[Wallco99]

What happens if Oakland wins and all these parlays aren't complete, how do you even know if you would be playing a (D) bet tomorrow? Just like Tampa Bay yesterday. What if that soccer game loses Saturday, and you never had a chance to play the (D) bet that you skipped because you thought you were going to be an automatic winner betting soccer games in an MLB system. This is all so stupid. Then, the option is either to take a loss on a play that actually won, or play your (D) bet later which is completely out of order of where it should be played and defies any system criteria. Systems that have this many plays every day usually get crushed, now I see why. There is no way in hell your previous backtested results that you shared with everyone to get followers included all this nonsense, which means, there has never actually been a backtest of this syste. Anyone who blindly follows any system that has not been thoroughly tested is as foolish as the guy posting it.

[Wallco99]

The system records should be kept as if it were played to a tee, by the rules. Then you could do whatever you want on the side and keep your own records separate since you have all your spreadsheets anyway. That way integrity of the "system" is correct, since most people play it as dictated by your rules, regardless of how big unit size bets get.
Jmo

It's not just your opinion, it's the way it is supposed to be done or what the hell's the point of any of it.

[whtsox13]

What a cluster-fukk.

[alexknyc]

Nine parlays? I'm good with parlays designed to reduce juice on big bets and I'm willing to go with a team I've heard of in European soccer but four soccer teams was out of my comfort zone.

I just sacked up and took Oakland ML. Had a huge amount at risk but I don't know shit about Austrian or Portuguese soccer so the nine parlays were right out. ML was a real risk and, if I were smart, I'd have taken RL but I've been screwed by one-run wins and didn't want that to happen here. As it turns out, I'd have been fine but that's all in hindsight. I consider myself quite fortunate to have won such a big bet and hope to never have to do that again.

Good luck to those who parlayed. Hope all nine hit for you.

[Stifler]

What happens if Oakland wins and all these parlays aren't complete, how do you even know if you would be playing a (D) bet tomorrow? Just like Tampa Bay yesterday. What if that soccer game loses Saturday, and you never had a chance to play the (D) bet that you skipped because you thought you were going to be an automatic winner betting soccer games in an MLB system. This is all so stupid. Then, the option is either to take a loss on a play that actually won, or play your (D) bet later which is completely out of order of where it should be played and defies any system criteria. Systems that have this many plays every day usually get crushed, now I see why. There is no way in hell your previous backtested results that you shared with everyone to get followers included all this nonsense, which means, there has never actually been a backtest of this syste. Anyone who blindly follows any system that has not been thoroughly tested is as foolish as the guy posting it.

the outcome of the mlb game decides if the series continues or ends. I wont comment all the other bs written here, cause i honestly dont care at all. Backtests were made, thats what i can tell, ofc im not expecting numbers like that, but i already said that multiply times.

oh and btw

Systems that have this many plays every day usually get crushed

system is falling down 2H, thats correct. I do have a theory for that, but im not going to explain it here. And still i can tell that the system is +units. Very crushy....

[Stifler]

Nine parlays? I'm good with parlays designed to reduce juice on big bets and I'm willing to go with a team I've heard of in European soccer but four soccer teams was out of my comfort zone.

I just sacked up and took Oakland ML. Had a huge amount at risk but I don't know shit about Austrian or Portuguese soccer so the nine parlays were right out. ML was a real risk and, if I were smart, I'd have taken RL but I've been screwed by one-run wins and didn't want that to happen here. As it turns out, I'd have been fine but that's all in hindsight. I consider myself quite fortunate to have won such a big bet and hope to never have to do that again.

Good luck to those who parlayed. Hope all nine hit for you.

i could have made just 1 parlay, but i was thinking about that, and rather split it into a few ones and told myself to risk something around 10 units overall.

[illisdre]

system is falling down 2H, thats correct. I do have a theory for that, but im not going to explain it here. And still i can tell that the system is +units. Very crushy....

thought i had something ground breaking.. but i was just high:
"my theory is... the amount of losses have accumulated like a chain reaction, a firmer filter may be needed here."

