John Morrison 2011 MLB

[goodone]

2 things:

1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.

[Wallco99]

Hey Wallco,

Didn't I just read a discussion that Cubs have never won more than 2 straight all season? So far they won the A & B bet, so why the C bet?

I trust in your system and will play as you post but just a thought.

IceBet

Thus proving that I am not handicapping the series or posting plays based on my personal beliefs. Not that it's a good or bad bet, but do you honestly believe that the Cubs will never again win three in a row. +180 on a C bet hit would be pretty nice if they happen to be official and win.

[Wallco99]

Double post.

[Wallco99]

Good job wallco

Thank you, you seem to be doing pretty well yourself over there.

[Wallco99]

Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.

It's a four game series, so it won't be for the sweep. The game is not yet official. Argue when it is.

[Wallco99]

My question was for Wallco, who listed yesterday's loss as being on the Cubs -1.5, not you.

I deliberately cutoff the quote from yesterday and left in the date so it would not be confused with his typical plays. If someone mistakes what is clearly not a complete Wallco post for today well...

Wallco's play was in the wee hours of the morning so I want to make sure it's not a mistake like his reference to yesterday's play being on the cubs. I'm surprised no one else mentioned that. I think I have that right to ask that without catching a lecture.

Sorry about that, yesterday's loss was a misprint. We lost on San Diego not the Cubs, I forgot to change that one this morning. Same result no matter which team we would have had anyway. And as thelimit asked, please don't quote the official posts. It does cause confusion and the reply with the "bowing down" smiley face wasn't necessary by whoever posted that. He was only repeating what I have asked several times.

[alex81]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 94-6
System profit/loss: +26.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +6.14 units (79-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-3.00 units)

(6/14/11) Colorado (M/L) (B) – Win
(6/14/11) Colorado (-1½) (B) – Win
(6/14/11) Chicago Cubs (-1½) (B) – Loss
(6/14/11) Philadelphia (M/L) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) Philadelphia (-1½) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) Washington (M/L) (A) – Win
(6/14/11) San Francisco (M/L) (A) – Win


(A) 49-48
(B) 20-25
(C) 12-13
(D) 7-6


Games for (6/15/11):
Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs (-1½) (C) (8:05 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The last time I remember betting on the Cubs it wasn't pretty!

[Wallco99]

Hey wallco, havent really been following you or JM since basketball, good luck on your new system, ima start betting small on it, I see you got some losses already so hopefully this is a good time to jump in.
My question is if you have ever backtested JM system but taking the ML on dogs and RL for favs, I know you will have more losses but most plays would be + odds so maybe it would even out. This is how I plan on doing it for baseball for now.
Sorry if this has been discussed here but just way too much bs to sift through on this thread, wish it was more like the JM/Chase110 thread you guys had for basketball. Anyways thanks for the picks and all that.

I mentioned that this is how I've been playing all season, I am up more than JM traditional method is. Especially good on the losses. Though I've been playing this, I haven't tested it, but I like it.

[thelimit0310]

@alex, please don't quote official play posts! as i was saying earlier today it causes confusion! thanks bud

Cant wait for the word from Wallco! good luck tonight everyone!

[Wallco99]

The last time I remember betting on the Cubs it wasn't pretty!

Is this the point of the day when I am supposed to twist your arm. I'll pass.

[DreJay25]

Can we take points away from Alex for quoting the plays after all the talk about NOT quoting the plays, and I find it amazing that so many people are putting this as a 3 game series.... 1 game at a time.... the 2 games that are done are done we play THIS game, lastly didn't someone say yesterday that the Cubs has not won back to back games all year?? Well that was accomplished, so why can't this.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/15/11
2011 System to date: 94-6
System profit/loss: +26.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +6.14 units (79-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-3.00 units)

Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs ( -1½) (C) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)

** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[Wilba]

Can we take points away from Alex for quoting the plays after all the talk about NOT quoting the plays, and I find it amazing that so many people are putting this as a 3 game series.... 1 game at a time.... the 2 games that are done are done we play THIS game, lastly didn't someone say yesterday that the Cubs has not won back to back games all year?? Well that was accomplished, so why can't this.

Completely agree with everything that you say.

Except you had the comment slightly wrong about the Cubs - it was stated that the Cubs have not won MORE than 2 games in a row all year, not that they have not won two. They have won 2 in a row 7 times (the most recent time being yesterday) and the other 6 times they have gone on to lose the next game after winning two in a row.

BUT SO WHAT!? trends are made to be broken. If you follow the system then follow it. If you want to do your own capping, then don’t follow the system! pretty simple stuff.

I think some people just like following other peoples plays so they have someone else to blame if/when they lose bets

[Wilba]

I like the Brewers to win today

[bruce0]

Sorry about that, yesterday's loss was a misprint. We lost on San Diego not the Cubs, I forgot to change that one this morning. Same result no matter which team we would have had anyway. And as thelimit asked, please don't quote the official posts. It does cause confusion and the reply with the "bowing down" smiley face wasn't necessary by whoever posted that. He was only repeating what I have asked several times.

More confusion on my part as yesterday's loss was on Milwaukee, not the cubs, you mean. I think this time we have an obvious typo though.

