played if I was the only one in the tourney (like empiremaker) or, just a couple people were playing (like bobby & sho, apparently). It was beyond obvious something was wrong and it's just squirrelly to accept the pts counting for World Cup or Leaderboard.

p.s. -- by reading his post in the SBR tech thread, bobby seemed proud that he jumped in w/ 1 other person thus knowing he'd be gifted something for nothing

I agree with you biter; specifically, if I was on the receiving end of a gift like this, I'd offer to have the day not count for my totals, and to add another day to the contest to even things out. Definitely the honorable thing to do.

Bobbo's not a particularly honorable guy like this though, more of an angle-shooter who will do whatever he can (trying to play tournaments with a couple less people, blatantly stalling near bubble) to try to cash...because it's the only way he can hope to win . I have no problem crediting bobbo with the win, because I know I'm still highly likely to win, and I want to prove beyond any doubt that he can't win even when everything goes his way

[Triple_D_Bet]

All you uneducated losers can go fukk yourself. Try getting your facts straight, before running your mouth chumps. I played the 7pm last night, there were 25 players in it. Surely a superuser like Bitter should be able to confirm this. Otherwise feel free to confirm with runner-up ShogunRua, or 3rd place finisher Stefan-eur.

Maybe you're right, maybe you're not being completely honest (pending the answer to DS' assertion below). Your entry certainly looks typical for you, with a last minute entry based on you thinking you can compete against a few less people and try to eek out a mincash easier. Regardless, when SBR has technical difficulties and you also take down a 1st place (extremely rare for you due to your terrible playing ability and focus on min cashes), I'm sure you can see why it's a reasonable conclusion to jump to.

[bobbywaves]

Most registered could not log on to play unless they left it logged on. Given auto boot after number of hands played reached limit

Then how come there wasn't a sharp decrease in players after auto boot? How could the 7pm tourney have taken 95 minutes to complete, with just a handful of players as you suggest?

ShogunRua is saying the same thing I am, the 7pm tourney ran fine.

[Triple_D_Bet]

To summarize info from other threads: shogun came forward and said 7 PM (tourney bobbo won) seemed to play out normally, so doesn't appear bobbo was angle-shooting here, and there's no issue

[bobbywaves]

To summarize info from other threads: shogun came forward and said 7 PM (tourney bobbo won) seemed to play out normally, so doesn't appear bobbo was angle-shooting here, and there's no issue

No chit Sherlock, Waves speaking the truth as usual.

[Robber]

I played today for the first time in a very long time and guess what? My ROI is still higher than Bobby's.

[bobbywaves]

I played today for the first time in a very long time and guess what? My ROI is still higher than Bobby's.

Obviously, as your poker deposits equal a pathetic 39. Deposit 7,800 like myself & then talk to me chump.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Obviously, as your poker deposits equal a pathetic 39. Deposit 7,800 like myself & then talk to me chump.

Per your original definition of "ROI" (before you changed it to try to make yourself look better), Robber's better than you. If you're going to create a made-up category to make yourself feel like a winner, you should at least make it narrow enough so you're not getting beat by a good number of people at it

[Robber]

Bobby is an idiot

He challenged me to play again and i finally found some time.

Veni vidi vici

[bobbywaves]

It should be common sense that 39 poker deposits means absolutely nothing. But when dealing with Tripe & Robber, all common sense gets thrown out the window.

Robber can get lucky & win one tourney & have the best ROI on forum, that makes him better than me or any of the top players like Sinmiedo & Shogun? Of course not. Play a man sized sample, then come back & talk to me son.

[Robber]

Wavros' definition of a man sized sample means playing every tournament for 4 years straight like him

I've finished top 5 in more than half the tourneys I've played and they've all had 30+ people

Those tournaments are for men, not little boys like yourself. Can't fold and stall to a cash with over 30 people entered bobbo

[Triple_D_Bet]

It should be common sense that 39 poker deposits means absolutely nothing. But when dealing with Tripe & Robber, all common sense gets thrown out the window.

Robber can get lucky & win one tourney & have the best ROI on forum, that makes him better than me or any of the top players like Sinmiedo & Shogun? Of course not. Play a man sized sample, then come back & talk to me son.

Why would anyone assume you wanted to apply common sense to a definition that defies it?

[bobbywaves]

I've finished top 5 in more than half the tourneys I've played and they've all had 30+ people

Wow...that would be 3, as you only played 5 tourneys.

Again, do something over an extended period of time & then talk to me. Like joining our annual challenge for example. There's only 6 players ahead of me since January, & you obviously wouldn't be one of them chump: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

[bobbywaves]

August update several days early, since we're at the World Cup Break: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

According to the convenient link above, I'm at 14,940. I have Tripe at 12,900 unofficially, perhaps he'll confirm or deny.

For Tripe's sake, hopefully there's no truth to the end of poker rumor by poster Onerous. Although paying Waves 29k now or paying 29k in 5 months, hardly makes a difference.

[Triple_D_Bet]

August update several days early, since we're at the World Cup Break: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

According to the convenient link above, I'm at 14,940. I have Tripe at 12,900 unofficially, perhaps he'll confirm or deny.

For Tripe's sake, hopefully there's no truth to the end of poker rumor by poster Onerous. Although paying Waves 29k now or paying 29k in 5 months, hardly makes a difference.

Lol... Yeah, I bet you're checking in early for reasons unrelated to your lucky 1st place finish today. Same way we didn't hear a peep out of you about the supposed importance of being on a leaderboard until you got back on it after months absence

I think you've spouted that rumor more than anyone... Can't entirely blame you, it's about the only chance you'd have to win!