Not sure why you are so defensive and feel the need to attack me. This isnt you versus me. I always acknowledge that I have more to learn, not sure you can say the same when you are trying to argue against a fact and are too stubborn to just admit that beating closers is a very important part of sports investing. You can attack me all you want, but you still sound silly trying to argue against accepted fact.
Use your own example of the two dog bettors, one who buys at +140 and the other who buys at +150...who makes more money. Well, it's clearly the guy who beat the closer and got +150. He made more than $10 on $100 bet. Now, extrapolate that over 1000 bets. The capper that gets a consistent 10 cent advantage on his bets over those 1000 plays makes much more money than the guy who bet a worse line.
Now, you can attack me or tout your thread in here as king capper all you want, but my point is that you make yourself sound silly when you say beating the closer doesn't matter because it's a a fact of investing that it is vitally important.
I never said I'm the best at beating the closer or that I am a better investor than you. I'm not here to get into some type of contest with you. However, you made an absurd comment that beating the closer does not matter and I merely illustrated how your comment is wrong.
Lets try this....you are the best capper in the world sir, I hereby admit that you are much better than me and everyone should go to your thread and tail you, however, despite all your greatness, you sound like an ignorant noob when you say that beating the closer does not matter because you are going against an accepted mathematical fact.
Remember, this isnt me versus you, it's you versus a fact of sports investing and your inability to admit that you are wrong. Don't be stubborn. It is unbecoming of such a great capper like yourself.
Use your own example of the two dog bettors, one who buys at +140 and the other who buys at +150...who makes more money. Well, it's clearly the guy who beat the closer and got +150. He made more than $10 on $100 bet. Now, extrapolate that over 1000 bets. The capper that gets a consistent 10 cent advantage on his bets over those 1000 plays makes much more money than the guy who bet a worse line.
Now, you can attack me or tout your thread in here as king capper all you want, but my point is that you make yourself sound silly when you say beating the closer doesn't matter because it's a a fact of investing that it is vitally important.
I never said I'm the best at beating the closer or that I am a better investor than you. I'm not here to get into some type of contest with you. However, you made an absurd comment that beating the closer does not matter and I merely illustrated how your comment is wrong.
Lets try this....you are the best capper in the world sir, I hereby admit that you are much better than me and everyone should go to your thread and tail you, however, despite all your greatness, you sound like an ignorant noob when you say that beating the closer does not matter because you are going against an accepted mathematical fact.
Remember, this isnt me versus you, it's you versus a fact of sports investing and your inability to admit that you are wrong. Don't be stubborn. It is unbecoming of such a great capper like yourself.