[Stifler]

15.08.2013

S1

(A Bet) Stl fade: Pittsburgh 2,13 0,885u

S2

(A Bet) Pit fade: St.louis 1,82 1,22u

S3

(D Bet) Hou fade: Oak 1,333 3,00u|Oak+Ger 1,705 5,674u|Oak+Bayern+BVB 1,989 9,782u | multiply parlays - open
(C Bet) Oak: Oakland 1,333 3,00u | Oakland 1,417 9,592u | multiply parlays - open
(A Bet) Det: Detroit 1,518 1,93u
(A Bet) SD: San Diego 1,709 1,41u
(A Bet) CHW fade: Minnesota 1,73 1,37u

P1

(B Bet) M.Buehrle: Toronto -1,5 2,55 0,645u | Toronto 2,15 1,43u
(A Bet) D.Haren: Washington -1,5 2,34 0,746u

P2

(A Bet) D.Haren: Washington 1,641 1,56u

records:
S1: W 38 | L 1 (+10,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 5 (-32,622 units)
S3: W 179 | L 7 (-4,445 units)
P1: W 22 | L 1 (+13,971 units)
P2: W 41 | L 3 (-1,25 units)
P3: W 45 | L 1 (+29,751 units)


pending:
- P3 U.Jimenez, D Bet on next start on the road
- P3 G.Gonzalez, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 B.Norris fade, D Bet on next start
- P2 B.Norris, D Bet on next start
- P1 D.Fister, D Bet on next start
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 16.08.2013
- S2 LAA, D Bet on 16.08.2013
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- S3 Oak, C Bet open till wekkend
- S3 Hou fade, D Bet open till weekend
- S3 TB, B Bet open till weekend
- S3 SD, b Bet on 16.08.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

- watch out, this S1 Stl fade B Bet is not the one played yesterday.

16.08.2013

S1

(B Bet) Stl fade: Cincinnati 1,752 1,33u | Cubs 2,31 1,779u

S2

(D Bet) LAA: LAA 1,962 1,04u | LAA 2,35 1,511u | LAA 2,04 3,414u | LAA 1,61 11,418u

S3

(B Bet) SD: San Diego 1,709 1,41u | SD 1,725 3,324u
(A Bet) LAA: LAA 1,61 1,64u
(A Bet) Balti: Baltimore 1,556 1,80u

P2

(A Bet) Z.Greinke: Dodgers 1,926 1,08u

P3

(A Bet) J.Niese: NY Mets 2,27 0,787u

[Wallco99]

the outcome of the mlb game decides if the series continues or ends. I wont comment all the other bs written here, cause i honestly dont care at all. Backtests were made, thats what i can tell, ofc im not expecting numbers like that, but i already said that multiply times.

oh and btw



system is falling down 2H, thats correct. I do have a theory for that, but im not going to explain it here. And still i can tell that the system is +units. Very crushy....

If you say so! But with 19 open bets and your BOGUS stats barely even showing a profit, I wouldn't exactly call this profitable. Actually, I wouldn't even call it a system anymore. It's starting to crumble like the NBA "system" did, and expose you for the fraud you are. At least in the NBA the stats were accurate, unlike this mess where the results are completely fabricated so you can pat yourself on the back for something that really isn't. You can post whatever stats you want, but anyone who played this system the way you laid it out knows they are down money, and posting fake profits isn't going to bring their money back.

[Wallco99]

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

You might has well just get rid of this sentence!

[hj443]

good

[and24]

Stifler has never issued guarantee he would make profit at the end of season and repeatedly told that nobody had to play as he does.
Therefore you don't have any rights to complain about neither him nor his style.

[sportscreep1]

If you say so! But with 19 open bets and your BOGUS stats barely even showing a profit, I wouldn't exactly call this profitable. Actually, I wouldn't even call it a system anymore. It's starting to crumble like the NBA "system" did, and expose you for the fraud you are. At least in the NBA the stats were accurate, unlike this mess where the results are completely fabricated so you can pat yourself on the back for something that really isn't. You can post whatever stats you want, but anyone who played this system the way you laid it out knows they are down money, and posting fake profits isn't going to bring their money back.

I don't have exact figures, but the system played correctly overall is still profitable (not including open series), not a lot but I believe it's about 13 units up. I don't agree with posting the records based on parlays made by the one individual, instead of posting 2 diff records personal and official system, but I have personally parlayed a couple d bets to reduce amount wagered, but they won, and I still only do it to win the 1 unit or 2 based on the play. Last year was way up so system still good.

[Wallco99]

I don't have exact figures, but the system played correctly overall is still profitable (not including open series), not a lot but I believe it's about 13 units up. I don't agree with posting the records based on parlays made by the one individual, instead of posting 2 diff records personal and official system, but I have personally parlayed a couple d bets to reduce amount wagered, but they won, and I still only do it to win the 1 unit or 2 based on the play. Last year was way up so system still good.

You don't know if the system was up last year because it was never tested the way he intended to play it. And NO, system properly played is down for this season. Why waste time with a backtest if you play it completely different? I know why, so he can say "Everybody look at me, I am great, look what I came up with". When in reality, it's not anything remotely close to what he boasted about.

