on3's MLB 2012 Opening Game system thread 194-8 last year +60 units

[Wallco99]

the reason i need the amount posted is that there is no logic for them to be set since the season started.look back in the thread and try to give me any consistant logic that predict whats the next amount will be...gl
plus if we dont all bet the same amount until On3 is back then his labby line will be out of use

I wasn't singling you out, there are several people everyday lost in Bet World. Who cares about his labby, that is his own specific bets, doesn't mean everyone has to do it the same way, and probably don't. Since he has no logic, it's another example of him veering from any kind of system, which would be even more reason for you not to need it posted, since you should be betting with logic, and not jumbling stuff around when you see fit. Bottom line, labby is stupid!

[juice050]

I wasn't singling you out, there are several people everyday lost in Bet World. Who cares about his labby, that is his own specific bets, doesn't mean everyone has to do it the same way, and probably don't. Since he has no logic, it's another example of him veering from any kind of system, which would be even more reason for you not to need it posted, since you should be betting with logic, and not jumbling stuff around when you see fit. Bottom line, labby is stupid!

lmaoo wallco keeps it official on what he feels. i agree though.

[Wallco99]

To put another dagger in it, the LAA dropped to -135, according to the system rules if a qualifying team drops below -140, they will no longer be a play. But who knows what rules are being used? They are not a play for me unless they come back up.

[J.M. Disciple]

four official plays today. MIL is a fringe play. since i wont be able to update later today, if MIL o/u hits 9 (right now at 8.5 -120), it will be official AND filtered.


System record 54-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -16; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/1

#60 -- chicago @ SF -164 (A) -- o/u 7
#61 -- baltimore @ TB -163 (A) -- o/u 7
#62 -- oakland @ KC -149 (A) -- o/u 7.5
#63 -- atlanta @ WAS -145 (A) -- o/u 7.5

Game 1 win = 31-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x

SF to win 98
TB to win 98
KC to win 100
WAS to win 92

This was On3's last post. So it becomes very simple. Labby lines got cleared on 6/1 if im not mistaken with the sweep. Washington was a canceled game there for no play. Line A gets cleared which goes from:

OLD LINES
98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98


New LInes
10 - 10 - 10 - 10
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

So LAA is an A bet today there for you bet to win $20 on it.

I am not trying to run the thread, but im sure any one can do it with any logic. And as much crap everyone given me I really dont want to run the thread.


LAA to win $20 (A)

[J.M. Disciple]

Wallco I read your drop to -135 post too late. Since LAA is on a fresh line however I think because its such a small wager it will not effect the lines that much and since most people most likely already bet on the game might as well just let it be a play.

Also want to note those complaining about not having any C bets to clear the line. All the A bets we are winning are giving us a cushion in case we hit another downswing.

Good Luck all who take LAA today.

*system integrity is on LAA today and that system has never lost more then 6 straight games in over 6 seasons. LAA is game 6 today.

[stevex]

Labby is stupid? Wallco what world do you live in?

I've made bank the past 2 years implementing the labby money management system, maybe its just because you don't/can't and never will understand how to REALLY use it. That's why you hate it so much....

Aww mad because you've gone broke chasing like a fool with your NBA System...

Such a joke.

[Wallco99]

Labby is stupid? Wallco what world do you live in?

I've made bank the past 2 years implementing the labby money management system, maybe its just because you don't/can't and never will understand how to REALLY use it. That's why you hate it so much....

Aww mad because you've gone broke chasing like a fool with your NBA System...

Such a joke.

I probably shouldn't have phrased it that way, I mean, I don't like it. Not to change the topic, but both my NHL and NBA systems are in the black, and yes, from chasing.

[Wallco99]

Wallco I read your drop to -135 post too late. Since LAA is on a fresh line however I think because its such a small wager it will not effect the lines that much and since most people most likely already bet on the game might as well just let it be a play.

Also want to note those complaining about not having any C bets to clear the line. All the A bets we are winning are giving us a cushion in case we hit another downswing.

Good Luck all who take LAA today.

*system integrity is on LAA today and that system has never lost more then 6 straight games in over 6 seasons. LAA is game 6 today.

Unfortunately, JM is on Seattle, and that system is hot right now.

[stevex]

on3 come bacccckkkkk

[Wallco99]

on3 come bacccckkkkk

Pleeeeease do!!