I just wanted to make sure that the loss wasn't recorded on the Cubs and thus some type of chase on them in particular, seeing as how we don't know the criteria. The way it's raining here in Chicago, I wouldn't be surprised if the game is rescheduled.

[ITSNOT]

Alright cool, seems like a better idea, thanks wallco and thanks for the pick tonight!

[Wallco99]

More confusion on my part as yesterday's loss was on Milwaukee, not the cubs, you mean. I think this time we have an obvious typo though.

I just wanted to make sure that the loss wasn't recorded on the Cubs and thus some type of chase on them in particular, seeing as how we don't know the criteria. The way it's raining here in Chicago, I wouldn't be surprised if the game is rescheduled.

Yes, Milwaukee, sorry again. The Cubs always seem to bring out the worst of us.

[oklahoma]

I think some people just like following other peoples plays so they have someone else to blame if/when they lose bets

truer words have never been spoken.

[jcygts6]

SF giants totally owns Arizona d-backs very foolish to go against sf

[edh1011]

another god damn loss tonight. This shit is starting to get old. Even with good money management.

[thelimit0310]

another god damn loss tonight. This shit is starting to get old. Even with good money management.

There better not be another shit storm because of this. It's not a series loss, its a D bet for Wallco and a C bet for JM. It sucks for the JM system as its a huge - money system, but Wallco's system WILL have some losses this season. It happens, and if you don't like it, don't play it. But don't start talking shit, that doesn't solve anything and this thread doesn't need it.

I will say one thing though, the Cubs need to be excluded for the rest of the season!

Can't wait to wrap these series' up tomorrow, one way or the other, good night fellas

[oklahoma]

another god damn loss tonight. This shit is starting to get old. Even with good money management.

if the D bet loses tomorrow itll be a loss. and someone posted the record since the last series loss, 14-1 i think it was. easy to focus on the losses, hardly anyone made a peep when the series was killing it the last couple weeks.

[edh1011]

Only referring to jm.

[DANO74]

Betting on the Cubs is SUICIDE...Debating on taking that scary(D)bet tomorrow

[lawalahmed]

Thanks Wallco for sharing your system and also thank Wilba for sharing your stastistic......

........I'm on Milkaukee tonight......

Let get those "C and D" 2morrow.......

[Glada Tartan]

GL tonight... Cubs... huuuuh..

[venture]

SF is now .018 rpi higher than ARI. To play or not to play

[knugen]

Aahh common, if u played A and B ofcourse u play C, make à labby and be happy

[Andy3568]

SF is now .018 rpi higher than ARI. To play or not to play

Yep, so the weasel has an out if it's another "C" loss.

The flip side of the coin is that it's a V2 bet if you choose to bet it. A huge risk doubling up on a "C" bet that's out of RPI range.

[DreJay25]

Betting on the Cubs is SUICIDE...Debating on taking that scary(D)bet tomorrow

Not that I'm even close to being a professional, or really having any knowledge of this system for that matter but I believe todays play will be on the Brewers RL

[thelimit0310]

If the Cubs are the D bet tonight I'll probably still play them but go small. They've been pathetic this season, all series picks for the Cubs here on out I'm going to play half or a 4th of a unit on. Hoping I don't have to lay more money on the Cubs tonight, I know it's for a system, but I really feel like I'm throwing money away, my nephews little league team is better than those guys.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 94-6
System profit/loss: +26.41 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +6.14 units (79-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-7.00 units)

(6/15/11) Chicago Cubs (-1½) (C) – Loss


(A) 49-48
(B) 20-25
(C) 12-14
(D) 7-6


Games for (6/16/11):
Milwaukee (-1½) @ Chicago Cubs (D) *Official* (2:20 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[jbrent95]

SF is now .018 rpi higher than ARI. To play or not to play

I say stay away. I did not play this series because if arz lost the 1st two games the the RPI difference would be more than .015.

[thelimit0310]

I will be playing Arizona on my labby today. But chasers be careful, and don't expect JM to mark it as a system loss either. Even if this series loses he will claim to be undefeated because of his stupid filter, despite the fact that he sent out the series as official.

Speaking of JM and Labby, where has stevex been? Did he bust on his high risk labby with that C loss? Hmm.

Thanks for the early play Wallco!

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1) 1 series pending
(A) 8-5
(B) 2-3
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 1-1
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 6-0

Official
(6/15/2011) Arizona (.505) v San Francisco (.518) M/L (B) Loss

Next Plays
Official
(6/16/2011) Arizona (.503) v San Francisco (.521) M/L (C) V2

Upcoming Plays
(6/17/2011) Oakland v San Francisco

Notes: As of right now I've posted the play as official. Have not received an email from Morrison yet but I'm assuming he'll send it out as official and then disqualify it if it loses. What we'll do here is hold his record accountable for plays he sends out as official whether or not he erases the loss after the fact. If he calls it off before the (C) bet then we'll have to deal with that. If someone gets the email please post in case I'm away from the computer. It also qualifies as a V2 play and I'm also considering a run line bet on them at +160. That's a personal choice. There was one sweep yesterday (LAD) but they do not meet again this year so no future play. There are 6 Possible sweeps today and I'll update in the morning. GL all today.