[mrk77]

I don't see Stifler boasting about anything. Wallco, you have a chip on your shoulder and need to relax man lol

[Stifler]

16.08.2013

S1

(B Bet) Stl fade: Cincinnati 1,752 1,33u | Cubs 2,31 1,779u

S2

(D Bet) LAA: LAA 1,962 1,04u | LAA 2,35 1,511u | LAA 2,04 3,414u | LAA 1,61 11,418u

S3

(B Bet) SD: San Diego 1,709 1,41u | SD 1,725 3,324u
(A Bet) LAA: LAA 1,61 1,64u
(A Bet) Balti: Baltimore 1,556 1,80u

P2

(A Bet) Z.Greinke: Dodgers 1,926 1,08u

P3

(A Bet) J.Niese: NY Mets 2,27 0,787u

S2 LAA series lost = -17,383 units

records:
S1: W 39 | L 1 (+11,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 6 (-50,005 units)
S3: W 179 | L 7 (-4,445 units)
P1: W 22 | L 1 (+13,971 units)
P2: W 42 | L 3 (-0,25 units)
P3: W 46 | L 1 (+30,751 units)


pending:
- P3 U.Jimenez, D Bet on next start on the road
- P3 G.Gonzalez, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 B.Norris fade, D Bet on next start
- P2 B.Norris fade, D Bet on next start
- P1 D.Fister, D Bet on next start
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- S3 Oak, C Bet open till wekkend
- S3 Hou fade, D Bet open till weekend
- S3 TB, B Bet open till weekend
- S3 SD, C Bet on 17.08.2013
- S3 LAA, B Bet on 17.08.2013
- S3 Balti, B Bet on 17.08.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

P1

(C Bet) B.Norris fade: Houston 3,23 0,448u | San Diego 2,15 1,259u| San Francisco -1,5 2,90 1,425u

P2

(C Bet) B.Norris fade: Houston 3,23 0,448u | San Diego 2,15 1,259u | San Francisco 1,87 3,11u

ive see that Norris started on 14th august and lost that game which would have been a winner on P2, but a loss on P1, cause Arizona didnt win on the RL. Gonna add 1 loss to the P1 system and adding the loss amount on both series to the system records.

records:
S1: W 39 | L 1 (+11,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 6 (-50,005 units)
S3: W 179 | L 7 (-4,445 units)
P1: W 22 | L 2 (+10,839 units)
P2: W 42 | L 3 (-5,067 units)
P3: W 46 | L 1 (+30,751 units)


pending:
- P3 U.Jimenez, D Bet on next start on the road
- P3 G.Gonzalez, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Fister, D Bet on next start
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- S3 Oak, C Bet open till wekkend
- S3 Hou fade, D Bet open till weekend
- S3 TB, B Bet open till weekend
- S3 SD, C Bet on 17.08.2013
- S3 LAA, B Bet on 17.08.2013
- S3 Balti, B Bet on 17.08.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

- i have listed P1/P2 B.Norris series as a starting B Bet due to the missed A Bet i also missed (explained 1 post above)

17.08.2013

S3

(C Bet) SD: San Diego 1,709 1,41u | SD 1,725 3,324u | SD 1,787 7,286u
(B Bet) LAA: LAA 1,61 1,64u | LAA 1,478 5,523u
(B Bet) Balti: Baltimore 1,556 1,80u | Baltimore 1,535 5,234u

P1

(D Bet) D.Fister: Det rl 1,901 1,11u | Det rl 2,30 1,623u | Det rl 2,36 2,745u | Detroit-1,5 1,99 6,543u
(B Bet) B.Norris: Baltimore -1,5 2,09 0,917u

P2

(B Bet) B.Norris: Baltimore 1,535 1,869u

P3

(D Bet) U.Jimenez: Cle 2,36 0,735u | Cle 2,11 1,563u | Cle 1,99 3,331u | Cleveland 2,27 5,22u
(B Bet) H.Kuroda: Yankees 2,14 0,877u | Yankees 2,15 1,632u
(A Bet) D.Fister: Detroit 1,478 2,09u
(A Bet) T.Wood fade: St.Louis 1,746 1,34u

[fizzer555]

Stifler,

Norris didn't start that game for Baltimore on the 14th August.

It was a 14-innings game and having used 8 pitchers already the Orioles had to turn to Norris. I remember it well - with money on the Orioles his first 8 pitches were all balls and he ended up taking the loss!

[skyscrapers]

Stifler,

Norris didn't start that game for Baltimore on the 14th August.