[analyzer]

Sorry guys on vacation this week but where did on3 go?

[stevex]

So is there a final solution here as to who where betting tonight?

[The HOFF]

I think everyone can decide for themselves if LAA are a play. Currently at -141. And I believe On3 would not be starting a new line but would either shuffle the numbers or just play to win one number from the second line (ie. 92)

More series tomorrow.

JUNE 5
Red Sox vs Orioles
Yankees vs Rays
White Sox vs Blue Jays
Tigers vs Indians
Marlins vs Braves
Nationals vs Mets
Reds vs Pirates
Astros vs Cardinals
Brewers vs Cubs
Padres vs Giants

[Hunner24]

I would say no plays today. KC is certainly not a play in my opinion. on3 (and the system rules) doesn't seem to like those line drops to below 140 that LAA went through either.

And I agree with The HOFF, based on what he's done in the past, we would either shuffle the lines or play to win the 92 and 95 from the second line. More than likely it would be a shuffle.

[stevex]

KC and Angels both no plays for me. Got plenty of more series tomorrow that could be really "official" so just laying off...

Already on the Angels with Integrity's System so

[J.M. Disciple]

I think everyone can decide for themselves if LAA are a play. Currently at -141. And I believe On3 would not be starting a new line but would either shuffle the numbers or just play to win one number from the second line (ie. 92)

More series tomorrow.

JUNE 5
Red Sox vs Orioles
Yankees vs Rays
White Sox vs Blue Jays
Tigers vs Indians
Marlins vs Braves
Nationals vs Mets
Reds vs Pirates
Astros vs Cardinals
Brewers vs Cubs
Padres vs Giants

why would On3 not start a new line when LAA is an A bet? he bets A bets on first line, B bets on 2nd line and C bets on 3rd line. Lets not make it all complicated again. The shuffle comes in when there is a loss and he divides the loss between line A and Line B then shuffles the numbers. When you look back at his last post all 3 bets were A bets and all 3 were bet on Line 1.

[J.M. Disciple]

Unfortunately, JM is on Seattle, and that system is hot right now.

I realized that when I posted Seattle was swept by LAA in their last series. Hopefully LAA wins by 1 and both systems win.

[Hunner24]

why would On3 not start a new line when LAA is an A bet? he bets A bets on first line, B bets on 2nd line and C bets on 3rd line. Lets not make it all complicated again. The shuffle comes in when there is a loss and he divides the loss between line A and Line B then shuffles the numbers. When you look back at his last post all 3 bets were A bets and all 3 were bet on Line 1.

The would-be Washington game was an A bet that he was playing off the B line.

[J.M. Disciple]

The would-be Washington game was an A bet that he was playing off the B line.

Only because the first 3 games took off the first 3 #s on the line. Look at past results where the line got cleared and he started a new line. You may run your labby as you wish, i am just saying what on3 would most likely do.

[Hunner24]

Only because the first 3 games took off the first 3 #s on the line. Look at past results where the line got cleared and he started a new line. You may run your labby as you wish, i am just saying what on3 would most likely do.

This is not true. See the last sweep in post 1624 and 1635. Almost this exact situation. A line cleared, B line 2 cleared, and a full, juicy C line. On3 would most likely shuffle these lines as I said. But run your labby as you wish....

[MrMannix]

All opening lines:
Detriot -150 o/u 9
Boston -160 o/u 9
Washington -155
Cincinnati -145
You can figure your own labby.
GLTA

[MrMannix]

Detriot is also a JM A play!

[J.M. Disciple]

This is not true. See the last sweep in post 1624 and 1635. Almost this exact situation. A line cleared, B line 2 cleared, and a full, juicy C line. On3 would most likely shuffle these lines as I said. But run your labby as you wish....

Didn't he shuffle it due to the amount on the C line though? C line is a lot less now.

[J.M. Disciple]

Old lines
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98



Curious if you all want to shuffle the numbers or add a new line? What we could do is take 92+95 =187 and divide by 8 and create that average over line A and Line B

So new lines would look like this:

24 -24 - 24 - 24
24 - 24 - 24 - 24
55 - 72 - 76 - 98

Suggestions? Just trying to get everyone on the same page. Then tomorrow if there are 4 games since the line would be relatively low we would bet to win $48 on each game.

Agree / Disagree?

