LTA, just dropping in to say hi. Hope u on the brew crew tonight.
Comment
Redscot
SBR MVP
05-16-11
2571
#4062
Originally posted by BigDan
GM 5 bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why is that asshole talking about phi/mil series? Cards aint done yet ye of many names...........
Tell me you weren't eyeing some unsuspecting Phillie fan top of the 1st
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4063
Originally posted by Trivial
Nice call on the cards. That helps a lot. Phew.
Just stop man. It wasn't a "call". He didn't predict a cards win. He bet on a probability of the cards winning that he thought was better than their true probability. Whether the cards won or lost it was a great bet because the closer was beat by 6 cents. Had the philles scored 3 in the 9th, you would be huffing and puffing and thought he didn't make a nice call. Leave the results oriented comments at home guy
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4064
Originally posted by No coincidences
Early birds probably got the worm on that total. I could see it landing at 9, which would pay off only those who took it at 8.5.
Comment
Love The Action
SBR Posting Legend
11-08-10
10952
#4065
MLB Final Numbers for Regular Season 2011
418 - 378 = +38.03x
MLB 2011 Playoff Recap 10/5/11
1 - 0 = +1x
MLB 2011 Playoffs
5 - 5 = -2.6x
Slowly but surely we inch back to the black for the playoffs after that big 4x loss last Sunday. We've had three straight profitable days and we'll go for four tomorrow....
Comment
Redscot
SBR MVP
05-16-11
2571
#4066
Originally posted by Almighty
Just stop man. It wasn't a "call". He didn't predict a cards win. He bet on a probability of the cards winning that he thought was better than their true probability. Whether the cards won or lost it was a great bet because the closer was beat by 6 cents. Had the philles scored 3 in the 9th, you would be huffing and puffing and thought he didn't make a nice call. Leave the results oriented comments at home guy
The term "Wet Blanket" comes to mind.
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4067
Originally posted by Redscot
The term "Wet Blanket" comes to mind.
The guy thought Jim Leyland was a pitcher I can't help it
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4068
I shut it down before the playoffs. Not the most logical thinking, but to bet at most probably 5 games throughout the playoffs is just variance in my mind I don't need eating into my season's profit
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4069
Originally posted by Redscot
Tell me you weren't eyeing some unsuspecting Phillie fan top of the 1st
wasnt to angry yet as at this point id be a fool not to expect Edwin to give up a few in the 1st. Never thought we couldnt get to Oswalt.
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4070
screw punching a philly fan. Ye of many names would be so fun to chin check. something tells me his internet mouth is much stronger than his jaw...
Comment
Redscot
SBR MVP
05-16-11
2571
#4071
Originally posted by BigDan
wasnt to angry yet as at this point id be a fool not to expect Edwin to give up a few in the 1st. Never thought we couldnt get to Oswalt.
True. Gonna be a hell of a matchup come Friday. 2 Bulldogs squaring off.
Comment
815Sox
SBR MVP
09-13-10
1078
#4072
I have to say, its almost like Jackson expects to be rocky in the first now. You just have to hope that the other team doesn't hurt him beyond repair. He looked very good tonight, I thought the Phillies would overpower him but nope. The Phils offense is really struggling right now and this is not the time to do it.
Comment
Krazymojo
SBR Sharp
12-01-10
444
#4073
red what u doing for the az/mil game?
Comment
Redscot
SBR MVP
05-16-11
2571
#4074
Originally posted by Krazymojo
red what u doing for the az/mil game?
Drinkin' . I lean BrewCrew but not enough to put money on it.
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4075
Originally posted by BigDan
screw punching a philly fan. Ye of many names would be so fun to chin check. something tells me his internet mouth is much stronger than his jaw...
address me properly son
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4076
Originally posted by Almighty
address me properly son
pretty sure i did "boy"....
Comment
Trivial
SBR MVP
11-22-09
1328
#4077
Originally posted by Almighty
Just stop man. It wasn't a "call". He didn't predict a cards win. He bet on a probability of the cards winning that he thought was better than their true probability. Whether the cards won or lost it was a great bet because the closer was beat by 6 cents. Had the philles scored 3 in the 9th, you would be huffing and puffing and thought he didn't make a nice call. Leave the results oriented comments at home guy
Shhesh - stop playing on words man. I was just saying that his analysis of the probability of the cards winning came to fruition.
I in no way second guess someone. I am not one of these shitheads who go off on people predicting wrong. It is called gambling for a reason. It isn't a GIC at a bank paying 0.1% interest or something.
Risk = reward, but even stocks can go down and lose.
Crap man, take a chill pill.
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4078
Originally posted by Trivial
Shhesh - stop playing on words man. I was just saying that his analysis of the probability of the cards winning came to fruition.
It came to fruition because of where the line closed, not the result of the game. Had the phillies won, you wouldn't be saying nice call, that's my point.
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4079
Trivial dont waste your time with that douche. trust me he the biggest fraud on a forum full of them. That clown talking "profits" when the gms he put his little nuts out there never hit, so i guess he only hits the gms he is scared to talk about till after the fact(shocking)...this gm was a no-brainer, doesnt take a stat geek to know that this was going to gm 5 any more than it did to know phil was gonna wax stl after albert went down and they were beat the hell up earlier in the year(that clown was all over cards for those gms, HUGE VALUE)............
