Here's the KVB NCAAF Visiting Dog Fund with links to each play and a crude closing line comparison.
This Fund was 4-4, -.26 units in week 6 and, notably, was 2-4-2 against the closing line...
This Fund had a good year last year both in units and the closing line comparison but notice the array of chart patterns when compared....


At this point we've experienced, in the Unit chart, a very similar sideways pullback as to last year except when we take into account the closing comparison chart it's a very different story.
Let's walk through the charts...
Notice since the beginning of last year, the closing average started down and was basically sideways while the unit chart rose. Then as the closing average chart rose the unit chart went sideways only to have the closing average chart go back to sideways while the unit chart rose again.
That's a mouthful but now we are at a point, this season, where the two charts seem to be in sync. What does this mean for the Fund? It could mean we go sideways, and we do for a while. There could be volatility, but that unit chart could float between 14 units and 18 units all season.
Let's see how it tests levels going forward and let's see if it can first avert a further slide. Mainly, I wanted to demonstrate the different ways we can look at these charts when dealing with these functions.
Now to the Haymaker Fund, which is just one or two wins away from even, despite going 9-26 so far this season...
This Fund was 4-4, -.26 units in week 6 and, notably, was 2-4-2 against the closing line...
1 Unit | Closing | Beat | BTC | ||||
Record | Date | NCAAF Visiting Dog Fund | per bet | Line | Closer? | Average | |
385 | 0-1 | 7-Sep | STANFORD +3.5 (-115) | -1 | 3 | Y | 0.5 |
387 | 1-1 | CAL +14 (-110) | 0.91 | 13.5 | Y | 0.5 | |
401 | 1-2 | KENNESAW ST +1.5 (-120) | -1 | 3.5 | N | -2 | |
423 | 1-3 | G WEBB +28 (-120) | -1 | 31 | N | -3 | |
425 | 2-3 | MAINE +10.5 (-120) | 0.83 | 7.5 | Y | 3 | |
427 | 2-4 | NC A&T +29.5 (-120) | -1 | 27.5 | Y | 2 | |
117 | 2-5 | 14-Sep | MIA (OH) +16 (-105) | -1 | 17 | N | -1 |
133 | 2-6 | AKRON +6 (-105) | -1 | 2.5 | Y | 3.5 | |
147 | 3-6 | UNLV +20 (-105) | 0.95 | 18.5 | Y | 1.5 | |
171 | 4-6 | OHIO +5.5 (-105) | 0.95 | 4 | Y | 1.5 | |
225 | 5-6 | WEBER ST +10 (-120) | 0.83 | 7.5 | Y | 2.5 | |
233 | 5-7 | MISSOURI ST +29 (-120) | -1 | 31.5 | N | -2.5 | |
339 | 5-8 | 21-Sep | W MICHIGAN +5.5 (-110) | -1 | 3.5 | Y | 2 |
343 | 5-9 | MICHIGAN +3 (+100) | -1 | 3 | PUSH | 0 | |
361 | 5-10 | KENTUCKY +6 (-102) | -1 | 6 | PUSH | 0 | |
367 | 6-10 | AUBURN +4 (-105) | 0.95 | 4 | PUSH | 0 | |
411 | 7-10 | S ILLINOIS +21.5 (-120) | 0.83 | 23 | N | -1.5 | |
111 | 8-10 | 27-Sep | ARIZONA ST +5.5 (-105) | 0.95 | 4 | Y | 1.5 |
113 | 9-10 | 28-Sep | N' WESTERN +24 (-105) | 0.95 | 23 | Y | 1 |
123 | 9-11 | BUFFALO +2 (-110) | -1 | 2.5 | N | -0.5 | |
135 | 9-12 | RUTGERS +27.5 (-110) | -1 | 27.5 | PUSH | 0 | |
143 | 9-13 | UNLV +9.5 (-105) | -1 | 8 | Y | 1.5 | |
153 | 10-13 | INDIANA +14.5 (-110) | 0.91 | 14 | Y | 0.5 | |
163 | 10-14 | KANSAS +16 (-105) | -1 | 14.5 | Y | 1.5 | |
167 | 10-15 | MISS ST +11 (-105) | -1 | 7.5 | Y | 3.5 | |
187 | 11-15 | UTEP +25.5 (-110) | 0.91 | 26 | N | -0.5 | |
325 | 12-15 | 5-Oct | PITT +5 (-107) | 0.93 | 3.5 | Y | 1.5 |
337 | 13-15 | V TECH +13.5 (-105) | 0.95 | 14 | N | -0.5 | |
349 | 14-15 | CAL +18 (-105) | 0.95 | 21 | N | -3 | |
355 | 14-16 | IOWA +4 (-105) | -1 | 4 | PUSH | 0 | |
359 | 14-17 | RICE +8.5 (-105) | -1 | 10 | N | -1.5 | |
361 | 15-17 | N'WESTERN +7 (-110) | 0.91 | 7.5 | N | -0.5 | |
373 | 15-18 | TCU +4 (-105) | -1 | 3 | Y | 1 | |
391 | 15-19 | MICHIGAN ST +20 (-111) | -1 | 20 | PUSH | 0 | |
15-19 | Total | -5.29 | 17-11-6 | 0.367647 |
This Fund had a good year last year both in units and the closing line comparison but notice the array of chart patterns when compared....


At this point we've experienced, in the Unit chart, a very similar sideways pullback as to last year except when we take into account the closing comparison chart it's a very different story.
Let's walk through the charts...
Notice since the beginning of last year, the closing average started down and was basically sideways while the unit chart rose. Then as the closing average chart rose the unit chart went sideways only to have the closing average chart go back to sideways while the unit chart rose again.
That's a mouthful but now we are at a point, this season, where the two charts seem to be in sync. What does this mean for the Fund? It could mean we go sideways, and we do for a while. There could be volatility, but that unit chart could float between 14 units and 18 units all season.
Let's see how it tests levels going forward and let's see if it can first avert a further slide. Mainly, I wanted to demonstrate the different ways we can look at these charts when dealing with these functions.
Now to the Haymaker Fund, which is just one or two wins away from even, despite going 9-26 so far this season...