[J.M. Disciple]

ON3's old post

System record 54-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -16; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/1

#60 -- chicago @ SF -164 (A) -- o/u 7
#61 -- baltimore @ TB -163 (A) -- o/u 7
#62 -- oakland @ KC -149 (A) -- o/u 7.5
#63 -- atlanta @ WAS -145 (A) -- o/u 7.5

Game 1 win = 31-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATED

System record 57-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -1; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/5

#64 Detriot -150 o/u 9
#65 Boston -160 o/u 9
#66 Washington -155
#67 Cincinnati -145

Game 1 win = 34-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular) (OLD)

x-x-x-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

New Lines
24-24-24-24
24-24-24-24
55-72-76-98
Labby Line (filter)

10-10-10-10

FILTERED
#15 Detriot -150 o/u 9 To win $20
#16 Boston -160 o/u 9 To win $20
Regular
#64 Detriot -150 o/u 9 .......to win 48
#65 Boston -160 o/u 9 .......to win 48
#66 Washington -155 .......to win 48
#67 Cincinnati -145 .......to win 48

HOWS THIS LOOK?

[Wallco99]

ON3's old post

System record 54-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -16; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/1

#60 -- chicago @ SF -164 (A) -- o/u 7
#61 -- baltimore @ TB -163 (A) -- o/u 7
#62 -- oakland @ KC -149 (A) -- o/u 7.5
#63 -- atlanta @ WAS -145 (A) -- o/u 7.5

Game 1 win = 31-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATED

System record 57-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -1; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/5

#64 Detriot -150 o/u 9
#65 Boston -160 o/u 9
#66 Washington -155
#67 Cincinnati -145

Game 1 win = 34-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular) (OLD)

x-x-x-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

New Lines
24-24-24-24
24-24-24-24
55-72-76-98
Labby Line (filter)

10-10-10-10

FILTERED
#15 Detriot -150 o/u 9 To win $20
#16 Boston -160 o/u 9 To win $20
Regular
#64 Detriot -150 o/u 9 .......to win 48
#65 Boston -160 o/u 9 .......to win 48
#66 Washington -155 .......to win 48
#67 Cincinnati -145 .......to win 48

HOWS THIS LOOK?

It looks like the secret formula for the Big Mac's special sauce. If so, it looks delicious.

[The HOFF]

Looks just fine JM.

[alexknyc]

I see Milwaukee at -151, Did they not open above -145?

[Hunner24]

Not trying to be a dick, but 187/8 is not 24. Its close to 23, but just take 5 off a C line number to make the shuffle balance. So:

24-24-24-24
24-24-24-24
55-72-76-93

That balances, and gives us a chance to clear them up. Good work though JM!

[Hunner24]

I see Milwaukee at -151, Did they not open above -145?

They opened around -142 I believe. I think they would be updated to a play, however, in on3's mind.

[Nino7]

...

[Lakey]

Don't forget the Angels need to be played as a B bet.

[jturn49]

I think that looks good. My labbys are a little different due to missing out on a couple plays and playing a couple of boarderline plays that on3 eventually did not but I have shuffled mine similarly to what you have done. Thanks to everyone for helping out

[allidoiswin89]

Old lines
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98



Curious if you all want to shuffle the numbers or add a new line? What we could do is take 92+95 =187 and divide by 8 and create that average over line A and Line B

So new lines would look like this:

24 -24 - 24 - 24
24 - 24 - 24 - 24
55 - 72 - 76 - 98

Suggestions? Just trying to get everyone on the same page. Then tomorrow if there are 4 games since the line would be relatively low we would bet to win $48 on each game.

Agree / Disagree?

Please don't do that to yourself. I am not going to get into all the theory and logic that goes into this but switch line 3 with line 1....people are going to ask why and even though this isn't the best reason, a novice will understand this ....you have a winning % on a and b bets so why not put more money there compared to a c bet that has a losing %.... also, putting larger numbers on a and b bets (aggressive la by) gives you more oppurtunity to clear these lines as you might go weeks without a C win as many games end by B. This allows you to cover more units sooner rather than later, thus making the system more profitable and allowing you to increase your lines for even more gain in the future if you have a system that wins....and obviously everyone here believes that else they wouldn't be betting it

[KennyM10]

could anyone tell me how much to bet on LAA?im lost with these labby its always different

o

Because laa lost. you will not hear about them again. Everyone will just pretend it was not a play today.