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4080
Originally posted by BigDan
Trivial dont waste your time with that douche. trust me he the biggest fraud on a forum full of them. That clown talking "profits" when the gms he put his little nuts out there never hit, so i guess he only hits the gms he is scared to talk about till after the fact(shocking)...this gm was a no-brainer, doesnt take a stat geek to know that this was going to gm 5 any more than it did to know phil was gonna wax stl after albert went down and they were beat the hell up earlier in the year(that clown was all over cards for those gms, HUGE VALUE)............
spoken like a true square
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4081
Bodog just gave me +102 on the d-bags......not tired so fukk it...go d-bags!!!!! the team not you ye of many names *i could see how this would be confusing as you are no doubt a d-bag)...
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4082
Originally posted by Almighty
spoken like a true square
A square that is up much more than you im sure....sorry stat boy, i use my eyes and actually knowledge and i know that bothers you cause you are incapable of that
funny how someone who thinks so highly of herself relies on formulas that others came up with. Sad really...
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#4083
Hey "God" -- I see all of your posts asking if Boston was a stupid bet at -300 the day Beckett lost to the O's and you were banned have mysteriously vanished ...
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4084
Originally posted by BigDan
A square that is up much more than you im sure....sorry stat boy, i use my eyes and actually knowledge and i know that bothers you cause you are incapable of that
of course, everyone this board is a winner! and not a small one either! why do people feel the need to validate themselves on a message board? you ain't up long term we both know that
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4085
Originally posted by No coincidences
Hey "God" -- I see all of your posts asking if Boston was a stupid bet at -300 the day Beckett lost to the O's and you were banned have mysteriously vanished ...
What? If you're talking about the Tommy Hunter game of course -300 would be stupid, I think that game closed around -250
Comment
Trivial
SBR MVP
11-22-09
1328
#4086
Originally posted by Almighty
It came to fruition because of where the line closed, not the result of the game. Had the phillies won, you wouldn't be saying nice call, that's my point.
Umm.. do some searches from me my friend. I have constantly complimented the right call, even when the wager lost. People like LTA and others can easily say screw off to all of us and go make money just fine on their own without any sharing. They enjoy talking about it, getting opinions, and sharing and we all benefit from that. The English word for that is a "forum" which I am participating in.
I could give two flying f**ks about baseball. I'd rather watch grass growing on the field than watch lame asses throwing a ball at insane speeds. I do so because of the possibility of making money, and talking to fine folks who actually care about the sport. There are likely people who do the same for the sports I do care about and they don't.
So go take your technical details to someone who gives a shit. I'm here to talk with normal folk.
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4087
Originally posted by Almighty
of course, everyone this board is a winner! and not a small one either! why do people feel the need to validate themselves on a message board? you ain't up long term we both know that
im not the one who started talking "profits"...we all know god damn well you have never been up in your life, hell i doubt you can even get "up" if you know what im saying, not that you could find any woman to fukk your pathetic ass....
im certainly not the one here trying to validate myself, to everyone but you that is obvious....
Comment
Trivial
SBR MVP
11-22-09
1328
#4088
Originally posted by BigDan
Trivial dont waste your time with that douche. trust me he the biggest fraud on a forum full of them. That clown talking "profits" when the gms he put his little nuts out there never hit, so i guess he only hits the gms he is scared to talk about till after the fact(shocking)...this gm was a no-brainer, doesnt take a stat geek to know that this was going to gm 5 any more than it did to know phil was gonna wax stl after albert went down and they were beat the hell up earlier in the year(that clown was all over cards for those gms, HUGE VALUE)............
Thanks for the advice. I'll let him burn.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#4089
Originally posted by Almighty
What? If you're talking about the Tommy Hunter game of course -300 would be stupid, I think that game closed around -250
You are a goddam liar.
You asked me the day after Boston lost to the O's and you called it the "play of the month" if it'd be a bad bet to take Boston the next day, making it sound like you'd be a fool to fade them again. Now the posts are mysteriously missing and you've done an about-face.
You lost your ass taking Boston down the stretch. Period.
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4090
Roenicke starting Kottaras over Lucroy??? Their R/L splits are polar opposites and guess which is dead weight against lefties
Comment
hawley
SBR Posting Legend
05-10-10
14270
#4091
Originally posted by Almighty
of course, everyone this board is a winner! and not a small one either! why do people feel the need to validate themselves on a message board? you ain't up long term we both know that
Pot meet kettle...
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4092
Originally posted by No coincidences
You are a goddam liar.
You asked me the day after Boston lost to the O's and you called it the "play of the month" if it'd be a bad bet to take Boston the next day, making it sound like you'd be a fool to fade them again. Now the posts are mysteriously missing and you've done an about-face.
You lost your ass taking Boston down the stretch. Period.
"mysteriously missing" lol....I think you're talking about when I bet Bedard but nowhere did I say it was the play of the month nor did I bet boston the next day
Comment
Krazymojo
SBR Sharp
12-01-10
444
#4093
BrewCrew-112 3x
Comment
Almighty
Restricted User
10-05-11
29
#4094
Originally posted by hawley
Pot meet kettle...
everyone thinks I'm a huge loser and that every pick I post loses. I'm thrilled they think I always lose I could care less, that's the opposite of caring about message board approval
Comment
BigDan
Restricted User
04-28-11
5104
#4095
Originally posted by No coincidences
You are a goddam liar.
You asked me the day after Boston lost to the O's and you called it the "play of the month" if it'd be a bad bet to take Boston the next day, making it sound like you'd be a fool to fade them again. Now the posts are mysteriously missing and you've done an about-face.
You lost your ass taking Boston down the stretch. Period.
ive never seen the guy on a winning side until after the fact....but im sure long term he is doing great