It was a 14-innings game and having used 8 pitchers already the Orioles had to turn to Norris. I remember it well - with money on the Orioles his first 8 pitches were all balls and he ended up taking the loss!

Ya Chris Tillman started that game but Norris came on to pitch in relief in the 14th and took the loss.
Today should be just the D bets and no B bets.

[vigster]

Anyone else playing the two B bets on Balt?

[Stifler]

Ya Chris Tillman started that game but Norris came on to pitch in relief in the 14th and took the loss.
Today should be just the D bets and no B bets.

those B Bets are plays anyway. Cause im using covers stats for research. And covers listed that lost, so if i would have backtested it i would use that data. Thats why i was taking the loss on the 2 open series.
Its a bit tricky i have to admit, but if i would have backtested it i would go with that stats. Feel free to play the D bet today, i wont....

[Stifler]

17.08.2013

S3

(C Bet) SD: San Diego 1,709 1,41u | SD 1,725 3,324u | SD 1,787 7,286u
(B Bet) LAA: LAA 1,61 1,64u | LAA 1,478 5,523u
(B Bet) Balti: Baltimore 1,556 1,80u | Baltimore 1,535 5,234u

P1

(D Bet) D.Fister: Det rl 1,901 1,11u | Det rl 2,30 1,623u | Det rl 2,36 2,745u | Detroit-1,5 1,99 6,543u
(B Bet) B.Norris: Baltimore -1,5 2,09 0,917u

P2

(B Bet) B.Norris: Baltimore 1,535 1,869u

P3

(D Bet) U.Jimenez: Cle 2,36 0,735u | Cle 2,11 1,563u | Cle 1,99 3,331u | Cleveland 2,27 5,22u
(B Bet) H.Kuroda: Yankees 2,14 0,877u | Yankees 2,15 1,632u
(A Bet) D.Fister: Detroit 1,478 2,09u
(A Bet) T.Wood fade: St.Louis 1,746 1,34u

P1 D.Fister series lost = -12,021 units

records:
S1: W 39 | L 1 (+11,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 6 (-50,005 units)
S3: W 182 | L 7 (-1,445 units)
P1: W 23 | L 3 (-0,182 units)
P2: W 43 | L 3 (-4,067 units)
P3: W 49 | L 1 (+33,751 units)


pending:
- P3 G.Gonzalez, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- S3 Oak, C Bet open till wekkend
- S3 Hou fade, D Bet open till weekend
- S3 TB, B Bet open till weekend

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

18.08.2013

S2

(A Bet) Ari fade: Pittsburgh 1,794 1,26u

P3

(B Bet) M.Bumgarner: San Francisco 2,15 0,87u | SF 1,617 3,031u
(B Bet) G.Gonzalez: Washington 2,25 0,80u | Washington 2,24 1,452u
(A Bet) C.Sabathia fade: Boston 1,813 1,23u

[Stifler]

S3

(C Bet) TB: Tampa Bay 1,513 1,95u | TB + ger 1,652 4,525u | Tampa+Bayern+BVB 1,948 7,885u

(D Bet) Hou fade: Oak 1,333 3,00u|Oak+Ger 1,705 5,674u|Oak+Bayern+BVB 1,989 9,782u | multiply parlays
(C Bet) Oak: Oakland 1,333 3,00u | Oakland 1,417 9,592u | multiply parlays

1. Oakland + RB Salzburg + Sporting Lisbon + Ajax Amsterdam + Dortmund + Bayern 6,12 3u
2. Oakland -1,5 + RB Salzburg + Sporting Lisbon + Ajax Amsterdam + Dortmund + Bayern 8,24 1u
3. Oakland + Dortmund + Bayern 2,11 2u
4. Oakland -1,5 + Dortmund + Bayern -1,5 4,07 1u
5. RB Salzburg + Sporting Lisbon + Ajax Amsterdam + Dortmund + Bayern 4,18 1u
6. Oakland + Sporting Lisbon + Ajax 2,81 1u
7. Oakland + Salzburg 2,21 1u
8. Oak -1,5 + Salzburg -1 + Sporting -1/-1,5 + Ajax -1/-1,5 + BVB -2/-2,5 + Bayern -1,5 46,75 0,5u
9. Oak + Sporting + Bayern -1,5 + Ajax -1/-1,5 + BVB -2/-2,5 + Salzburg -1 23,88 0,5u

Salzburg ****** it...should have went with a home team...will count those 3 series as a win, cause Oakland an TB won, but will add the -units.

make it overall for both Oakland series: -35,018 units

records:
S1: W 39 | L 1 (+11,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 6 (-50,005 units)
S3: W 185 | L 7 (-35,463 units)
P1: W 23 | L 3 (-0,182 units)
P2: W 43 | L 3 (-4,067 units)
P3: W 49 | L 1 (+33,751 units)


pending:
- P3 G.Gonzalez, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, B Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

18.08.2013

S2

(A Bet) Ari fade: Pittsburgh 1,794 1,26u

P3

(B Bet) M.Bumgarner: San Francisco 2,15 0,87u | SF 1,617 3,031u
(B Bet) G.Gonzalez: Washington 2,25 0,80u | Washington 2,24 1,452u
(A Bet) C.Sabathia fade: Boston 1,813 1,23u

records:
S1: W 39 | L 1 (+11,285 units)
S2: W 34 | L 6 (-50,005 units)
S3: W 185 | L 7 (-35,463 units)
P1: W 23 | L 3 (-0,182 units)
P2: W 43 | L 3 (-4,067 units)
P3: W 49 | L 1 (+33,751 units)


pending:
- P3 G.Gonzalez, C Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Price, D Bet on next start
- P3 H.Kuroda, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start on the road
- S2 Ari fade, B Bet on 19.08.2013

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

19.08.2013

S1

(A Bet) Col fade: Phillies 1,855 1,17u

S2

(B Bet) Ari fade: Pittsburgh 1,794 1,26u | Cincinnati 1,602 3,754u

S3

(A Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,602 1,661u

P1

(D Bet) D.Price: TB-1,5 2,00 1,00u | TB-1,5 2,37 1,46u | TB-1,5 1,787 4,396u | TB -1,5 2,35 5,819u

[Hebodk]

Still dealing with a 100 unit BR ??

[Grinder12000]

Pele that laugh at others losing are have the brains of children. I really don't understand why they let teenagers on this forum.

if you started with a 100 unit bankroll you are down 60. So,what's the big deal, unless you really didn't have a 100 unit bankroll. And in that case you are just fooling yourself and should not be sports wagering.

[Stifler]

19.08.2013

S1

(A Bet) Col fade: Phillies 1,855 1,17u

S2

(B Bet) Ari fade: Pittsburgh 1,794 1,26u | Cincinnati 1,602 3,754u

S3

(A Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,602 1,661u

P1

(D Bet) D.Price: TB-1,5 2,00 1,00u | TB-1,5 2,37 1,46u | TB-1,5 1,787 4,396u | TB -1,5 2,35 5,819u

P1 D.Price series lost = -12,675 units

records:
S1: W 40 | L 1 (+12,285 units)
S2: W 35 | L 6 (-49,005 units)
S3: W 186 | L 7 (-34,463 units)
P1: W 23 | L 4 (-12,857 units)
P2: W 43 | L 3 (-4,067 units)
P3: W 49 | L 1 (+33,751 units)


pending:
- P3 G.Gonzalez, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 H.Kuroda, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- P1 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- P2 D.Haren, B Bet on next start
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start on the road

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

P1

(A Bet) D.Haren: Washington -1,5 2,34 0,746u

P2

(A Bet) D.Haren: Washington 1,641 1,56u

hm covers again shows D.haren (probably substituted) played on 17th augus and wash won that game , which would be a winner on both. Im taking that lost amount on both A bets.

records:
S1: W 40 | L 1 (+12,285 units)
S2: W 35 | L 6 (-49,005 units)
S3: W 186 | L 7 (-34,463 units)
P1: W 23 | L 4 (-13,603 units)
P2: W 43 | L 3 (-5,627 units)
P3: W 49 | L 1 (+33,751 units)


pending:
- P3 G.Gonzalez, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 H.Kuroda, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start @home
- P3 M.Bumgarner, C Bet on next start on the road
- P3 M.Scherzer, B Bet on next start on the road
- S1 Stl fade, B Bet on 22.08.2013
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, B Bet on next start on the road

________________________________________ _____________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3

[Stifler]

20.08.2013

S1

(A Bet) Pit fade: San Diego 2,11 0,901u
(A Bet) SD fade: Pittsburgh 1,833 1,20u

S3

(A Bet) NYY: Yankees - no line atm (game 1)

P2

(A Bet) J.Danks fade: Kansas City 1,588 1,70u

[Hebodk]

Pele that laugh at others losing are have the brains of children. I really don't understand why they let teenagers on this forum.

if you started with a 100 unit bankroll you are down 60. So,what's the big deal, unless you really didn't have a 100 unit bankroll. And in that case you are just fooling yourself and should not be sports wagering.

what about the pending series Braniac?

[Wallco99]

what about the pending series Braniac?

That comes out of the reload hundred!